mptcp.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash-to: "selftests: mptcp: tweak simult_flows for debug kernels"
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:55:34 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <edce75f6-48fc-7b40-af0-8a5410b19223@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acfcb031-4be5-c5a2-6858-02fed78a89f3@tessares.net>

On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, Matthieu Baerts wrote:

> Hi Mat,
>
> On 27/06/2022 23:44, Mat Martineau wrote:
>> kbuild is still seeing intermittent failures in the simult_flows.sh
>> test. It uses a kernel config without kmemleak, but with other
>> performance-affecting debug options like lockdep and kasan.
>>
>> Example failures:
>> kernel-selftests.net/mptcp.simult_flows.sh.unbalanced_bwidth_with_unbalanced_delay_transfer_slower_than_expected!_runtime_4339_ms_expected_4005_ms_max_4005.fail
>> kernel-selftests.net/mptcp.simult_flows.sh.unbalanced_bwidth_transfer_slower_than_expected!_runtime_4285_ms_expected_4005_ms_max_4005.fail
>> kernel-selftests.net/mptcp.simult_flows.sh.unbalanced_bwidth_transfer_slower_than_expected!_runtime_4346_ms_expected_4005_ms_max_4005.fail
>
> If I'm not mistaken, adding 200ms would not prevent these failures if
> you got 4346ms instead of 4005ms, right? It looks like we need to extend
> the time to something around 350ms.
>

I had thought the "slack" was calculated differently, but I think you're 
correct here. I am a little reluctant to increase the limit too far, since 
the whole point is to detect when the transfers become slower - and we 
seem to instead keep finding slower CI systems!

What do you think about this approach: make simult_flows.sh 'SKIP' when 
debug kernel features are detected, unless a "-f" flag forces it to run? 
That way we could run it with debug features where we know the system 
performance, like our CI, but not show bogus failures on random 
debug-enabled systems.


>> Adjust the debug detection to loosen the simult_flows timing constraints
>> if either kmemleak or lockdep are configured.
>
> Good idea!
> I didn't find any "safe" ways to easily check that KASAN is used.
>
> Checking dmesg doesn't seem to be a safe way for all environments.
>
> But maybe we could do this? (with '-q')
>
>  $ grep mm/kasan /sys/devices/system/cpu/hotplug/states/sys/devices
>  /system/cpu/hotplug/states:70:214: mm/kasan:online
>

How about:

grep -q ' kmemleak_init$\| lockdep_init$\| kasan_init$\| prove_locking$' /proc/kallsyms

?

That detects the compiled-in features, rather than what's enabled at 
runtime, but it's simple and may be good enough.

--
Mat Martineau
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-28 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-27 21:44 [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash-to: "selftests: mptcp: tweak simult_flows for debug kernels" Mat Martineau
2022-06-27 23:11 ` Squash-to: "selftests: mptcp: tweak simult_flows for debug kernels": Tests Results MPTCP CI
2022-06-28  9:42 ` [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash-to: "selftests: mptcp: tweak simult_flows for debug kernels" Matthieu Baerts
2022-06-28 17:55   ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2022-06-29  8:32     ` Matthieu Baerts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=edce75f6-48fc-7b40-af0-8a5410b19223@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).