From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.ibm.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Dany Madden <drt@linux.ibm.com>,
Lijun Pan <ljp@linux.ibm.com>,
Rick Lindsley <ricklind@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] ibmvnic: serialize access to work queue
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:40:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210113004049.GA216185@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47e7f34d0c8a14eefba6aac00b08fc39cab61679.camel@kernel.org>
Saeed Mahameed [saeed@kernel.org] wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 10:14 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
<snip>
> > @@ -5467,7 +5472,15 @@ static int ibmvnic_remove(struct vio_dev *dev)
> > return -EBUSY;
> > }
> >
> > + /* If ibmvnic_reset() is scheduling a reset, wait for it to
> > + * finish. Then prevent it from scheduling any more resets
> > + * and have the reset functions ignore any resets that have
> > + * already been scheduled.
> > + */
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->remove_lock, flags);
> > adapter->state = VNIC_REMOVING;
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->remove_lock, flags);
> > +
>
> Why irqsave/restore variants ? are you expecting this spinlock to be
> held in interruptcontext ?
>
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
Good question.
One of the callers of ibmvnic_reset() is the ->ndo_tx_timeout()
method which gets called from the watchdog timer.
Thanks for the review.
Sukadev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-12 18:14 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] ibmvnic: Use more consistent locking Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] ibmvnic: restore state in change-param reset Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-12 18:35 ` Dany Madden
2021-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] ibmvnic: update reset function prototypes Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] ibmvnic: avoid allocating rwi entries Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-12 19:48 ` Saeed Mahameed
2021-01-13 1:15 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] ibmvnic: switch order of checks in ibmvnic_reset Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] ibmvnic: serialize access to work queue Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-12 19:56 ` Saeed Mahameed
2021-01-13 0:40 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2021-01-13 1:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] ibmvnic: check adapter->state under state_lock Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-12 18:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/7] ibmvnic: add comments about state_lock Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-12 20:00 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] ibmvnic: Use more consistent locking Saeed Mahameed
2021-01-13 2:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-13 4:42 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-13 18:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-13 19:55 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-01-14 2:35 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210113004049.GA216185@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=drt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ljp@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricklind@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).