[PATCH net-next 0/4] net/smc: fixes 2018/04/30

[PATCH net-next 0/4] net/smc: fixes 2018/04/30

[Ursula Braun]

From: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@linux.ibm.com>

Dave,

here are 4 smc patches for net-next covering different areas:
   * link health check
   * diagnostics for IPv6 smc sockets
   * ioctl
   * improvement for vlan determination

Thanks, Ursula

Karsten Graul (2):
  net/smc: periodic testlink support
  net/smc: ipv6 support for smc_diag.c

Ursula Braun (2):
  net/smc: handle ioctls SIOCINQ, SIOCOUTQ, and SIOCOUTQNSD
  net/smc: determine vlan_id of stacked net_device

 net/smc/af_smc.c   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 net/smc/smc_core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 net/smc/smc_core.h |  4 ++++
 net/smc/smc_diag.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 net/smc/smc_llc.c  | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 net/smc/smc_llc.h  |  3 +++
 net/smc/smc_wr.c   |  1 +
 7 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
2.13.5

[PATCH net-next 1/4] net/smc: periodic testlink support

[Ursula Braun]

From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>

Add periodic LLC testlink support to ensure the link is still active.
The interval time is initialized using the value of
sysctl_tcp_keepalive_time.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c   |  6 ++++--
 net/smc/smc_core.c |  2 ++
 net/smc/smc_core.h |  4 ++++
 net/smc/smc_llc.c  | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 net/smc/smc_llc.h  |  3 +++
 net/smc/smc_wr.c   |  1 +
 6 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 20aa4175b9f8..961b8eff9553 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ static void smc_copy_sock_settings_to_smc(struct smc_sock *smc)
 
 static int smc_clnt_conf_first_link(struct smc_sock *smc)
 {
+	struct net *net = sock_net(smc->clcsock->sk);
 	struct smc_link_group *lgr = smc->conn.lgr;
 	struct smc_link *link;
 	int rest;
@@ -353,7 +354,7 @@ static int smc_clnt_conf_first_link(struct smc_sock *smc)
 	if (rc < 0)
 		return SMC_CLC_DECL_TCL;
 
-	link->state = SMC_LNK_ACTIVE;
+	smc_llc_link_active(link, net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_keepalive_time);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -715,6 +716,7 @@ void smc_close_non_accepted(struct sock *sk)
 
 static int smc_serv_conf_first_link(struct smc_sock *smc)
 {
+	struct net *net = sock_net(smc->clcsock->sk);
 	struct smc_link_group *lgr = smc->conn.lgr;
 	struct smc_link *link;
 	int rest;
@@ -769,7 +771,7 @@ static int smc_serv_conf_first_link(struct smc_sock *smc)
 		return rc;
 	}
 
-	link->state = SMC_LNK_ACTIVE;
+	smc_llc_link_active(link, net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_keepalive_time);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index f44f6803f7ff..d9247765aff3 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ static void smc_lgr_free_bufs(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
 /* remove a link group */
 void smc_lgr_free(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
 {
+	smc_llc_link_flush(&lgr->lnk[SMC_SINGLE_LINK]);
 	smc_lgr_free_bufs(lgr);
 	smc_link_clear(&lgr->lnk[SMC_SINGLE_LINK]);
 	kfree(lgr);
@@ -332,6 +333,7 @@ void smc_lgr_terminate(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
 	struct rb_node *node;
 
 	smc_lgr_forget(lgr);
+	smc_llc_link_inactive(&lgr->lnk[SMC_SINGLE_LINK]);
 
 	write_lock_bh(&lgr->conns_lock);
 	node = rb_first(&lgr->conns_all);
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.h b/net/smc/smc_core.h
index 07e2a393e6d9..97339f03ba79 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.h
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct smc_link {
 	dma_addr_t		wr_rx_dma_addr;	/* DMA address of wr_rx_bufs */
 	u64			wr_rx_id;	/* seq # of last recv WR */
 	u32			wr_rx_cnt;	/* number of WR recv buffers */
+	unsigned long		wr_rx_tstamp;	/* jiffies when last buf rx */
 
 	struct ib_reg_wr	wr_reg;		/* WR register memory region */
 	wait_queue_head_t	wr_reg_wait;	/* wait for wr_reg result */
@@ -101,6 +102,9 @@ struct smc_link {
 	int			llc_confirm_resp_rc; /* rc from conf_resp msg */
 	struct completion	llc_add;	/* wait for rx of add link */
 	struct completion	llc_add_resp;	/* wait for rx of add link rsp*/
+	struct delayed_work	llc_testlink_wrk; /* testlink worker */
+	struct completion	llc_testlink_resp; /* wait for rx of testlink */
+	int			llc_testlink_time; /* testlink interval */
 };
 
 /* For now we just allow one parallel link per link group. The SMC protocol
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
index ea4b21981b4b..33b4d856f4c6 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
@@ -397,7 +397,8 @@ static void smc_llc_rx_test_link(struct smc_link *link,
 				 struct smc_llc_msg_test_link *llc)
 {
 	if (llc->hd.flags & SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP) {
-		/* unused as long as we don't send this type of msg */
+		if (link->state == SMC_LNK_ACTIVE)
+			complete(&link->llc_testlink_resp);
 	} else {
 		smc_llc_send_test_link(link, llc->user_data, SMC_LLC_RESP);
 	}
@@ -502,6 +503,65 @@ static void smc_llc_rx_handler(struct ib_wc *wc, void *buf)
 	}
 }
 
+/***************************** worker ****************************************/
+
+static void smc_llc_testlink_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct smc_link *link = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
+					     struct smc_link, llc_testlink_wrk);
+	unsigned long next_interval;
+	struct smc_link_group *lgr;
+	unsigned long expire_time;
+	u8 user_data[16] = { 0 };
+	int rc;
+
+	lgr = container_of(link, struct smc_link_group, lnk[SMC_SINGLE_LINK]);
+	if (link->state != SMC_LNK_ACTIVE)
+		return;		/* don't reschedule worker */
+	expire_time = link->wr_rx_tstamp + link->llc_testlink_time;
+	if (time_is_after_jiffies(expire_time)) {
+		next_interval = expire_time - jiffies;
+		goto out;
+	}
+	reinit_completion(&link->llc_testlink_resp);
+	smc_llc_send_test_link(link, user_data, SMC_LLC_REQ);
+	/* receive TEST LINK response over RoCE fabric */
+	rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&link->llc_testlink_resp,
+						       SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME);
+	if (rc <= 0) {
+		smc_lgr_terminate(lgr);
+		return;
+	}
+	next_interval = link->llc_testlink_time;
+out:
+	schedule_delayed_work(&link->llc_testlink_wrk, next_interval);
+}
+
+void smc_llc_link_active(struct smc_link *link, int testlink_time)
+{
+	init_completion(&link->llc_testlink_resp);
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&link->llc_testlink_wrk, smc_llc_testlink_work);
+	link->state = SMC_LNK_ACTIVE;
+	if (testlink_time) {
+		link->llc_testlink_time = testlink_time * HZ;
+		schedule_delayed_work(&link->llc_testlink_wrk,
+				      link->llc_testlink_time);
+	}
+}
+
+/* called in tasklet context */
+void smc_llc_link_inactive(struct smc_link *link)
+{
+	link->state = SMC_LNK_INACTIVE;
+	cancel_delayed_work(&link->llc_testlink_wrk);
+}
+
+/* called in worker context */
+void smc_llc_link_flush(struct smc_link *link)
+{
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&link->llc_testlink_wrk);
+}
+
 /***************************** init, exit, misc ******************************/
 
 static struct smc_wr_rx_handler smc_llc_rx_handlers[] = {
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.h b/net/smc/smc_llc.h
index e4a7d5e234d5..d6e42116485e 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.h
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ int smc_llc_send_delete_link(struct smc_link *link,
 			     enum smc_llc_reqresp reqresp);
 int smc_llc_send_test_link(struct smc_link *lnk, u8 user_data[16],
 			   enum smc_llc_reqresp reqresp);
+void smc_llc_link_active(struct smc_link *link, int testlink_time);
+void smc_llc_link_inactive(struct smc_link *link);
+void smc_llc_link_flush(struct smc_link *link);
 int smc_llc_init(void) __init;
 
 #endif /* SMC_LLC_H */
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_wr.c b/net/smc/smc_wr.c
index 1b8af23e6e2b..cc7c1bb60fe8 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_wr.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_wr.c
@@ -376,6 +376,7 @@ static inline void smc_wr_rx_process_cqes(struct ib_wc wc[], int num)
 	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
 		link = wc[i].qp->qp_context;
 		if (wc[i].status == IB_WC_SUCCESS) {
+			link->wr_rx_tstamp = jiffies;
 			smc_wr_rx_demultiplex(&wc[i]);
 			smc_wr_rx_post(link); /* refill WR RX */
 		} else {
-- 
2.13.5

[PATCH net-next 2/4] net/smc: ipv6 support for smc_diag.c

[Ursula Braun]

From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>

Update smc_diag.c to support ipv6 addresses on the diagnosis interface.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_diag.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_diag.c b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
index 427b91c1c964..9a8d0db7bb88 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_diag.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
@@ -38,17 +38,25 @@ static void smc_diag_msg_common_fill(struct smc_diag_msg *r, struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct smc_sock *smc = smc_sk(sk);
 
-	r->diag_family = sk->sk_family;
 	if (!smc->clcsock)
 		return;
 	r->id.idiag_sport = htons(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_num);
 	r->id.idiag_dport = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_dport;
 	r->id.idiag_if = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
 	sock_diag_save_cookie(sk, r->id.idiag_cookie);
-	memset(&r->id.idiag_src, 0, sizeof(r->id.idiag_src));
-	memset(&r->id.idiag_dst, 0, sizeof(r->id.idiag_dst));
-	r->id.idiag_src[0] = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
-	r->id.idiag_dst[0] = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_daddr;
+	if (sk->sk_protocol == SMCPROTO_SMC6) {
+		r->diag_family = PF_INET6;
+		memcpy(&r->id.idiag_src, &smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr,
+		       sizeof(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr));
+		memcpy(&r->id.idiag_dst, &smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_daddr,
+		       sizeof(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_daddr));
+	} else {
+		r->diag_family = PF_INET;
+		memset(&r->id.idiag_src, 0, sizeof(r->id.idiag_src));
+		memset(&r->id.idiag_dst, 0, sizeof(r->id.idiag_dst));
+		r->id.idiag_src[0] = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
+		r->id.idiag_dst[0] = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_daddr;
+	}
 }
 
 static int smc_diag_msg_attrs_fill(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
@@ -153,7 +161,8 @@ static int __smc_diag_dump(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return -EMSGSIZE;
 }
 
-static int smc_diag_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
+static int smc_diag_dump_proto(struct proto *prot, struct sk_buff *skb,
+			       struct netlink_callback *cb)
 {
 	struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
 	struct nlattr *bc = NULL;
@@ -161,8 +170,8 @@ static int smc_diag_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 	struct sock *sk;
 	int rc = 0;
 
-	read_lock(&smc_proto.h.smc_hash->lock);
-	head = &smc_proto.h.smc_hash->ht;
+	read_lock(&prot->h.smc_hash->lock);
+	head = &prot->h.smc_hash->ht;
 	if (hlist_empty(head))
 		goto out;
 
