[PATCH] rfkill: Add handling when rfkill's type is RFKILL_TYPE_ALL.

[PATCH] rfkill: Add handling when rfkill's type is RFKILL_TYPE_ALL.

[Alex Hung]

This rfkill type is supposed to be able to toggles the status of all wireless
devices; however, no wireless devices will register itself with type 
RFKILL_TYPE_ALL and thus it was previously ignored in __rfkill_switch_all.

Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
---
 net/rfkill/core.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
index 5be1957..84dd71a 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/core.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void __rfkill_switch_all(const enum rfkill_type type, bool blocked)
 
 	rfkill_global_states[type].cur = blocked;
 	list_for_each_entry(rfkill, &rfkill_list, node) {
-		if (rfkill->type != type)
+		if (rfkill->type != type && type != RFKILL_TYPE_ALL)
 			continue;
 
 		rfkill_set_block(rfkill, blocked);
-- 
1.7.0.4

Re: [PATCH] rfkill: Add handling when rfkill's type is RFKILL_TYPE_ALL.

[Johannes Berg]

On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 16:37 +0800, Alex Hung wrote:
> This rfkill type is supposed to be able to toggles the status of all wireless
> devices; however, no wireless devices will register itself with type 
> RFKILL_TYPE_ALL and thus it was previously ignored in __rfkill_switch_all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  net/rfkill/core.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
> index 5be1957..84dd71a 100644
> --- a/net/rfkill/core.c
> +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void __rfkill_switch_all(const enum rfkill_type type, bool blocked)
>  
>  	rfkill_global_states[type].cur = blocked;
>  	list_for_each_entry(rfkill, &rfkill_list, node) {
> -		if (rfkill->type != type)
> +		if (rfkill->type != type && type != RFKILL_TYPE_ALL)
>  			continue;

Sorry, I accidentally replied to this in private and then Alex replied
but it all got lost.

He said he was going to change the eeepc use KEY_RFKILL instead of
KEY_WLAN to switch all types...

So I guess what this change really does is make __rfkill_switch_all() be
able to not only switch all devices of a given type, but also be able to
switch all devices of all types.

Alex, can you please rewrite the commit log to make that clearer?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] rfkill: Add handling when rfkill's type is RFKILL_TYPE_ALL.

[Alex Hung]

On 05/23/2012 02:46 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 16:37 +0800, Alex Hung wrote:
>> This rfkill type is supposed to be able to toggles the status of all wireless
>> devices; however, no wireless devices will register itself with type
>> RFKILL_TYPE_ALL and thus it was previously ignored in __rfkill_switch_all.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung<alex.hung@canonical.com>
>> ---
>>   net/rfkill/core.c |    2 +-
>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
>> index 5be1957..84dd71a 100644
>> --- a/net/rfkill/core.c
>> +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
>> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void __rfkill_switch_all(const enum rfkill_type type, bool blocked)
>>
>>   	rfkill_global_states[type].cur = blocked;
>>   	list_for_each_entry(rfkill,&rfkill_list, node) {
>> -		if (rfkill->type != type)
>> +		if (rfkill->type != type&&  type != RFKILL_TYPE_ALL)
>>   			continue;
>
> Sorry, I accidentally replied to this in private and then Alex replied
> but it all got lost.
>
> He said he was going to change the eeepc use KEY_RFKILL instead of
> KEY_WLAN to switch all types...
>
> So I guess what this change really does is make __rfkill_switch_all() be
> able to not only switch all devices of a given type, but also be able to
> switch all devices of all types.
>
> Alex, can you please rewrite the commit log to make that clearer?
>
> johannes
>

Thanks for your feedback, I re-wrote the comments to clarify the changes 
and re-submitted.

Cheers,
Alex Hung