From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Lukasz Czapnik <lukasz.czapnik@intel.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Pucha Himasekhar Reddy <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ice: Fix freeing uninitialized pointers
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 03:24:56 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82b49991-eb5a-7e8c-67e0-b0fd932f40b4@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240321184828.3e22c698@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1119 bytes --]
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:27:47 -0700 Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > The gist of it is that we should instead be using inline declarations,
> > which I also agree is a reasonable style for this. It more clearly shows
> > the __free(kfree) and the allocation (kzalloc, kcalloc, etc) on the same
> > (or virtually the same) line of code.
> >
> > I'm curious if Jakub would dislike this less? Accept?
>
> At present I find this construct unreadable.
> I may get used to it, hard to say.
>
> Also I don't see the benefit of the auto-freeing construct,
> I'd venture a guess that all the bugs it may prevent would
> have been caught by smatch. But I'm an old curmudgeon stuck
> in my ways. Feel free to experiment in Intel drivers, and we'll
> see how it works out 🤷️
In my experiments with of_node_put, there seem to be many functions where
removing the frees makes the function much more readable. But
kmalloc/kfree may be used in different contexts, where the management of
the memory is a smaller percentage of the overall code. So the tradeoffs
may be different.
julia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-16 9:44 [PATCH net] ice: Fix freeing uninitialized pointers Dan Carpenter
2024-03-18 7:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-03-18 8:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-19 19:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-20 5:01 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-20 7:32 ` Julia Lawall
2024-03-20 16:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-21 3:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-21 9:59 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-03-21 10:34 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-20 12:18 ` Markus Elfring
2024-03-21 17:59 ` Markus Elfring
2024-03-21 18:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-21 18:14 ` Markus Elfring
2024-03-21 20:20 ` Julia Lawall
2024-03-21 22:27 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2024-03-22 1:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-22 1:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-22 7:24 ` Julia Lawall [this message]
2024-03-22 15:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-22 5:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-22 8:48 ` Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82b49991-eb5a-7e8c-67e0-b0fd932f40b4@inria.fr \
--to=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.czapnik@intel.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).