netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Thomas Davis <tadavis@lbl.gov>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bonding: add a vlan+mac tx hashing option
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:23:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114132314.2c484e9f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114211141.GH1171031@redhat.com>

On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:11:41 -0500 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> In truth, this code started out as a copy of bond_eth_hash(), which also
> only uses the last byte, though of both source and destination macs. In
> the typical use case for the requesting user, the bond is formed from two
> onboard NICs, which typically have adjacent mac addresses, i.e.,
> AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:01 and AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:02, so only the last byte is really
> relevant to hash differently, but in thinking about it, a replacement NIC
> because an onboard one died could have the same last byte, and maybe we
> ought to just go full source mac right off the go here.
> 
> Something like this instead maybe:
> 
> static u32 bond_vlan_srcmac_hash(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
>         struct ethhdr *mac_hdr = (struct ethhdr *)skb_mac_header(skb);
>         u32 srcmac = 0;
>         u16 vlan;
>         int i;
> 
>         for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
>                 srcmac = (srcmac << 8) | mac_hdr->h_source[i];
> 
>         if (!skb_vlan_tag_present(skb))
>                 return srcmac;
> 
>         vlan = skb_vlan_tag_get(skb);
> 
>         return vlan ^ srcmac;
> }
> 
> Then the documentation is spot-on, and we're future-proof, though
> marginally less performant in calculating the hash, which may have been a
> consideration when the original function was written, but is probably
> basically irrelevant w/modern systems...

No preference, especially if bond_eth_hash() already uses the last byte.
Just make sure the choice is explained in the commit message.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-14 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-18 19:30 [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option Jarod Wilson
2020-12-19  0:18 ` Jay Vosburgh
2021-01-08  0:03   ` Jarod Wilson
2021-01-12 21:12     ` Jarod Wilson
2021-01-12 21:39       ` Jay Vosburgh
2021-01-12 22:32         ` Jarod Wilson
2020-12-28 10:11 ` Jiri Pirko
2021-01-07 23:58   ` Jarod Wilson
2021-01-08 13:12     ` Jiri Pirko
2021-01-08 15:21       ` Jarod Wilson
2021-01-15  2:02       ` question about bonding mode 4 moyufeng
2021-01-23  6:10         ` moyufeng
2021-01-29 19:11           ` Jay Vosburgh
2021-01-30  9:41             ` moyufeng
2021-01-13 22:35 ` [PATCH net-next v2] bonding: add a vlan+mac tx hashing option Jarod Wilson
2021-01-13 23:41   ` [PATCH iproute2] bond: support xmit_hash_policy=vlan+mac Jarod Wilson
2021-01-15 15:12     ` Jarod Wilson
2021-01-15 19:21     ` [PATCH iproute2 v2] bond: support xmit_hash_policy=vlan+srcmac Jarod Wilson
2021-01-23 18:35       ` David Ahern
2021-01-14  1:58   ` [PATCH net-next v2] bonding: add a vlan+mac tx hashing option Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-14 21:11     ` Jarod Wilson
2021-01-14 21:23       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2021-01-14 21:42         ` Jarod Wilson
2021-01-14 21:54       ` Jay Vosburgh
2021-01-15 15:08         ` Jarod Wilson
2021-01-15 19:21   ` [PATCH net-next v3] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac " Jarod Wilson
2021-01-18 23:10     ` David Ahern
2021-01-19  1:04       ` Jarod Wilson
2021-01-19  1:09     ` [PATCH net-next v4] " Jarod Wilson
2021-01-20  6:10       ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210114132314.2c484e9f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tadavis@lbl.gov \
    --cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).