@@ -175,7 +184,17 @@ static int smc_diag_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 	}
 
 out:
-	read_unlock(&smc_proto.h.smc_hash->lock);
+	read_unlock(&prot->h.smc_hash->lock);
+	return rc;
+}
+
+static int smc_diag_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
+{
+	int rc = 0;
+
+	rc = smc_diag_dump_proto(&smc_proto, skb, cb);
+	if (!rc)
+		rc = smc_diag_dump_proto(&smc_proto6, skb, cb);
 	return rc;
 }
 
-- 
2.13.5

[PATCH net-next 3/4] net/smc: handle ioctls SIOCINQ, SIOCOUTQ, and SIOCOUTQNSD

[Ursula Braun]

SIOCINQ returns the amount of unread data in the RMB.
SIOCOUTQ returns the amount of unsent or unacked sent data in the send
buffer.
SIOCOUTQNSD returns the amount of data prepared for sending, but
not yet sent.

Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 961b8eff9553..823ea3371575 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <net/sock.h>
 #include <net/tcp.h>
 #include <net/smc.h>
+#include <asm/ioctls.h>
 
 #include "smc.h"
 #include "smc_clc.h"
@@ -1389,12 +1390,38 @@ static int smc_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
 		     unsigned long arg)
 {
 	struct smc_sock *smc;
+	int answ;
 
 	smc = smc_sk(sock->sk);
-	if (smc->use_fallback)
+	if (smc->use_fallback) {
+		if (!smc->clcsock)
+			return -EBADF;
 		return smc->clcsock->ops->ioctl(smc->clcsock, cmd, arg);
-	else
-		return sock_no_ioctl(sock, cmd, arg);
+	}
+	switch (cmd) {
+	case SIOCINQ: /* same as FIONREAD */
+		if (smc->sk.sk_state == SMC_LISTEN)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		answ = atomic_read(&smc->conn.bytes_to_rcv);
+		break;
+	case SIOCOUTQ:
+		/* output queue size (not send + not acked) */
+		if (smc->sk.sk_state == SMC_LISTEN)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		answ = smc->conn.sndbuf_size -
+					atomic_read(&smc->conn.sndbuf_space);
+		break;
+	case SIOCOUTQNSD:
+		/* output queue size (not send only) */
+		if (smc->sk.sk_state == SMC_LISTEN)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		answ = smc_tx_prepared_sends(&smc->conn);
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
+	}
+
+	return put_user(answ, (int __user *)arg);
 }
 
 static ssize_t smc_sendpage(struct socket *sock, struct page *page,
-- 
2.13.5

[PATCH net-next 4/4] net/smc: determine vlan_id of stacked net_device

[Ursula Braun]

An SMC link group is bound to a specific vlan_id. Its link uses
the RoCE-GIDs established for the specific vlan_id. This patch makes
sure the appropriate vlan_id is determined for stacked scenarios like
for instance a master bonding device with vlan devices enslaved.

Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index d9247765aff3..1f3ea62fac5c 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -360,7 +360,8 @@ void smc_lgr_terminate(struct smc_link_group *lgr)
 static int smc_vlan_by_tcpsk(struct socket *clcsock, unsigned short *vlan_id)
 {
 	struct dst_entry *dst = sk_dst_get(clcsock->sk);
-	int rc = 0;
+	struct net_device *ndev;
+	int i, nest_lvl, rc = 0;
 
 	*vlan_id = 0;
 	if (!dst) {
@@ -372,8 +373,27 @@ static int smc_vlan_by_tcpsk(struct socket *clcsock, unsigned short *vlan_id)
 		goto out_rel;
 	}
 
