* general protection fault in __xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx
@ 2019-01-29 9:22 syzbot
2019-01-29 9:41 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2019-01-29 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, herbert, linux-kernel, netdev, steffen.klassert, syzkaller-bugs
Hello,
syzbot found the following crash on:
HEAD commit: 085c4c7dd2b6 net: lmc: remove -I. header search path
git tree: net-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12347128c00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=505743eba4e4f68
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97
compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
netlink: 104 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process
`syz-executor0'.
device sit0 left promiscuous mode
kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
netlink: 'syz-executor1': attribute type 2 has an invalid length.
CPU: 1 PID: 6717 Comm: syz-executor0 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3+ #24
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:__xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx.constprop.0+0xe4/0x470
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1618
Code: 00 e8 50 40 c3 fa 49 83 ec 08 0f 84 df 02 00 00 e8 41 40 c3 fa 49 8d
bc 24 19 02 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 fa 48 c1 e8 03 83 e2 07 <42> 0f b6 04 38
38 d0 7f 08 84 c0 0f 85 eb 02 00 00 45 0f b6 ac 24
kobject: 'loop4' (00000000b3bda7f3): kobject_uevent_env
RSP: 0018:ffff888065bff0e8 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000005800000042 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffc90005deb000
RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff86bebeaf RDI: 000002c000000213
RBP: ffff888065bff148 R08: ffff8880568ce080 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff8880568ce080 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000002bffffffffa
R13: 00000000000000ff R14: ffff88806bae3290 R15: dffffc0000000000
kobject: 'loop4' (00000000b3bda7f3): fill_kobj_path: path
= '/devices/virtual/block/loop4'
FS: 00007f39763ec700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000000073c000 CR3: 0000000089628000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx+0x944/0x1020 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1664
xfrm_get_policy+0x67b/0x1160 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1887
xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x458/0x8d0 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:2663
netlink_rcv_skb+0x17d/0x410 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2485
xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x70/0x90 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:2671
netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1310 [inline]
netlink_unicast+0x574/0x770 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1336
netlink_sendmsg+0xa05/0xf90 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1925
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:621 [inline]
sock_sendmsg+0xdd/0x130 net/socket.c:631
___sys_sendmsg+0x7ec/0x910 net/socket.c:2116
__sys_sendmsg+0x112/0x270 net/socket.c:2154
__do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2163 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2161 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xb0 net/socket.c:2161
do_syscall_64+0x1a3/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x458099
Code: 6d b7 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7
48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff
ff 0f 83 3b b7 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f39763ebc78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000458099
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000002014f000 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 000000000073bf00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f39763ec6d4
R13: 00000000004c56af R14: 00000000004d9420 R15: 00000000ffffffff
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 6bda763f27a7462f ]---
RIP: 0010:__xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx.constprop.0+0xe4/0x470
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1618
Code: 00 e8 50 40 c3 fa 49 83 ec 08 0f 84 df 02 00 00 e8 41 40 c3 fa 49 8d
bc 24 19 02 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 fa 48 c1 e8 03 83 e2 07 <42> 0f b6 04 38
38 d0 7f 08 84 c0 0f 85 eb 02 00 00 45 0f b6 ac 24
RSP: 0018:ffff888065bff0e8 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000005800000042 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffc90005deb000
RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffff86bebeaf RDI: 000002c000000213
RBP: ffff888065bff148 R08: ffff8880568ce080 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff8880568ce080 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000002bffffffffa
R13: 00000000000000ff R14: ffff88806bae3290 R15: dffffc0000000000
FS: 00007f39763ec700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000000073c000 CR3: 0000000089628000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
---
This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bug-status-tracking for how to communicate with
syzbot.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: general protection fault in __xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx
2019-01-29 9:22 general protection fault in __xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx syzbot
@ 2019-01-29 9:41 ` Florian Westphal
2019-01-30 14:03 ` Dmitry Vyukov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2019-01-29 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot
Cc: davem, herbert, linux-kernel, netdev, steffen.klassert, syzkaller-bugs
syzbot <syzbot+e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following crash on:
>
> HEAD commit: 085c4c7dd2b6 net: lmc: remove -I. header search path
> git tree: net-next
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12347128c00000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=505743eba4e4f68
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
net-next doesn't contain the fixes for the rbtree fallout yet, so
this might already be fixed (fingers crossed).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: general protection fault in __xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx
2019-01-29 9:41 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2019-01-30 14:03 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-30 14:20 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2019-01-30 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal
Cc: syzbot, David Miller, Herbert Xu, LKML, netdev, Steffen Klassert,
syzkaller-bugs
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:41 AM Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
>
> syzbot <syzbot+e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > syzbot found the following crash on:
> >
> > HEAD commit: 085c4c7dd2b6 net: lmc: remove -I. header search path
> > git tree: net-next
> > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12347128c00000
> > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=505743eba4e4f68
> > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97
> > compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
>
> net-next doesn't contain the fixes for the rbtree fallout yet, so
> this might already be fixed (fingers crossed).
