[PATCH v1 1/1] time64.h: Consolidated PSEC_PER_SEC definition

[PATCH v1 1/1] time64.h: Consolidated PSEC_PER_SEC definition

[Andy Shevchenko]

We have currently three users of the PSEC_PER_SEC each of them defining it
individually. Instead, move it to time64.h to be available for everyone.

There is a new user coming with the same constant in use. It will also
make its life easier.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c           | 2 ++
 drivers/phy/phy-core-mipi-dphy.c                 | 2 --
 drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-dsidphy.c | 8 ++++----
 include/soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h                    | 2 --
 include/vdso/time64.h                            | 1 +
 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c
index a33ab315cc6b..87ad2137ba06 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
  * Copyright (c) 2017 Microsemi Corporation
  * Copyright 2020 NXP
  */
+#include <linux/time64.h>
+
 #include <soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h>
 #include <soc/mscc/ocelot_sys.h>
 #include <soc/mscc/ocelot.h>
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core-mipi-dphy.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core-mipi-dphy.c
index 14e0551cd319..77fe65367ce5 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-core-mipi-dphy.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core-mipi-dphy.c
@@ -12,8 +12,6 @@
 #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
 #include <linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h>
 
-#define PSEC_PER_SEC	1000000000000LL
-
 /*
  * Minimum D-PHY timings based on MIPI D-PHY specification. Derived
  * from the valid ranges specified in Section 6.9, Table 14, Page 41
diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-dsidphy.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-dsidphy.c
index 8af8c6c5cc02..347dc79a18c1 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-dsidphy.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-dsidphy.c
@@ -11,16 +11,16 @@
 #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 #include <linux/reset.h>
+#include <linux/time64.h>
+
 #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
 #include <linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h>
-#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
-#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
-
-#define PSEC_PER_SEC	1000000000000LL
 
 #define UPDATE(x, h, l)	(((x) << (l)) & GENMASK((h), (l)))
 
diff --git a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h
index 6a7388fa7cc5..ded497d72bdb 100644
--- a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h
+++ b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h
@@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ enum {
 
 #define PTP_CFG_MISC_PTP_EN		BIT(2)
 
-#define PSEC_PER_SEC			1000000000000LL
-
 #define PTP_CFG_CLK_ADJ_CFG_ENA		BIT(0)
 #define PTP_CFG_CLK_ADJ_CFG_DIR		BIT(1)
 
diff --git a/include/vdso/time64.h b/include/vdso/time64.h
index 9d43c3f5e89d..b40cfa2aa33c 100644
--- a/include/vdso/time64.h
+++ b/include/vdso/time64.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 #define NSEC_PER_MSEC	1000000L
 #define USEC_PER_SEC	1000000L
 #define NSEC_PER_SEC	1000000000L
+#define PSEC_PER_SEC	1000000000000LL
 #define FSEC_PER_SEC	1000000000000000LL
 
 #endif /* __VDSO_TIME64_H */
-- 
2.29.2

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] time64.h: Consolidated PSEC_PER_SEC definition

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Dienstag, 12. Januar 2021, 16:37:09 CET schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> We have currently three users of the PSEC_PER_SEC each of them defining it
> individually. Instead, move it to time64.h to be available for everyone.
> 
> There is a new user coming with the same constant in use. It will also
> make its life easier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c           | 2 ++
>  drivers/phy/phy-core-mipi-dphy.c                 | 2 --
>  drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-dsidphy.c | 8 ++++----

for the Rockchip-part:
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

though not sure if that reordering of other includes should be in there
or separate. Don't have a hard opinion, and will let others decide ;-)


Heiko

>  include/soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h                    | 2 --
>  include/vdso/time64.h                            | 1 +
>  5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c
> index a33ab315cc6b..87ad2137ba06 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_ptp.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
>   * Copyright (c) 2017 Microsemi Corporation
>   * Copyright 2020 NXP
>   */
> +#include <linux/time64.h>
> +
>  #include <soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h>
>  #include <soc/mscc/ocelot_sys.h>
>  #include <soc/mscc/ocelot.h>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core-mipi-dphy.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core-mipi-dphy.c
> index 14e0551cd319..77fe65367ce5 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core-mipi-dphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core-mipi-dphy.c
> @@ -12,8 +12,6 @@
>  #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>  #include <linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h>
>  
> -#define PSEC_PER_SEC	1000000000000LL
> -
>  /*
>   * Minimum D-PHY timings based on MIPI D-PHY specification. Derived
>   * from the valid ranges specified in Section 6.9, Table 14, Page 41
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-dsidphy.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-dsidphy.c
> index 8af8c6c5cc02..347dc79a18c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-dsidphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-dsidphy.c
> @@ -11,16 +11,16 @@
>  #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/reset.h>
> +#include <linux/time64.h>
> +
>  #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>  #include <linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h>
> -#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> -#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> -
> -#define PSEC_PER_SEC	1000000000000LL
>  
>  #define UPDATE(x, h, l)	(((x) << (l)) & GENMASK((h), (l)))
>  
> diff --git a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h
> index 6a7388fa7cc5..ded497d72bdb 100644
> --- a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h
> +++ b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot_ptp.h
> @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ enum {
>  
>  #define PTP_CFG_MISC_PTP_EN		BIT(2)
>  
> -#define PSEC_PER_SEC			1000000000000LL
> -
>  #define PTP_CFG_CLK_ADJ_CFG_ENA		BIT(0)
>  #define PTP_CFG_CLK_ADJ_CFG_DIR		BIT(1)
>  
> diff --git a/include/vdso/time64.h b/include/vdso/time64.h
> index 9d43c3f5e89d..b40cfa2aa33c 100644
> --- a/include/vdso/time64.h
> +++ b/include/vdso/time64.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #define NSEC_PER_MSEC	1000000L
>  #define USEC_PER_SEC	1000000L
>  #define NSEC_PER_SEC	1000000000L
> +#define PSEC_PER_SEC	1000000000000LL
>  #define FSEC_PER_SEC	1000000000000000LL
>  
>  #endif /* __VDSO_TIME64_H */
> 

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] time64.h: Consolidated PSEC_PER_SEC definition

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:37:09 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> We have currently three users of the PSEC_PER_SEC each of them defining it
> individually. Instead, move it to time64.h to be available for everyone.
> 
> There is a new user coming with the same constant in use. It will also
> make its life easier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Which tree will you send the new user to? I'm not sure who you're
expecting to take this patch :S

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] time64.h: Consolidated PSEC_PER_SEC definition

[Vinod Koul]

On 14-01-21, 09:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thursday, January 14, 2021, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:37:09 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > We have currently three users of the PSEC_PER_SEC each of them defining
> > it
> > > individually. Instead, move it to time64.h to be available for everyone.
> > >
> > > There is a new user coming with the same constant in use. It will also
> > > make its life easier.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Which tree will you send the new user to? I'm not sure who you're
> > expecting to take this patch :S
> 
> 
> I think PHY tree is the best candidate with providing an immutable branch
> for others.

Sure I can do that, I would wait for other folks to ack this

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod