From: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
daichi1.fukui@toshiba.co.jp, nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp,
Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.4.y, v4.9.y] igb: Remove incorrect "unexpected SYS WRAP" log message
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:38:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnu6sjh2.fsf@kokedama.swc.toshiba.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YDddMnkytDS76mYN@kroah.com> (Greg KH's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:17:54 +0100")
Hi Greg,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 09:54:06AM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>> From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
>>
>> commit 2643e6e90210e16c978919617170089b7c2164f7 upstream
>>
>> TSAUXC.DisableSystime is never set, so SYSTIM runs into a SYS WRAP
>> every 1100 secs on 80580/i350/i354 (40 bit SYSTIM) and every 35000
>> secs on 80576 (45 bit SYSTIM).
>>
>> This wrap event sets the TSICR.SysWrap bit unconditionally.
>>
>> However, checking TSIM at interrupt time shows that this event does not
>> actually cause the interrupt. Rather, it's just bycatch while the
>> actual interrupt is caused by, for instance, TSICR.TXTS.
>>
>> The conclusion is that the SYS WRAP is actually expected, so the
>> "unexpected SYS WRAP" message is entirely bogus and just helps to
>> confuse users. Drop it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
>> Acked-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
>> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
>> ---
>> [ Due to confusion about stable rules for networking the request was
>> mistakenly sent to netdev only[0]. Apologies if you're seeing this
>> again. ]
>
> No signed-off-by: from you? :(
Apologies for the missing the SoB. And thank you for applying the patch
to stable even so.
[ Sorry for the long dealy in responding. Our mail system was having
issues (dropping emails randomly) and looks like this mail got caught up
during that period. ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-25 0:54 [PATCH v4.4.y, v4.9.y] igb: Remove incorrect "unexpected SYS WRAP" log message Punit Agrawal
2021-02-25 8:17 ` Greg KH
2021-03-17 0:38 ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-10 1:34 Punit Agrawal
2021-02-10 1:46 ` Keller, Jacob E
2021-02-24 2:28 ` Punit Agrawal
[not found] ` <20210224085126.45af7b68@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
2021-02-25 0:44 ` Punit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnu6sjh2.fsf@kokedama.swc.toshiba.co.jp \
--to=punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp \
--cc=aaron.f.brown@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=daichi1.fukui@toshiba.co.jp \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinschen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).