Hi Florian,
What is that fix for the record?
We will need to close this later. Or perhaps we can already mark this
as fixed by that patch with "#syz fix:" command?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: general protection fault in __xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx
2019-01-30 14:03 ` Dmitry Vyukov
@ 2019-01-30 14:20 ` Florian Westphal
2019-01-30 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2019-01-30 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Vyukov
Cc: Florian Westphal, syzbot, David Miller, Herbert Xu, LKML, netdev,
Steffen Klassert, syzkaller-bugs
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> > syzbot <syzbot+e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > syzbot found the following crash on:
> > >
> > > HEAD commit: 085c4c7dd2b6 net: lmc: remove -I. header search path
> > > git tree: net-next
> > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12347128c00000
> > > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=505743eba4e4f68
> > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97
> > > compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
> >
> > net-next doesn't contain the fixes for the rbtree fallout yet, so
> > this might already be fixed (fingers crossed).
>
> Hi Florian,
>
> What is that fix for the record?
I don't know. I managed to add every bug class imagineable in that series 8-(
The last (most recent) fix from the 'fallout cleanup' is:
12750abad517a991c4568969bc748db302ab52cd
("xfrm: policy: fix infinite loop when merging src-nodes")
so if syzkaller can generate a splat with that change present
something is still broken.
> We will need to close this later. Or perhaps we can already mark this
> as fixed by that patch with "#syz fix:" command?
There are a lot of open xfrm related splats that could all be explained
by the rbtree bugs (one had a reproducer, the fix has appropriate
reported-by tag).
It would be great if there was a way to tell syzkaller to report those
again if they still appear.
I could pretend and claim above commit as "sys-fix", but it seems fishy.
Let me know and I can tag all of them.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: general protection fault in __xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx
2019-01-30 14:20 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2019-01-30 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-31 8:49 ` Dmitry Vyukov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2019-01-30 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal
Cc: syzbot, David Miller, Herbert Xu, LKML, netdev, Steffen Klassert,
syzkaller-bugs
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:20 PM Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
>
> Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> > > syzbot <syzbot+e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > syzbot found the following crash on:
> > > >
> > > > HEAD commit: 085c4c7dd2b6 net: lmc: remove -I. header search path
> > > > git tree: net-next
> > > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12347128c00000
> > > > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=505743eba4e4f68
> > > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97
> > > > compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
> > >
> > > net-next doesn't contain the fixes for the rbtree fallout yet, so
> > > this might already be fixed (fingers crossed).
> >
> > Hi Florian,
> >
> > What is that fix for the record?
>
> I don't know. I managed to add every bug class imagineable in that series 8-(
>
> The last (most recent) fix from the 'fallout cleanup' is:
> 12750abad517a991c4568969bc748db302ab52cd
> ("xfrm: policy: fix infinite loop when merging src-nodes")
>
> so if syzkaller can generate a splat with that change present
> something is still broken.
>
> > We will need to close this later. Or perhaps we can already mark this
> > as fixed by that patch with "#syz fix:" command?
