netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@canonical.com>,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sasha.neftin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: bump up timeout to wait when ME un-configure ULP mode
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:31:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f9f1ad0-e66a-d3c8-b152-209e9595e5d7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200323191639.48826-1-aaron.ma@canonical.com>

Hi,

On 3/23/20 8:16 PM, Aaron Ma wrote:
> ME takes 2+ seconds to un-configure ULP mode done after resume
> from s2idle on some ThinkPad laptops.
> Without enough wait, reset and re-init will fail with error.
> 
> Fixes: f15bb6dde738cc8fa0 ("e1000e: Add support for S0ix")
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865570
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@canonical.com>

I have been testing this bug because this is being reported against
Fedora 32 too:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816621

I can confirm that this patch fixes the problem of both
a X1 7th gen as a X1 8th gen no longer suspending after
a suspend resume cycle.

Not only does it fix that, before this patch the kernel
would regularly log the following error on these laptops
independent of suspend/resume activity:

e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 enp0s31f6: Hardware Error

These messages are now also gone. So it seems that the timeout
is really just too short.

I can agree that it would be good to better understand this;
and/or to get the ME firmware fixed to not take so long.

But in my experience when dealing with e.g. embedded-controller
in various laptops sometimes the firmware of these devives
simply just takes a long time for certain things.

This fix fixes a real problem, on a popular model laptop
and since it just extends a timeout it is a pretty harmless
(no chance of regressions) fix. As such since there seems
to be no other solution in sight, can we please move forward
with this fix for now ?

Regards,

Hans





> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> index b4135c50e905..147b15a2f8b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> @@ -1240,9 +1240,9 @@ static s32 e1000_disable_ulp_lpt_lp(struct e1000_hw *hw, bool force)
>   			ew32(H2ME, mac_reg);
>   		}
>   
> -		/* Poll up to 300msec for ME to clear ULP_CFG_DONE. */
> +		/* Poll up to 2.5sec for ME to clear ULP_CFG_DONE. */
>   		while (er32(FWSM) & E1000_FWSM_ULP_CFG_DONE) {
> -			if (i++ == 30) {
> +			if (i++ == 250) {
>   				ret_val = -E1000_ERR_PHY;
>   				goto out;
>   			}
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-02 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-23 19:16 [PATCH] e1000e: bump up timeout to wait when ME un-configure ULP mode Aaron Ma
2020-03-25  4:17 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-03-25  6:36   ` Neftin, Sasha
2020-03-25  6:39     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-03-25  6:42       ` Tsai, Rex
2020-03-25  6:49         ` Aaron Ma
2020-03-25  6:43     ` Aaron Ma
2020-03-25 13:58       ` Neftin, Sasha
2020-03-25 14:07         ` Aaron Ma
2020-03-25 15:49         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2020-03-26 11:29           ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-03-26 11:41             ` Paul Menzel
2020-03-28 10:55             ` David Laight
2020-04-02 12:31 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2020-04-03  3:15   ` Aaron Ma
2020-04-03  7:37     ` Paul Menzel
2020-04-05  6:46     ` Neftin, Sasha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f9f1ad0-e66a-d3c8-b152-209e9595e5d7@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=aaron.ma@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sasha.neftin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).