From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Kernel Team" <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: introduce helper bpf_get_task_stack_trace()
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 22:53:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A91D5293-AA57-4C7B-AC71-472BD966D17B@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4Bzb3_oAyOKKEQ8+Ub5H6aaYQPh15NqyAdQQ+BXjur2Yswg@mail.gmail.com>
> On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:45 AM, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:08 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>>
>> This helper can be used with bpf_iter__task to dump all /proc/*/stack to
>> a seq_file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 +++++++++-
>> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py | 2 ++
>> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 +++++++++-
>> 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 19684813faaed..a30416b822fe3 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -3252,6 +3252,13 @@ union bpf_attr {
>> * case of **BPF_CSUM_LEVEL_QUERY**, the current skb->csum_level
>> * is returned or the error code -EACCES in case the skb is not
>> * subject to CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.
>> + *
>> + * int bpf_get_task_stack_trace(struct task_struct *task, void *entries, u32 size)
>> + * Description
>> + * Save a task stack trace into array *entries*. This is a wrapper
>> + * over stack_trace_save_tsk().
>> + * Return
>> + * Number of trace entries stored.
>> */
>> #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN) \
>> FN(unspec), \
>> @@ -3389,7 +3396,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
>> FN(ringbuf_submit), \
>> FN(ringbuf_discard), \
>> FN(ringbuf_query), \
>> - FN(csum_level),
>> + FN(csum_level), \
>> + FN(get_task_stack_trace),
>
> We have get_stackid and get_stack, I think to stay consistent it
> should be named get_task_stack
>
>>
>> /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
>> * function eBPF program intends to call
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>> index e729c9e587a07..2c13bcb5c2bce 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>> @@ -1488,6 +1488,23 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stack_proto_raw_tp = {
>> .arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
>> };
>>
>> +BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_task_stack_trace, struct task_struct *, task,
>> + void *, entries, u32, size)
>
> See get_stack definition, this one needs to support flags as well. And
> we should probably support BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID as well. And
> BPF_F_USER_STACK is also a good idea, I presume?
This will be a different direction that is similar to stackmap implementation.
Current version follows the implementation behind /proc/<pid>/stack . Let me
check which of them is better.
Thanks,
Song
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-23 7:07 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: introduce bpf_get_task_stack_trace() Song Liu
2020-06-23 7:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: introduce helper bpf_get_task_stack_trace() Song Liu
2020-06-23 15:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-06-23 16:59 ` Song Liu
2020-06-23 17:40 ` Song Liu
2020-06-23 18:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-06-23 15:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-06-23 17:19 ` Song Liu
2020-06-23 18:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-06-23 22:53 ` Song Liu [this message]
2020-06-23 7:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: allow %pB in bpf_seq_printf() Song Liu
2020-06-23 15:29 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-06-23 17:19 ` Song Liu
2020-06-23 7:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add bpf_iter test with bpf_get_task_stack_trace() Song Liu
2020-06-23 18:57 ` Yonghong Song
2020-06-23 22:07 ` Song Liu
2020-06-23 22:27 ` Yonghong Song
2020-06-24 20:37 ` Song Liu
2020-06-25 5:29 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A91D5293-AA57-4C7B-AC71-472BD966D17B@fb.com \
--to=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).