>
> There are a lot of open xfrm related splats that could all be explained
> by the rbtree bugs (one had a reproducer, the fix has appropriate
> reported-by tag).
>
> It would be great if there was a way to tell syzkaller to report those
> again if they still appear.
That's exactly what "#syz fix:" will do.
syzbot will wait until the fixing commit appears in all builds/trees
it tests, then close this bug, and then any new similarly looking
crash will produce a new bug report. So if the patch indeed fixes the
bug, then the bug will be closed and we are done. If it does not fix
this bug, then we will get another report but at that time on a tree
that includes the commit.
> I could pretend and claim above commit as "sys-fix", but it seems fishy.
>
> Let me know and I can tag all of them.
It's "safe" to mark these crashes as fixed when we are not 100% sure
in the sense that we won't lose the bug (it will be reported again
later if it's not fixed).
It's also useful to keep the list of open/active bugs shorter and more
precise (don't leave too many obsoleted open bugs). What happened
multiple times is that a bug was fixed but left open, and then a
similarly looking crashes started happening again (a new bug), but it
wasn't reported by syzbot because for syzbot it looked like the old
still unfixed bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: general protection fault in __xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx
2019-01-30 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov
@ 2019-01-31 8:49 ` Dmitry Vyukov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Vyukov @ 2019-01-31 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal
Cc: syzbot, David Miller, Herbert Xu, LKML, netdev, Steffen Klassert,
syzkaller-bugs
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:30 PM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:20 PM Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> >
> > Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> > > > syzbot <syzbot+e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > syzbot found the following crash on:
> > > > >
> > > > > HEAD commit: 085c4c7dd2b6 net: lmc: remove -I. header search path
> > > > > git tree: net-next
> > > > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12347128c00000
> > > > > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=505743eba4e4f68
> > > > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e6e1fe9148cffa18cf97
> > > > > compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
> > > >
> > > > net-next doesn't contain the fixes for the rbtree fallout yet, so
> > > > this might already be fixed (fingers crossed).
> > >
> > > Hi Florian,
> > >
> > > What is that fix for the record?
> >
> > I don't know. I managed to add every bug class imagineable in that series 8-(
> >
> > The last (most recent) fix from the 'fallout cleanup' is:
> > 12750abad517a991c4568969bc748db302ab52cd
> > ("xfrm: policy: fix infinite loop when merging src-nodes")
> >
> > so if syzkaller can generate a splat with that change present
> > something is still broken.
> >
> > > We will need to close this later. Or perhaps we can already mark this
> > > as fixed by that patch with "#syz fix:" command?
> >
> > There are a lot of open xfrm related splats that could all be explained
> > by the rbtree bugs (one had a reproducer, the fix has appropriate
> > reported-by tag).
> >
> > It would be great if there was a way to tell syzkaller to report those
> > again if they still appear.
>
> That's exactly what "#syz fix:" will do.
> syzbot will wait until the fixing commit appears in all builds/trees
> it tests, then close this bug, and then any new similarly looking
> crash will produce a new bug report. So if the patch indeed fixes the
> bug, then the bug will be closed and we are done. If it does not fix
> this bug, then we will get another report but at that time on a tree
> that includes the commit.
>
> > I could pretend and claim above commit as "sys-fix", but it seems fishy.
> >
> > Let me know and I can tag all of them.
>
> It's "safe" to mark these crashes as fixed when we are not 100% sure
> in the sense that we won't lose the bug (it will be reported again
> later if it's not fixed).
> It's also useful to keep the list of open/active bugs shorter and more
> precise (don't leave too many obsoleted open bugs). What happened
> multiple times is that a bug was fixed but left open, and then a
> similarly looking crashes started happening again (a new bug), but it
> wasn't reported by syzbot because for syzbot it looked like the old
> still unfixed bug.
Thanks for cleaning it all up!
(Florian updated 17 other bugs)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-31 8:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-29 9:22 general protection fault in __xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx syzbot
2019-01-29 9:41 ` Florian Westphal
2019-01-30 14:03 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-30 14:20 ` Florian Westphal
2019-01-30 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-31 8:49 ` Dmitry Vyukov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).