From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Any value in having a netdev FAQ?
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:55:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374112504.7622.49.camel@envy.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130716025954.GC26761@windriver.com>
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 22:59 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> IMPORTANT: Do not send new net-next content to netdev during the
> period during which net-next tree is closed.
>
> Shortly after the two weeks have passed, (and vX.Y-rc1 is released) the
> tree for net-next reopens to collect content for the next (vX.Y+1) release.
So I misunderstood this line apparently. I checked Linus tree:
$ git show v3.11-rc1
tag v3.11-rc1
Tagger: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun Jul 14 15:18:41 2013 -0700
Linux 3.11-rc1
And seeing that rc1 had been tagged 3 days ago, submitted the pch_gbe
patch for MinnowBoard to netdev for net-next. David *very* politely :-)
asked me to resubmit when the net-next tree was open. It appears to me
then that we need to add a bit here about searching the archives
mentioned above for the last netdev-is-open message (I presume there is
a common subject format) to know whether a patch will be welcomed or
not.
I am not subscribed to netdev as I contribute only very rarely. Is it
considered a requirement that one be subscribed to netdev in order to
contribute? If so, we should add that here as well.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-18 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-16 2:59 [RFC] Any value in having a netdev FAQ? Paul Gortmaker
2013-07-16 20:05 ` David Miller
2013-07-16 20:34 ` Darren Hart
2013-07-16 20:35 ` Darren Hart
2013-07-17 15:08 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-07-16 20:32 ` Darren Hart
2013-07-17 15:18 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-07-17 15:56 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-18 18:21 ` Benjamin Poirier
2013-07-16 20:42 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-18 1:55 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2013-07-18 13:33 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-07-18 17:53 ` Rick Jones
2013-07-18 2:32 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1374112504.7622.49.camel@envy.home \
--to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).