From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>
Cc: Tal Gilboa <talgi@mellanox.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Ariel Elior <ariel.elior@cavium.com>,
Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@chelsio.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
everest-linux-l2@cavium.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/14] PCI: Add pcie_print_link_status() to log link speed and whether it's limited
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:06:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180413140633.GD46420@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180412213249.06661048@cakuba.netronome.com>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:32:49PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:05:18 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > + if (bw_avail >= bw_cap)
> > + pci_info(dev, "%d Mb/s available bandwidth (%s x%d link)\n",
> > + bw_cap, PCIE_SPEED2STR(speed_cap), width_cap);
> > + else
> > + pci_info(dev, "%d Mb/s available bandwidth, limited by %s x%d link at %s (capable of %d Mb/s with %s x%d link)\n",
> > + bw_avail, PCIE_SPEED2STR(speed), width,
> > + limiting_dev ? pci_name(limiting_dev) : "<unknown>",
> > + bw_cap, PCIE_SPEED2STR(speed_cap), width_cap);
>
> I was just looking at using this new function to print PCIe BW for a
> NIC, but I'm slightly worried that there is nothing in the message that
> says PCIe... For a NIC some people may interpret the bandwidth as NIC
> bandwidth:
>
> [ 39.839989] nfp 0000:04:00.0: Netronome Flow Processor NFP4000/NFP6000 PCIe Card Probe
> [ 39.848943] nfp 0000:04:00.0: 63.008 Gb/s available bandwidth (8 GT/s x8 link)
> [ 39.857146] nfp 0000:04:00.0: RESERVED BARs: 0.0: General/MSI-X SRAM, 0.1: PCIe XPB/MSI-X PBA, 0.4: Explicit0, 0.5: Explicit1, fre4
>
> It's not a 63Gbps NIC... I'm sorry if this was discussed before and I
> didn't find it. Would it make sense to add the "PCIe: " prefix to the
> message like bnx2x used to do? Like:
>
> nfp 0000:04:00.0: PCIe: 63.008 Gb/s available bandwidth (8 GT/s x8 link)
I agree, that does look potentially confusing. How about this:
nfp 0000:04:00.0: 63.008 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth (8 GT/s x8 link)
I did have to look twice at this before I remembered that we're
printing Gb/s (not GB/s). Most of the references I found on the web
use GB/s when talking about total PCIe bandwidth.
But either way I think it's definitely worth mentioning PCIe
explicitly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-13 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-30 21:04 [PATCH v5 00/14] Report PCI device link status Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:04 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] PCI: Add pcie_get_speed_cap() to find max supported link speed Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:04 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] PCI: Add pcie_get_width_cap() to find max supported link width Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] PCI: Add pcie_bandwidth_capable() to compute max supported link bandwidth Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-01 20:38 ` Tal Gilboa
2018-04-02 0:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-02 7:34 ` Tal Gilboa
2018-04-02 14:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-02 14:34 ` Tal Gilboa
2018-04-02 16:00 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-04-02 19:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-03 0:30 ` Jacob Keller
2018-04-03 14:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-03 16:54 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-03-30 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] PCI: Add pcie_bandwidth_available() to compute bandwidth available to device Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-01 20:41 ` Tal Gilboa
2018-04-02 0:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] PCI: Add pcie_print_link_status() to log link speed and whether it's limited Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-02 16:25 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-04-02 19:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-02 20:25 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-04-02 21:09 ` Tal Gilboa
2018-04-13 4:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-04-13 14:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2018-04-13 15:34 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-03-30 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] net/mlx4_core: Report PCIe link properties with pcie_print_link_status() Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] net/mlx5: " Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] net/mlx5e: Use pcie_bandwidth_available() to compute bandwidth Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] bnx2x: Report PCIe link properties with pcie_print_link_status() Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:05 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] bnxt_en: " Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:06 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] cxgb4: " Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:06 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] fm10k: " Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-02 15:56 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-04-02 20:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-02 20:36 ` Keller, Jacob E
2018-03-30 21:06 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] ixgbe: " Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-30 21:06 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] PCI: Remove unused pcie_get_minimum_link() Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180413140633.GD46420@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ariel.elior@cavium.com \
--cc=everest-linux-l2@cavium.com \
--cc=ganeshgr@chelsio.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=kubakici@wp.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=talgi@mellanox.com \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).