netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@fb.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 10:13:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60c011eb99c1859d4ee7191d4cbc20d11548f327.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221129213724.10119-4-vfedorenko@novek.ru>

Hello,

I have a just a few minor notes WRT the documentation - which was a
very useful entry point for me to help understanding the subsystem.

On Wed, 2022-11-30 at 00:37 +0300, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@fb.com>
> 
> Add documentation explaining common netlink interface to configure DPLL
> devices and monitoring events. Common way to implement DPLL device in
> a driver is also covered.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@fb.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/networking/dpll.rst  | 271 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  Documentation/networking/index.rst |   1 +
>  2 files changed, 272 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/dpll.rst
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/dpll.rst b/Documentation/networking/dpll.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..58401e2b70a7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/dpll.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +===============================
> +The Linux kernel DPLL subsystem
> +===============================
> +
> +
> +The main purpose of DPLL subsystem is to provide general interface
> +to configure devices that use any kind of Digital PLL and could use
> +different sources of signal to synchronize to as well as different
> +types of outputs.
> +The main interface is NETLINK_GENERIC based protocol with an event
> +monitoring multicast group defined.
> +
> +
> +Pin object
> +==========
> +A pin is amorphic object which represents either input and output, it
> +could be internal component of the device, as well as externaly
> +connected.
> +The number of pins per dpll vary, but usually multiple pins shall be
> +provided for a single dpll device.
> +Direction of a pin and it's capabilities are provided to the user in
> +response for netlink dump request messages.
> +Pin can be shared by multiple dpll devices. Where configuration on one
> +pin can alter multiple dplls (i.e. DPLL_PIN_SGINAL_TYPE, DPLL_PIN_TYPE,

Likely typo above: DPLL_PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE

> +DPLL_PIN_STATE), or just one pin-dpll pair (i.e. DPLL_PIN_PRIO).
> +Pin can be also a MUX type, where one or more pins are attached to
> +a parent pin. The parent pin is the one directly connected to the dpll,
> +which may be used by dplls in DPLL_MODE_AUTOMATIC selection mode, where
> +only pins directly connected to the dpll are capable of automatic
> +source pin selection. In such case, pins are dumped with
> +DPLLA_PIN_PARENT_IDX, and are able to be selected by the userspace with
> +netlink request.
> +
> +Configuration commands group
> +============================
> +
> +Configuration commands are used to get or dump information about
> +registered DPLL devices (and pins), as well as set configuration of
> +device or pins. As DPLL device could not be abstract and reflects real
> +hardware, there is no way to add new DPLL device via netlink from user
> +space and each device should be registered by it's driver.

Side note: in the long run we could end-up with a virtual/dummy dpll
driver for self-tests and/or reference's implementation sake.

> +
> +List of command with possible attributes
> +========================================
> +
> +All constants identifying command types use ``DPLL_CMD_`` prefix and
> +suffix according to command purpose. All attributes use ``DPLLA_``
> +prefix and suffix according to attribute purpose:
> +
> +  ============================  =======================================
> +  ``DEVICE_GET``                userspace to get device info
> +    ``ID``                      attr internal dpll device index
> +    ``NAME``                    attr dpll device name
> +    ``MODE``                    attr selection mode
> +    ``MODE_SUPPORTED``          attr available selection modes
> +    ``SOURCE_PIN_IDX``          attr index of currently selected source
> +    ``LOCK_STATUS``             attr internal frequency-lock status
> +    ``TEMP``                    attr device temperature information
> +    ``NETIFINDEX``              attr dpll owner Linux netdevice index

should we include also the cookie (or wuhatever will be used for
persistent device identification) into the readable attributes list? 

> +  ``DEVICE_SET``                userspace to set dpll device
> +                                configuration
> +    ``ID``                      attr internal dpll device index
> +    ``MODE``                    attr selection mode to configure
> +    ``PIN_IDX``                 attr index of source pin to select as
> +                                active source

It looks like the descrition for the above attribute ('PIN_IDX') and
'SOURCE_PIN_IDX' has been swapped.