-	if (is_vlan_dev(dst->dev))
-		*vlan_id = vlan_dev_vlan_id(dst->dev);
+	ndev = dst->dev;
+	if (is_vlan_dev(ndev)) {
+		*vlan_id = vlan_dev_vlan_id(ndev);
+		goto out_rel;
+	}
+
+	rtnl_lock();
+	nest_lvl = dev_get_nest_level(ndev);
+	for (i = 0; i < nest_lvl; i++) {
+		struct list_head *lower = &ndev->adj_list.lower;
+
+		if (list_empty(lower))
+			break;
+		lower = lower->next;
+		ndev = (struct net_device *)netdev_lower_get_next(ndev, &lower);
+		if (is_vlan_dev(ndev)) {
+			*vlan_id = vlan_dev_vlan_id(ndev);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	rtnl_unlock();
 
 out_rel:
 	dst_release(dst);
-- 
2.13.5

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net/smc: ipv6 support for smc_diag.c

[kbuild test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6126 bytes --]

Hi Karsten,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ursula-Braun/net-smc-periodic-testlink-support/20180501-045940
config: x86_64-randconfig-x016-201817 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/sock_diag.h:8:0,
                    from net/smc/smc_diag.c:15:
   net/smc/smc_diag.c: In function 'smc_diag_msg_common_fill':
>> include/net/sock.h:350:37: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_rcv_saddr'; did you mean 'skc_rcv_saddr'?
    #define sk_v6_rcv_saddr __sk_common.skc_v6_rcv_saddr
                                        ^
>> net/smc/smc_diag.c:49:47: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_rcv_saddr'
      memcpy(&r->id.idiag_src, &smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr,
                                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/net/sock.h:350:37: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_rcv_saddr'; did you mean 'skc_rcv_saddr'?
    #define sk_v6_rcv_saddr __sk_common.skc_v6_rcv_saddr
                                        ^
   net/smc/smc_diag.c:50:35: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_rcv_saddr'
             sizeof(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr));
                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/net/sock.h:349:34: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_daddr'; did you mean 'skc_daddr'?
    #define sk_v6_daddr  __sk_common.skc_v6_daddr
                                     ^
>> net/smc/smc_diag.c:51:47: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_daddr'
      memcpy(&r->id.idiag_dst, &smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_daddr,
                                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/net/sock.h:349:34: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_daddr'; did you mean 'skc_daddr'?
    #define sk_v6_daddr  __sk_common.skc_v6_daddr
                                     ^
   net/smc/smc_diag.c:52:35: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_daddr'
             sizeof(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_daddr));
                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~
--
   In file included from include/linux/sock_diag.h:8:0,
                    from net//smc/smc_diag.c:15:
   net//smc/smc_diag.c: In function 'smc_diag_msg_common_fill':
>> include/net/sock.h:350:37: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_rcv_saddr'; did you mean 'skc_rcv_saddr'?
    #define sk_v6_rcv_saddr __sk_common.skc_v6_rcv_saddr
                                        ^
   net//smc/smc_diag.c:49:47: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_rcv_saddr'
      memcpy(&r->id.idiag_src, &smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr,
                                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/net/sock.h:350:37: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_rcv_saddr'; did you mean 'skc_rcv_saddr'?
    #define sk_v6_rcv_saddr __sk_common.skc_v6_rcv_saddr
                                        ^
   net//smc/smc_diag.c:50:35: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_rcv_saddr'
             sizeof(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr));
                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/net/sock.h:349:34: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_daddr'; did you mean 'skc_daddr'?
    #define sk_v6_daddr  __sk_common.skc_v6_daddr
                                     ^
   net//smc/smc_diag.c:51:47: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_daddr'
      memcpy(&r->id.idiag_dst, &smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_daddr,
                                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/net/sock.h:349:34: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_daddr'; did you mean 'skc_daddr'?
    #define sk_v6_daddr  __sk_common.skc_v6_daddr
                                     ^
   net//smc/smc_diag.c:52:35: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_daddr'
             sizeof(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_daddr));
                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~

