netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, edumazet@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, shaoyafang@didiglobal.com,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [net-next 1/5] tcp: clean up SOCK_DEBUG()
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 22:49:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1550242187-29660-2-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1550242187-29660-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

Per discussion with Daniel[1] and Eric[2], the SOCK_DEBUG() is a very
ancient interface, which is not very useful for debugging.
So we'd better clean up it.

This patch cleans up it for TCP.

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1035573/
[2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1040533/

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 19 +------------------
 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c  |  2 --
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 7a027dec..6d2750e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3595,7 +3595,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 	 * this segment (RFC793 Section 3.9).
 	 */
 	if (after(ack, tp->snd_nxt))
-		goto invalid_ack;
+		return -1;
 
 	if (after(ack, prior_snd_una)) {
 		flag |= FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED;
@@ -3714,10 +3714,6 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 		tcp_process_tlp_ack(sk, ack, flag);
 	return 1;
 
-invalid_ack:
-	SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "Ack %u after %u:%u\n", ack, tp->snd_una, tp->snd_nxt);
-	return -1;
-
 old_ack:
 	/* If data was SACKed, tag it and see if we should send more data.
 	 * If data was DSACKed, see if we can undo a cwnd reduction.
@@ -3731,7 +3727,6 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 		tcp_xmit_recovery(sk, rexmit);
 	}
 
-	SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "Ack %u before %u:%u\n", ack, tp->snd_una, tp->snd_nxt);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -4432,13 +4427,9 @@ static void tcp_ofo_queue(struct sock *sk)
 		rb_erase(&skb->rbnode, &tp->out_of_order_queue);
 
 		if (unlikely(!after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tp->rcv_nxt))) {
-			SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "ofo packet was already received\n");
 			tcp_drop(sk, skb);
 			continue;
 		}
-		SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "ofo requeuing : rcv_next %X seq %X - %X\n",
-			   tp->rcv_nxt, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq,
-			   TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq);
 
 		tail = skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
 		eaten = tail && tcp_try_coalesce(sk, tail, skb, &fragstolen);
@@ -4502,8 +4493,6 @@ static void tcp_data_queue_ofo(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPOFOQUEUE);
 	seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
 	end_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
-	SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "out of order segment: rcv_next %X seq %X - %X\n",
-		   tp->rcv_nxt, seq, end_seq);
 
 	p = &tp->out_of_order_queue.rb_node;
 	if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&tp->out_of_order_queue)) {
@@ -4779,10 +4768,6 @@ static void tcp_data_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 	if (before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
 		/* Partial packet, seq < rcv_next < end_seq */
-		SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "partial packet: rcv_next %X seq %X - %X\n",
-			   tp->rcv_nxt, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq,
-			   TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq);
-
 		tcp_dsack_set(sk, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt);
 
 		/* If window is closed, drop tail of packet. But after
@@ -5061,8 +5046,6 @@ static int tcp_prune_queue(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
 
-	SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "prune_queue: c=%x\n", tp->copied_seq);
-
 	NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_PRUNECALLED);
 
 	if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) >= sk->sk_rcvbuf)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index e51cda7..57ef69a1 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -220,8 +220,6 @@ static int tcp_v6_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
 		u32 exthdrlen = icsk->icsk_ext_hdr_len;
 		struct sockaddr_in sin;
 
-		SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "connect: ipv4 mapped\n");
-
 		if (__ipv6_only_sock(sk))
 			return -ENETUNREACH;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-15 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-15 14:49 [net-next 0/5] clean up SOCK_DEBUG() Yafang Shao
2019-02-15 14:49 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2019-02-15 14:49 ` [net-next 2/5] x25: " Yafang Shao
2019-02-15 14:49 ` [net-next 3/5] appletalk: " Yafang Shao
2019-02-15 14:49 ` [net-next 4/5] dccp: " Yafang Shao
2019-02-15 14:49 ` [net-next 5/5] net: sock: remove the definition of SOCK_DEBUG() Yafang Shao
2019-02-15 14:58   ` Eric Dumazet
2019-02-15 15:41     ` Yafang Shao
2019-02-15 15:54       ` Eric Dumazet
2019-02-15 18:12     ` Cong Wang
2019-02-15 18:22       ` Eric Dumazet
2019-02-15 18:51         ` Joe Perches
2019-02-16  2:50           ` Yafang Shao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1550242187-29660-2-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaoyafang@didiglobal.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).