netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 09/26] net/mlx5e: Init ethtool steering for representors
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:16:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200414151645.GE1068@sasha-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3xEMhnXZB-HU7aL3m9A1N_GPxgOC3U4skF_qWL8z3wnvSKPw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:38:32PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:09 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 01:22:59PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> > IMHO - I think it should be the other way around, you should get approval
>> > from sub-system maintainers to put their code in charge into auto-selection,
>> > unless there's kernel summit decision that says otherwise, is this documented
>> > anywhere?
>>
>> No, we can't get make this a "only take if I agree" as there are _many_
>> subsystem maintainers who today never mark anything for stable trees, as
>> they just can't be bothered.  And that's fine, stable trees should not
>> take up any extra maintainer time if they do not want to do so.  So it's
>> simpler to do an opt-out when asked for.
>
>OK, but I must say I am worried from the comment made here:
>
>"I'm not sure what a fixes tag has to do with inclusion in a stable tree"
>
>This patch
>
>(A) was pushed to -next and not -rc kernel

Fixes can (and should) come in during a merge window as well. They are
not put on hold until the -rc releases.

>(B) doesn't have fixes tag

In the 4.19 stable tree there are 3962 commits explicitly tagged for
stable, only 2382 of them have a fixes tag. 

>(C) the change log state clearly that what's being "fixed"
>can't be reproduced on any earlier kernel [..] "only possible
>to reproduce with next commit in this series"
>
>but it was selected for -stable -- at least if the fixes tag was used
>as gating criteria, this wrong stable inclusion could have been eliminated

Are you suggesting that a commit without a fixes tag is never a fix?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-14 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-11 23:13 [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 01/26] net: wan: wanxl: use allow to pass CROSS_COMPILE_M68k for rebuilding firmware Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:13 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 02/26] net: phy: probe PHY drivers synchronously Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:13 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 04/26] net: phy: mscc: accept all RGMII species in vsc85xx_mac_if_set Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:13 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 06/26] mwifiex: set needed_headroom, not hard_header_len Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:13 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 07/26] Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle l2cap config request during open state Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:13 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 09/26] net/mlx5e: Init ethtool steering for representors Sasha Levin
2020-04-12  7:10   ` Or Gerlitz
2020-04-12 17:59     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-04-12 18:29       ` Or Gerlitz
2020-04-14  1:56       ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-14  7:16         ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-14 10:22         ` Or Gerlitz
2020-04-14 11:09           ` Greg KH
2020-04-14 14:38             ` Or Gerlitz
2020-04-14 15:16               ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2020-04-14 15:49               ` Edward Cree
2020-04-14 17:37                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-14 19:03                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-04-14 21:00                   ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-14 22:50                   ` Michal Kubecek
2020-04-15  5:31                     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-15 14:07                     ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-14 20:57                 ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-15 16:18                   ` Edward Cree
2020-04-16  0:00                     ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-16  4:08                       ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-16  5:24                         ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-16 13:30                           ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-16 19:07                             ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-16 19:58                               ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-16 21:08                                 ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-17  8:28                                   ` gregkh
2020-04-17 22:23                                     ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-18 10:51                                       ` gregkh
2020-04-17 13:21                                   ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-17 22:38                                     ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-16 13:40                       ` Or Gerlitz
2020-04-16 14:04                         ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-16 14:17                           ` Or Gerlitz
2020-04-16 14:36                             ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-16 17:20                         ` Greg KH
2020-04-16 19:31                           ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-16 19:53                             ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-16 21:32                               ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-16 23:23                                 ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-21  3:07                                   ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-16 20:08                             ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-04-16 21:11                               ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-04-17  8:25                                 ` gregkh
2020-04-16 16:06                       ` Edward Cree
2020-04-16 18:49                         ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-20 11:45                           ` Edward Cree
2020-04-20 12:53                             ` Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:13 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 10/26] Bluetooth: Fix calculation of SCO handle for packet processing Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:13 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 11/26] Bluetooth: guard against controllers sending zero'd events Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:14 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 13/26] net: intel: e1000e: fix possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in e1000e_get_hw_semaphore() Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:14 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 19/26] Bluetooth: RFCOMM: fix ODEBUG bug in rfcomm_dev_ioctl Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:14 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 20/26] brcmfmac: Fix driver crash on USB control transfer timeout Sasha Levin
2020-04-11 23:14 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 26/26] svcrdma: Fix leak of transport addresses Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200414151645.GE1068@sasha-vm \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gerlitz.or@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).