vim +/sk_v6_rcv_saddr +49 net/smc/smc_diag.c

  > 15	#include <linux/sock_diag.h>
    16	#include <linux/inet_diag.h>
    17	#include <linux/smc_diag.h>
    18	#include <net/netlink.h>
    19	#include <net/smc.h>
    20	
    21	#include "smc.h"
    22	#include "smc_core.h"
    23	
    24	static void smc_gid_be16_convert(__u8 *buf, u8 *gid_raw)
    25	{
    26		sprintf(buf, "%04x:%04x:%04x:%04x:%04x:%04x:%04x:%04x",
    27			be16_to_cpu(((__be16 *)gid_raw)[0]),
    28			be16_to_cpu(((__be16 *)gid_raw)[1]),
    29			be16_to_cpu(((__be16 *)gid_raw)[2]),
    30			be16_to_cpu(((__be16 *)gid_raw)[3]),
    31			be16_to_cpu(((__be16 *)gid_raw)[4]),
    32			be16_to_cpu(((__be16 *)gid_raw)[5]),
    33			be16_to_cpu(((__be16 *)gid_raw)[6]),
    34			be16_to_cpu(((__be16 *)gid_raw)[7]));
    35	}
    36	
    37	static void smc_diag_msg_common_fill(struct smc_diag_msg *r, struct sock *sk)
    38	{
    39		struct smc_sock *smc = smc_sk(sk);
    40	
    41		if (!smc->clcsock)
    42			return;
    43		r->id.idiag_sport = htons(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_num);
    44		r->id.idiag_dport = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_dport;
    45		r->id.idiag_if = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
    46		sock_diag_save_cookie(sk, r->id.idiag_cookie);
    47		if (sk->sk_protocol == SMCPROTO_SMC6) {
    48			r->diag_family = PF_INET6;
  > 49			memcpy(&r->id.idiag_src, &smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr,
  > 50			       sizeof(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr));
  > 51			memcpy(&r->id.idiag_dst, &smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_daddr,
    52			       sizeof(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_v6_daddr));
    53		} else {
    54			r->diag_family = PF_INET;
    55			memset(&r->id.idiag_src, 0, sizeof(r->id.idiag_src));
    56			memset(&r->id.idiag_dst, 0, sizeof(r->id.idiag_dst));
    57			r->id.idiag_src[0] = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr;
    58			r->id.idiag_dst[0] = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_daddr;
    59		}
    60	}
    61	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 30034 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net/smc: fixes 2018/04/30

[David Miller]

From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:51:15 +0200

> From: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Dave,
> 
> here are 4 smc patches for net-next covering different areas:
>    * link health check
>    * diagnostics for IPv6 smc sockets
>    * ioctl
>    * improvement for vlan determination

You say "fixes" in your Subject line but adding ipv6 smc
socket diag support is a feature not a fix.

Actually, generally speaking your patch submissions are
confusing.

You do submit really pure bug fixes, but for some odd
reason you target the net-next tree instead of net.

Maybe you have a good reason for doing this and you can
explain it to me?

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net/smc: fixes 2018/04/30

[Ursula Braun]

On 05/01/2018 03:03 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:51:15 +0200
> 
>> From: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> here are 4 smc patches for net-next covering different areas:
>>    * link health check
>>    * diagnostics for IPv6 smc sockets
>>    * ioctl
>>    * improvement for vlan determination
> 
> You say "fixes" in your Subject line but adding ipv6 smc
> socket diag support is a feature not a fix.

Sorry, I just reused my old subject pattern without reflecting it.
These 4 patches are new features for SMC, and thus the title
should have been "net/smc: features 2018/04/30".

I am going to send v2 with such a title.

> 
> Actually, generally speaking your patch submissions are
> confusing.
> 
> You do submit really pure bug fixes, but for some odd
> reason you target the net-next tree instead of net.
>

> Maybe you have a good reason for doing this and you can
> explain it to me?
> 

Currently we just have one patch queue for upstream posting and
do not separate smc bug fixes from smc features. It is easier to
keep this patch queue and send them for net-next. Thus in the past
I have submitted bug fixes regarded as minor for net-next as well.
But in future I will send pure bug fixes always for net.