Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: rtl8366: Check VLAN ID and not ports

[Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>]

On 9/28/2019 1:26 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 6:40 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9/27/19 9:39 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> There has been some confusion between the port number and
>>> the VLAN ID in this driver. What we need to check for
>>> validity is the VLAN ID, nothing else.
>>>
>>> The current confusion came from assigning a few default
>>> VLANs for default routing and we need to rewrite that
>>> properly.
>>>
>>> Instead of checking if the port number is a valid VLAN
>>> ID, check the actual VLAN IDs passed in to the callback
>>> one by one as expected.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d8652956cf37 ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
>>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c | 12 ++++++++----
>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
>>> index ca3d17e43ed8..e2c91b75e843 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
>>> @@ -340,9 +340,11 @@ int rtl8366_vlan_prepare(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>>>  {
>>>       struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
>>>       int ret;
>>> +     int i;
>>>
>>> -     if (!smi->ops->is_vlan_valid(smi, port))
>>> -             return -EINVAL;
>>> +     for (i = vlan->vid_begin; i < vlan->vid_end; i++)
>>> +             if (!smi->ops->is_vlan_valid(smi, port))
>>> +                     return -EINVAL;
>>
>> You are still checking the port and not the "i" (VLAN ID) argument here,
>> is there something I am missing?
> 
> No you're right, just correcting old mistakes by making
> new mistakes .. I'll fix, thanks!
> 
Do we need to duplicate the same is_vlan_valid() check in both the
vlan_prepare and vlan_add callbacks?
-- 
Florian