> +  ``PIN_SET``                   userspace to set pins configuration
> +    ``ID``                      attr internal dpll device index
> +    ``PIN_IDX``                 attr index of a pin to configure
> +    ``PIN_TYPE``                attr type configuration value for
> +                                selected pin
> +    ``PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE``         attr signal type configuration value
> +                                for selected pin
> +    ``PIN_CUSTOM_FREQ``         attr signal custom frequency to be set
> +    ``PIN_STATE``               attr pin state to be set
> +    ``PIN_PRIO``                attr pin priority to be set
> +
> +Netlink dump requests
> +=====================
> +The ``DEVICE_GET`` command is capable of dump type netlink requests.
> +In such case the userspace shall provide ``DUMP_FILTER`` attribute
> +value to filter the response as required.
> +If filter is not provided only name and id of available dpll(s) is
> +provided. If the request also contains ``ID`` attribute, only selected
> +dpll device shall be dumped.

Should we explicitly document even the required permissions?

> +
> +Possible response message attributes for netlink requests depending on
> +the value of ``DPLLA_DUMP_FILTER`` attribute:
> +
> +  =============================== ====================================
> +  ``DPLL_DUMP_FILTER_PINS``       value of ``DUMP_FILTER`` attribute
> +    ``PIN``                       attr nested type contain single pin
> +                                  attributes
> +    ``PIN_IDX``                   attr index of dumped pin
> +    ``PIN_DESCRIPTION``           description of a pin provided by
> +                                  driver
> +    ``PIN_TYPE``                  attr value of pin type
> +    ``PIN_TYPE_SUPPORTED``        attr value of supported pin type
> +    ``PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE``           attr value of pin signal type
> +    ``PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_SUPPORTED`` attr value of supported pin signal
> +                                  type
> +    ``PIN_CUSTOM_FREQ``           attr value of pin custom frequency
> +    ``PIN_STATE``                 attr value of pin state
> +    ``PIN_STATE_SUPPORTED``       attr value of supported pin state
> +    ``PIN_PRIO``                  attr value of pin prio
> +    ``PIN_PARENT_IDX``            attr value of pin patent index
> +    ``PIN_NETIFINDEX``            attr value of netdevice assocaiated
> +                                  with the pin
> +  ``DPLL_DUMP_FILTER_STATUS``     value of ``DUMP_FILTER`` attribute
> +    ``ID``                        attr internal dpll device index
> +    ``NAME``                      attr dpll device name
> +    ``MODE``                      attr selection mode
> +    ``MODE_SUPPORTED``            attr available selection modes
> +    ``SOURCE_PIN_IDX``            attr index of currently selected
> +                                  source
> +    ``LOCK_STATUS``               attr internal frequency-lock status
> +    ``TEMP``                      attr device temperature information
> +    ``NETIFINDEX``                attr dpll owner Linux netdevice index
> +
> +
> +The pre-defined enums
> +=====================
> +
> +All the enums use the ``DPLL_`` prefix.
> +
> +Values for ``PIN_TYPE`` and ``PIN_TYPE_SUPPORTED`` attributes:
> +
> +  ============================ ========================================
> +  ``PIN_TYPE_MUX``             MUX type pin, connected pins shall
> +                               have their own types
> +  ``PIN_TYPE_EXT``             External pin
> +  ``PIN_TYPE_SYNCE_ETH_PORT``  SyncE on Ethernet port
> +  ``PIN_TYPE_INT_OSCILLATOR``  Internal Oscillator (i.e. Holdover
> +                               with Atomic Clock as a Source)
> +  ``PIN_TYPE_GNSS``            GNSS 1PPS source
> +
> +Values for ``PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE`` and ``PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_SUPPORTED``
> +attributes:
> +
> +  ===============================  ===================================
> +  ``PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_1_PPS``        1 Hz frequency
> +  ``PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_10_MHZ``       10 MHz frequency
> +  ``PIN_SIGNAL_TYPE_CUSTOM_FREQ``  Frequency value provided in attr
> +                                   ``PIN_CUSTOM_FREQ``
> +
> +Values for ``LOCK_STATUS`` attribute:
> +
> +  ============================= ======================================
> +  ``LOCK_STATUS_UNLOCKED``      DPLL is in freerun, not locked to any
> +                                source pin
> +  ``LOCK_STATUS_CALIBRATING``   DPLL device calibrates to lock to the
> +                                source pin signal
> +  ``LOCK_STATUS_LOCKED``        DPLL device is locked to the source
> +                                pin frequency
> +  ``LOCK_STATUS_HOLDOVER``      DPLL device lost a lock, using its
> +                                frequency holdover capabilities
> +
> +Values for ``PIN_STATE`` and ``PIN_STATE_SUPPORTED`` attributes:
> +
> +============================= ============================
> +  ``PIN_STATE_CONNECTED``     Pin connected to a dpll
> +  ``PIN_STATE_DISCONNECTED``  Pin disconnected from dpll
> +  ``PIN_STATE_SOURCE``        Source pin
> +  ``PIN_STATE_OUTPUT``        Output pin
> +
> +Possible DPLL source selection mode values:
> +
> +  =================== ================================================
> +  ``MODE_FORCED``     source pin is force-selected by
> +                      ``DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_SET`` with given value of
> +                      ``DPLLA_SOURCE_PIN_IDX`` attribute
> +  ``MODE_AUTOMATIC``  source pin ise auto selected according to

