From: "fugang.duan@freescale.com" <fugang.duan@freescale.com>
To: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@digi.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Fabio.Estevam@freescale.com" <Fabio.Estevam@freescale.com>,
"shawn.guo@linaro.org" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"Frank.Li@freescale.com" <Frank.Li@freescale.com>,
"bhutchings@solarflare.com" <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: RE: FEC performance degradation with certain packet sizes
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 01:08:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fcefc0e43a5448292b7b40f32c950de@BLUPR03MB373.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B45BD2.2060306@digi.com>
From: Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@digi.com>
Data: Friday, December 20, 2013 11:02 PM
>To: Duan Fugang-B38611; Marek Vasut; netdev@vger.kernel.org
>Cc: Estevam Fabio-R49496; shawn.guo@linaro.org; l.stach@pengutronix.de; Li
>Frank-B20596; bhutchings@solarflare.com; davem@davemloft.net
>Subject: Re: FEC performance degradation with certain packet sizes
>
>Dear Andy,
>
>On 12/20/2013 04:35 AM, fugang.duan@freescale.com wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> I can reproduce the issue on imx6q/dl platform with freescale internal kernel
>tree.
>>
>> This issue must be related to cpufreq, when set scaling_governor to
>performance:
>> echo performance >
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
>>
>> And then do NPtcp test, the result as below:
>>
>> 24: 99 bytes 5 times --> 9.89 Mbps in 76.40 usec
>> 25: 125 bytes 5 times --> 12.10 Mbps in 78.80 usec
>> 26: 128 bytes 5 times --> 12.27 Mbps in 79.60 usec
>> 27: 131 bytes 5 times --> 12.80 Mbps in 78.10 usec
>> 28: 189 bytes 5 times --> 18.00 Mbps in 80.10 usec
>> 29: 192 bytes 5 times --> 18.31 Mbps in 80.00 usec
>> 30: 195 bytes 5 times --> 18.41 Mbps in 80.80 usec
>> 31: 253 bytes 5 times --> 23.34 Mbps in 82.70 usec
>> 32: 256 bytes 5 times --> 23.91 Mbps in 81.70 usec
>> 33: 259 bytes 5 times --> 24.19 Mbps in 81.70 usec
>> 34: 381 bytes 5 times --> 33.18 Mbps in 87.60 usec
>> 35: 384 bytes 5 times --> 33.87 Mbps in 86.50 usec
>> 36: 387 bytes 5 times --> 34.41 Mbps in 85.80 usec
>> 37: 509 bytes 5 times --> 42.72 Mbps in 90.90 usec
>> 38: 512 bytes 5 times --> 42.60 Mbps in 91.70 usec
>> 39: 515 bytes 5 times --> 42.80 Mbps in 91.80 usec
>> 40: 765 bytes 5 times --> 56.45 Mbps in 103.40 usec
>> 41: 768 bytes 5 times --> 57.11 Mbps in 102.60 usec
>> 42: 771 bytes 5 times --> 57.22 Mbps in 102.80 usec
>> 43: 1021 bytes 5 times --> 70.69 Mbps in 110.20 usec
>> 44: 1024 bytes 5 times --> 70.70 Mbps in 110.50 usec
>> 45: 1027 bytes 5 times --> 69.59 Mbps in 112.60 usec
>> 46: 1533 bytes 5 times --> 73.56 Mbps in 159.00 usec
>> 47: 1536 bytes 5 times --> 72.92 Mbps in 160.70 usec
>> 48: 1539 bytes 5 times --> 73.80 Mbps in 159.10 usec
>> 49: 2045 bytes 5 times --> 93.59 Mbps in 166.70 usec
>> 50: 2048 bytes 5 times --> 94.07 Mbps in 166.10 usec
>> 51: 2051 bytes 5 times --> 92.92 Mbps in 168.40 usec
>> 52: 3069 bytes 5 times --> 123.43 Mbps in 189.70 usec
>> 53: 3072 bytes 5 times --> 123.68 Mbps in 189.50 usec
>
>You are right. Unfortunately, this does not work on i.MX28 (at least for me).
>Couldn't it be that the cpufreq is masking the problem on the i.MX6?
>
>Best regards,
>--
>Hector Palacios
>
I will test it on imx28 platform. And then analyze the result.
Thanks,
Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-23 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-22 12:40 FEC performance degradation on iMX28 with forced link media Hector Palacios
2013-11-24 4:40 ` Marek Vasut
2013-11-25 8:56 ` Hector Palacios
2013-12-18 16:43 ` FEC performance degradation with certain packet sizes Hector Palacios
2013-12-18 17:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-19 2:44 ` fugang.duan
2013-12-19 23:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-12-20 0:18 ` Shawn Guo
2013-12-20 3:35 ` fugang.duan
2013-12-20 15:01 ` Hector Palacios
2013-12-23 1:08 ` fugang.duan [this message]
2013-12-23 2:52 ` fugang.duan
2014-01-21 17:49 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4fcefc0e43a5448292b7b40f32c950de@BLUPR03MB373.namprd03.prod.outlook.com \
--to=fugang.duan@freescale.com \
--cc=Fabio.Estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@freescale.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hector.palacios@digi.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).