netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
	"john.fastabend@gmail.com" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"kpsingh@chromium.org" <kpsingh@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add bpf_iter test with bpf_get_task_stack_trace()
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 22:07:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78BB08A3-D049-4795-8702-470C5841062C@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <445e1e04-882f-7ff7-9bd4-ebcf679cebbb@fb.com>



> On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:57 AM, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/23/20 12:08 AM, Song Liu wrote:
>> The new test is similar to other bpf_iter tests.
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>> ---
>>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c       | 17 +++++++
>>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
>> index 87c29dde1cf96..baa83328f810d 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>  #include "bpf_iter_netlink.skel.h"
>>  #include "bpf_iter_bpf_map.skel.h"
>>  #include "bpf_iter_task.skel.h"
>> +#include "bpf_iter_task_stack.skel.h"
>>  #include "bpf_iter_task_file.skel.h"
>>  #include "bpf_iter_test_kern1.skel.h"
>>  #include "bpf_iter_test_kern2.skel.h"
>> @@ -106,6 +107,20 @@ static void test_task(void)
>>  	bpf_iter_task__destroy(skel);
>>  }
>>  +static void test_task_stack(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct bpf_iter_task_stack *skel;
>> +
>> +	skel = bpf_iter_task_stack__open_and_load();
>> +	if (CHECK(!skel, "bpf_iter_task_stack__open_and_load",
>> +		  "skeleton open_and_load failed\n"))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	do_dummy_read(skel->progs.dump_task_stack);
>> +
>> +	bpf_iter_task_stack__destroy(skel);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void test_task_file(void)
>>  {
>>  	struct bpf_iter_task_file *skel;
>> @@ -392,6 +407,8 @@ void test_bpf_iter(void)
>>  		test_bpf_map();
>>  	if (test__start_subtest("task"))
>>  		test_task();
>> +	if (test__start_subtest("task_stack"))
>> +		test_task_stack();
>>  	if (test__start_subtest("task_file"))
>>  		test_task_file();
>>  	if (test__start_subtest("anon"))
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000..4fc939e0fca77
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
>> +/* "undefine" structs in vmlinux.h, because we "override" them below */
>> +#define bpf_iter_meta bpf_iter_meta___not_used
>> +#define bpf_iter__task bpf_iter__task___not_used
>> +#include "vmlinux.h"
>> +#undef bpf_iter_meta
>> +#undef bpf_iter__task
>> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
>> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
>> +
>> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>> +
>> +struct bpf_iter_meta {
>> +	struct seq_file *seq;
>> +	__u64 session_id;
>> +	__u64 seq_num;
>> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
>> +
>> +struct bpf_iter__task {
>> +	struct bpf_iter_meta *meta;
>> +	struct task_struct *task;
>> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
>> +
>> +#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH   64
>> +unsigned long entries[MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH];
>> +
>> +SEC("iter/task")
>> +int dump_task_stack(struct bpf_iter__task *ctx)
>> +{
>> +	struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
>> +	struct task_struct *task = ctx->task;
>> +	unsigned int i, num_entries;
>> +
>> +	if (task == (void *)0)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	num_entries = bpf_get_task_stack_trace(task, entries, MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH);
>> +
>> +	BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "pid: %8u\n", task->pid);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH; i++) {
>> +		if (num_entries > i)
>> +			BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "[<0>] %pB\n", (void *)entries[i]);
> 
> We may have an issue on 32bit issue.
> On 32bit system, the following is called in the kernel
> +	return stack_trace_save_tsk(task, (unsigned long *)entries, size, 0);
> it will pack addresses at 4 byte increment.
> But in BPF program, the reading is in 8 byte increment.

Can we avoid potential issues by requiring size % 8 == 0? Or maybe round down
size to closest multiple of 8? 

Thanks,
Song

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-23 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-23  7:07 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: introduce bpf_get_task_stack_trace() Song Liu
2020-06-23  7:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: introduce helper bpf_get_task_stack_trace() Song Liu
2020-06-23 15:19   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-06-23 16:59     ` Song Liu
2020-06-23 17:40       ` Song Liu
2020-06-23 18:41       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-06-23 15:22   ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-06-23 17:19     ` Song Liu
2020-06-23 18:45   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-06-23 22:53     ` Song Liu
2020-06-23  7:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: allow %pB in bpf_seq_printf() Song Liu
2020-06-23 15:29   ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-06-23 17:19     ` Song Liu
2020-06-23  7:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add bpf_iter test with bpf_get_task_stack_trace() Song Liu
2020-06-23 18:57   ` Yonghong Song
2020-06-23 22:07     ` Song Liu [this message]
2020-06-23 22:27       ` Yonghong Song
2020-06-24 20:37         ` Song Liu
2020-06-25  5:29           ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78BB08A3-D049-4795-8702-470C5841062C@fb.com \
    --to=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).