Re: [PATCH net-next] net: make skb_set_owner_w() more robust

From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	haiyangz@microsoft.com, edumazet@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: make skb_set_owner_w() more robust
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 07:18:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201511020754.lUc7VUJE%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446418728.6254.101.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1235 bytes --]

Hi Eric,

[auto build test ERROR on net-next/master -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Dumazet/net-make-skb_set_owner_w-more-robust/20151102-070107
config: x86_64-randconfig-x019-201544 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   net/core/sock.c: In function 'skb_set_owner_w':
>> net/core/sock.c:1664:21: error: 'sock_edemux' undeclared (first use in this function)
      skb->destructor = sock_edemux;
                        ^
   net/core/sock.c:1664:21: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

vim +/sock_edemux +1664 net/core/sock.c

  1658	
  1659	void skb_set_owner_w(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
  1660	{
  1661		skb_orphan(skb);
  1662		skb->sk = sk;
  1663		if (unlikely(!sk_fullsock(sk))) {
> 1664			skb->destructor = sock_edemux;
  1665			sock_hold(sk);
  1666			return;
  1667		}

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 25673 bytes --]