netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
	Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 net-next 08/17] net/sched: mqprio: allow reverse TC:TXQ mappings
Date: Thu,  2 Feb 2023 02:36:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230202003621.2679603-9-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230202003621.2679603-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

By imposing that the last TXQ of TC i is smaller than the first TXQ of
any TC j (j := i+1 .. n), mqprio imposes a strict ordering condition for
the TXQ indices (they must increase as TCs increase).

Claudiu points out that the complexity of the TXQ count validation is
too high for this logic, i.e. instead of iterating over j, it is
sufficient that the TXQ indices of TC i and i + 1 are ordered, and that
will eventually ensure global ordering.

This is true, however it doesn't appear to me that is what the code
really intended to do. Instead, based on the comments, it just wanted to
check for overlaps (and this isn't how one does that).

So the following mqprio configuration, which I had recommended to
Vinicius more than once for igb/igc (to account for the fact that on
this hardware, lower numbered TXQs have higher dequeue priority than
higher ones):

num_tc 4 map 0 1 2 3 queues 1@3 1@2 1@1 1@0

is in fact denied today by mqprio.

The full story is that in fact, it's only denied with "hw 0"; if
hardware offloading is requested, mqprio defers TXQ range overlap
validation to the device driver (a strange decision in itself).

This is most certainly a bug, but it's not one that has any merit for
being fixed on "stable" as far as I can tell. This is because mqprio
always rejected a configuration which was in fact valid, and this has
shaped the way in which mqprio configuration scripts got built for
various hardware (see igb/igc in the link below). Therefore, one could
consider it to be merely an improvement for mqprio to allow reverse
TC:TXQ mappings.

Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230130173145.475943-9-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/#25188310
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230128010719.2182346-6-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/#25186442
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
v4->v5: patch is new

 net/sched/sch_mqprio.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/sch_mqprio.c b/net/sched/sch_mqprio.c
index 3579a64da06e..25ab215641a2 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_mqprio.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_mqprio.c
@@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ struct mqprio_sched {
 	u64 max_rate[TC_QOPT_MAX_QUEUE];
 };
 
+/* Returns true if the intervals [a, b) and [c, d) overlap. */
+static bool intervals_overlap(int a, int b, int c, int d)
+{
+	int left = max(a, c), right = min(b, d);
+
+	return left < right;
+}
+
 static int mqprio_enable_offload(struct Qdisc *sch,
 				 const struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt)
 {
@@ -144,7 +152,10 @@ static int mqprio_parse_opt(struct net_device *dev, struct tc_mqprio_qopt *qopt)
 
 		/* Verify that the offset and counts do not overlap */
 		for (j = i + 1; j < qopt->num_tc; j++) {
-			if (last > qopt->offset[j])
+			if (intervals_overlap(qopt->offset[i], last,
+					      qopt->offset[j],
+					      qopt->offset[j] +
+					      qopt->count[j]))
 				return -EINVAL;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-02  0:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-02  0:36 [PATCH v5 net-next 00/17] ENETC mqprio/taprio cleanup Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 01/17] net: enetc: simplify enetc_num_stack_tx_queues() Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 02/17] net: enetc: allow the enetc_reconfigure() callback to fail Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 03/17] net: enetc: recalculate num_real_tx_queues when XDP program attaches Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 04/17] net: enetc: ensure we always have a minimum number of TXQs for stack Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 05/17] net/sched: mqprio: refactor nlattr parsing to a separate function Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 06/17] net/sched: mqprio: refactor offloading and unoffloading to dedicated functions Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 07/17] net/sched: move struct tc_mqprio_qopt_offload from pkt_cls.h to pkt_sched.h Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2023-02-03 16:18   ` [PATCH v5 net-next 08/17] net/sched: mqprio: allow reverse TC:TXQ mappings Simon Horman
2023-02-05 11:55   ` Gerhard Engleder
2023-02-05 12:22     ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 09/17] net/sched: mqprio: allow offloading drivers to request queue count validation Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 10/17] net/sched: mqprio: add extack messages for " Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 11/17] net/sched: taprio: centralize mqprio qopt validation Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-03 16:32   ` Simon Horman
2023-02-05 12:10   ` Gerhard Engleder
2023-02-05 12:23     ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 12/17] net/sched: refactor mqprio qopt reconstruction to a library function Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-03 16:33   ` Simon Horman
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 13/17] net/sched: taprio: pass mqprio queue configuration to ndo_setup_tc() Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 14/17] net/sched: taprio: only calculate gate mask per TXQ for igc, stmmac and tsnep Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  8:04   ` Roger Quadros
2023-02-02 12:31     ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02 20:05       ` Roger Quadros
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 15/17] net: enetc: request mqprio to validate the queue counts Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 16/17] net: enetc: act upon the requested mqprio queue configuration Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02  0:36 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 17/17] net: enetc: act upon mqprio queue config in taprio offload Vladimir Oltean
2023-02-02 20:54 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 00/17] ENETC mqprio/taprio cleanup Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230202003621.2679603-9-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    --cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).