From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: [net-next 16/17] e1000e: Disable TSO for buffer overrun workaround
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 19:51:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200523025109.3313635-17-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200523025109.3313635-1-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Commit b10effb92e27 ("e1000e: fix buffer overrun while the I219 is
processing DMA transactions") imposes roughly 30% performance penalty.
The commit log states that "Disabling TSO eliminates performance loss
for TCP traffic without a noticeable impact on CPU performance", so
let's disable TSO by default to regain the loss.
CC: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: b10effb92e27 ("e1000e: fix buffer overrun while the I219 is processing DMA transactions")
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1802691
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index e0b074820b47..66609cf689de 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -5294,6 +5294,10 @@ static void e1000_watchdog_task(struct work_struct *work)
/* oops */
break;
}
+ if (hw->mac.type == e1000_pch_spt) {
+ netdev->features &= ~NETIF_F_TSO;
+ netdev->features &= ~NETIF_F_TSO6;
+ }
}
/* enable transmits in the hardware, need to do this
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-23 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-23 2:50 [net-next 00/17][pull request] 1GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2020-05-22 Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 01/17] igc: Refactor igc_ethtool_add_nfc_rule() Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 02/17] igc: Fix 'sw_idx' type in struct igc_nfc_rule Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 03/17] igc: Fix locking issue when retrieving NFC rules Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 04/17] igc: Fix NFC rule overwrite cases Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 05/17] igc: Fix NFC rules with multicast addresses Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 06/17] igc: Fix NFC rules restoration Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 07/17] igc: Refactor igc_ethtool_update_nfc_rule() Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 08/17] igc: Fix NFC rules leak when driver is unloaded Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 09/17] igc: Fix NFC rule validation Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 10/17] igc: Change return type from igc_disable_nfc_rule() Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 11/17] igc: Change adapter->nfc_rule_lock to mutex Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 12/17] igc: Remove igc_nfc_rule_exit() Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 13/17] igc: Remove unused descriptor's flags Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 14/17] igb: Report speed and duplex as unknown when device is runtime suspended Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 15/17] e1000e: Warn if disabling ULP failed Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 17/17] e1000e: disable s0ix entry and exit flows for ME systems Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 23:48 ` [net-next 00/17][pull request] 1GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2020-05-22 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200523025109.3313635-17-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=aaron.f.brown@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).