* [PATCH net] ppp: fix lockdep splat in ppp_dev_uninit()
@ 2015-09-24 10:54 Guillaume Nault
2015-09-25 19:38 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guillaume Nault @ 2015-09-24 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, David S. Miller; +Cc: Paul Mackerras, Sedat Dilek
ppp_dev_uninit() locks all_ppp_mutex while under rtnl mutex protection.
ppp_create_interface() must then lock these mutexes in that same order
to avoid possible deadlock.
[ 120.880011] ======================================================
[ 120.880011] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 120.880011] 4.2.0 #1 Not tainted
[ 120.880011] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 120.880011] ppp-apitest/15827 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 120.880011] (&pn->all_ppp_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0145f56>] ppp_dev_uninit+0x64/0xb0 [ppp_generic]
[ 120.880011]
[ 120.880011] but task is already holding lock:
[ 120.880011] (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812e4255>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
[ 120.880011]
[ 120.880011] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 120.880011]
[ 120.880011]
[ 120.880011] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 120.880011]
[ 120.880011] -> #1 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff81073a6f>] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x10e
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff813ab18a>] mutex_lock_nested+0x56/0x341
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff812e4255>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff812d9d94>] register_netdev+0x11/0x27
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffffa0147b17>] ppp_ioctl+0x289/0xc98 [ppp_generic]
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff8113b367>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4ea/0x532
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff8113b3fd>] SyS_ioctl+0x4e/0x7d
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff813ad7d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[ 120.880011]
[ 120.880011] -> #0 (&pn->all_ppp_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff8107334e>] __lock_acquire+0xb07/0xe76
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff81073a6f>] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x10e
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff813ab18a>] mutex_lock_nested+0x56/0x341
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffffa0145f56>] ppp_dev_uninit+0x64/0xb0 [ppp_generic]
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff812d5263>] rollback_registered_many+0x19e/0x252
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff812d5381>] rollback_registered+0x29/0x38
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff812d53fa>] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x6a/0x77
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffffa0146a94>] ppp_release+0x42/0x79 [ppp_generic]
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff8112d9f6>] __fput+0xec/0x192
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff8112dacc>] ____fput+0x9/0xb
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff8105447a>] task_work_run+0x66/0x80
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff81001801>] prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x8c/0xa7
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff81001900>] syscall_return_slowpath+0xe4/0x104
[ 120.880011] [<ffffffff813ad931>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f
[ 120.880011]
[ 120.880011] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 120.880011]
[ 120.880011] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 120.880011]
[ 120.880011] CPU0 CPU1
[ 120.880011] ---- ----
[ 120.880011] lock(rtnl_mutex);
[ 120.880011] lock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
[ 120.880011] lock(rtnl_mutex);
[ 120.880011] lock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
[ 120.880011]
[ 120.880011] *** DEADLOCK ***
Fixes: 8cb775bc0a34 ("ppp: fix device unregistration upon netns deletion")
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
---
drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
index 0481daf..ed00446 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
@@ -2755,6 +2755,7 @@ static struct ppp *ppp_create_interface(struct net *net, int unit,
*/
dev_net_set(dev, net);
+ rtnl_lock();
mutex_lock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
if (unit < 0) {
@@ -2785,7 +2786,7 @@ static struct ppp *ppp_create_interface(struct net *net, int unit,
ppp->file.index = unit;
sprintf(dev->name, "ppp%d", unit);
- ret = register_netdev(dev);
+ ret = register_netdevice(dev);
if (ret != 0) {
unit_put(&pn->units_idr, unit);
netdev_err(ppp->dev, "PPP: couldn't register device %s (%d)\n",
@@ -2797,6 +2798,7 @@ static struct ppp *ppp_create_interface(struct net *net, int unit,
atomic_inc(&ppp_unit_count);
mutex_unlock(&pn->all_ppp_mutex);
+ rtnl_unlock();
*retp = 0;
return ppp;
--
2.5.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] ppp: fix lockdep splat in ppp_dev_uninit()
2015-09-24 10:54 [PATCH net] ppp: fix lockdep splat in ppp_dev_uninit() Guillaume Nault
@ 2015-09-25 19:38 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2015-09-25 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: g.nault; +Cc: netdev, paulus, sedat.dilek
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:54:01 +0200
> ppp_dev_uninit() locks all_ppp_mutex while under rtnl mutex protection.
> ppp_create_interface() must then lock these mutexes in that same order
> to avoid possible deadlock.
...
> Fixes: 8cb775bc0a34 ("ppp: fix device unregistration upon netns deletion")
> Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-25 19:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-24 10:54 [PATCH net] ppp: fix lockdep splat in ppp_dev_uninit() Guillaume Nault
2015-09-25 19:38 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).