[PATCH] wl12xx: scan: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[PATCH] wl12xx: scan: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync

[cgel.zte]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
actual functional changes.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/scan.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/scan.c
index 29fa51c37e88..b414305acc32 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/scan.c
@@ -53,11 +53,9 @@ void wl1271_scan_complete_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	wl->scan.req = NULL;
 	wl->scan_wlvif = NULL;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	if (test_bit(WLVIF_FLAG_STA_ASSOCIATED, &wlvif->flags)) {
 		/* restore hardware connection monitoring template */
-- 
2.25.1

Re: wl12xx: scan: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

[Kalle Valo]

cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:

> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
> pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
> actual functional changes.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Patch applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.

c94e36908467 wl12xx: scan: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220420090247.2588680-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches