netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <paul@paulmenage.org>,
	<lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	<ebiederm@xmission.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<gthelen@google.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:11:21 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E764259.5070209@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110918190509.GC28057@shutemov.name>

On 09/18/2011 04:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:39:12AM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>> No kernel memory accounting for root cgroup, right?
>> Not sure. Maybe kernel memory accounting is useful even for root cgroup.
>> Same as normal memory accounting... what we want to avoid is kernel
>> memory limits. OTOH, if we are not limiting it anyway, accounting it is
>> just useless overhead... Even the statistics can then be gathered
>> through all
>> the proc files that show slab usage, I guess?
>
> It's better to leave root cgroup without accounting. At least for now.
> We can add it later if needed.

Fair.

>>>
>>>> @@ -3979,6 +3999,10 @@ static u64 mem_cgroup_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft)
>>>>    		else
>>>>    			val = res_counter_read_u64(&mem->memsw, name);
>>>>    		break;
>>>> +	case _KMEM:
>>>> +		val = res_counter_read_u64(&mem->kmem, name);
>>>> +		break;
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Always zero in root cgroup?
>>
>> Yes, if we're not accounting, it should be zero. WARN_ON, maybe?
>
> -ENOSYS?
>
I'd personally prefer WARN_ON. It is good symmetry from userspace PoV to 
always be able to get a value out of it. Also, it something goes wrong 
and it is not zero for some reason, this will help us find it.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-18 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-15  1:46 [PATCH v2 0/7] per-cgroup tcp buffer pressure settings Glauber Costa
2011-09-15  1:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller Glauber Costa
2011-09-17 17:45   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-18  3:39     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-18 19:05       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-18 19:11         ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2011-09-18 20:39           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-18 20:40             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-18 20:43               ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-15  1:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] socket: initial cgroup code Glauber Costa
2011-09-17 17:52   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-18  3:32     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-18 18:58       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-15  1:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling Glauber Costa
2011-09-15  1:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] per-cgroup tcp buffers control Glauber Costa
2011-09-17 18:11   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-17 18:33     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-09-18  3:32       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-18 18:58       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-18 19:42         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-28 11:58   ` Andrew Wagin
2011-09-28 12:11     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-15  1:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem Glauber Costa
2011-09-15  1:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit Glauber Costa
2011-09-17 12:12   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-15  1:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] Display current tcp memory allocation in kmem cgroup Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E764259.5070209@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).