From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 3/3] Rename nla_strlcpy to nla_strscpy.
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:05:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201022160551.33d85912@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202010221302.5BA047AC9@keescook>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:04:32 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > From: Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com>
> > > >
> > > > Calls to nla_strlcpy are now replaced by calls to nla_strscpy which is the
> > > > new name of this function.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com>
> > >
> > > The Subject could also be: "treewide: Rename nla_strlcpy to nla_strscpy"
> > >
> > > But otherwise, yup, easy mechanical change.
> >
> > Should I submit a v4 for this change?
>
> I'll say yes. :) Drop the RFC, bump to v4, and send it to netdev (along
> with all the other CCs you have here already), and add the Reviewed-bys
> from v3.
Maybe wait until next week, IIRC this doesn't fix any bugs, so it's
-next material. We don't apply anything to net-next during the merge
window.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-22 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-20 16:47 [RFC][PATCH v3 0/3] Fix inefficiences and rename nla_strlcpy laniel_francis
2020-10-20 16:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] Fix unefficient call to memset before memcpu in nla_strlcpy laniel_francis
2020-10-21 23:46 ` Kees Cook
2020-10-20 16:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 2/3] Modify return value of nla_strlcpy to match that of strscpy laniel_francis
2020-10-21 23:48 ` Kees Cook
2020-10-22 9:40 ` Francis Laniel
2020-10-20 16:47 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 3/3] Rename nla_strlcpy to nla_strscpy laniel_francis
2020-10-21 23:49 ` Kees Cook
2020-10-22 9:41 ` Francis Laniel
2020-10-22 20:04 ` Kees Cook
2020-10-22 23:05 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2020-10-23 8:07 ` David Laight
2020-10-23 15:15 ` Francis Laniel
2020-10-23 15:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-23 17:41 ` Kees Cook
2020-10-23 15:16 ` Francis Laniel
2020-10-24 10:41 ` Francis Laniel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201022160551.33d85912@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).