typo above 'ise' -> 'is'


Cheers,

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-19  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-29 21:37 [RFC PATCH v4 0/4] Create common DPLL/clock configuration API Vadim Fedorenko
2022-11-29 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/4] dpll: add dpll_attr/dpll_pin_attr helper classes Vadim Fedorenko
2022-11-29 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions Vadim Fedorenko
2022-11-30 15:21   ` Jiri Pirko
2022-11-30 16:23     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-23 16:45     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-01-02 12:28       ` Jiri Pirko
2022-11-30 16:37   ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-02 11:27     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-02 12:39       ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-02 14:54         ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-02 16:15           ` Jiri Pirko
     [not found]             ` <20221202212206.3619bd5f@kernel.org>
2022-12-05 10:32               ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-06  0:19                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-06  8:50                   ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-06 17:27                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-07 13:10                       ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-07 16:59                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-08  8:14                           ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-08 16:19                             ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-08 16:33                               ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-08 17:05                                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-09  9:29                                   ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-09 16:19                                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-12 13:36                                       ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-13 18:08                                         ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-14  7:32                                           ` Jiri Pirko
2022-11-29 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface Vadim Fedorenko
2022-12-19  9:13   ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2023-01-12 13:45     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-11-29 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/4] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops Vadim Fedorenko
2022-11-30 12:41   ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-02 11:27     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-02 12:48       ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-02 14:39         ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-02 16:20           ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-08  0:35             ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-08  8:19               ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-07  2:33           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-07 13:19             ` Jiri Pirko
     [not found]               ` <20221207090524.3f562eeb@kernel.org>
2022-12-08 11:22                 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-09  0:36                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-09  9:32                     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-11-30 12:32 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/4] Create common DPLL/clock configuration API Jiri Pirko
2022-12-02 11:27   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-02 16:12     ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-07  2:47       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-07 14:09         ` netdev.dump
2022-12-07 23:21           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-08 11:28             ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-09  0:39               ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-09  0:56                 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-08 18:08             ` Maciek Machnikowski
2022-12-09 11:07               ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-09 14:09                 ` Maciek Machnikowski
2022-12-09 16:31                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-09 17:11                     ` Maciek Machnikowski
2022-12-12 13:58                     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 14:43                       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-01-09 16:30                         ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 10:54                           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-01-10 14:28                             ` Jiri Pirko
     [not found]                             ` <645a5bfd-0092-2f39-0ff2-3ffb27ccf8fe@machnikowski.net>
2023-01-11 14:17                               ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-01-11 14:40                                 ` Maciek Machnikowski
2023-01-11 15:30                                   ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-01-11 15:54                                     ` Maciek Machnikowski
2023-01-11 16:27                                       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-01-10 20:05                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11  8:19                           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 14:16                             ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-01-11 15:04                               ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 15:30                                 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-01-11 16:14                                   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 12:15                                     ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-01-12 14:43                                       ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-09  0:46             ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-07 14:51         ` Jiri Pirko
     [not found]           ` <20221207091946.3115742f@kernel.org>
2022-12-08 12:02             ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-09  0:54               ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-08 18:23             ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-08  0:27       ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-08 11:58         ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-08 23:05           ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2022-12-09 10:01             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 12:23 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
2023-01-12 14:50   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 19:09   ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60c011eb99c1859d4ee7191d4cbc20d11548f327.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vadfed@fb.com \
    --cc=vfedorenko@novek.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).