* [PATCH bpf] bpftool: Remove redundant "HAVE" prefix from the large INSN limit check
@ 2020-02-02 11:02 Michal Rostecki
2020-02-02 19:59 ` Yonghong Song
2020-02-03 23:10 ` Daniel Borkmann
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michal Rostecki @ 2020-02-02 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
Yonghong Song, Andrii Nakryiko, netdev, linux-kernel
"HAVE" prefix is already applied by default to feature macros and before
this change, the large INSN limit macro had the incorrect name with
double "HAVE".
Fixes: 2faef64aa6b3 ("bpftool: Add misc section and probe for large INSN limit")
Signed-off-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@opensuse.org>
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
index 446ba891f1e2..941873d778d8 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ probe_large_insn_limit(const char *define_prefix, __u32 ifindex)
res = bpf_probe_large_insn_limit(ifindex);
print_bool_feature("have_large_insn_limit",
"Large program size limit",
- "HAVE_LARGE_INSN_LIMIT",
+ "LARGE_INSN_LIMIT",
res, define_prefix);
}
--
2.16.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf] bpftool: Remove redundant "HAVE" prefix from the large INSN limit check
2020-02-02 11:02 [PATCH bpf] bpftool: Remove redundant "HAVE" prefix from the large INSN limit check Michal Rostecki
@ 2020-02-02 19:59 ` Yonghong Song
2020-02-03 23:10 ` Daniel Borkmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2020-02-02 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Rostecki, bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
Andrii Nakryiko, netdev, linux-kernel
On 2/2/20 3:02 AM, Michal Rostecki wrote:
> "HAVE" prefix is already applied by default to feature macros and before
> this change, the large INSN limit macro had the incorrect name with
> double "HAVE".
>
> Fixes: 2faef64aa6b3 ("bpftool: Add misc section and probe for large INSN limit")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@opensuse.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf] bpftool: Remove redundant "HAVE" prefix from the large INSN limit check
2020-02-02 11:02 [PATCH bpf] bpftool: Remove redundant "HAVE" prefix from the large INSN limit check Michal Rostecki
2020-02-02 19:59 ` Yonghong Song
@ 2020-02-03 23:10 ` Daniel Borkmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2020-02-03 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Rostecki, bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
Andrii Nakryiko, netdev, linux-kernel
On 2/2/20 12:02 PM, Michal Rostecki wrote:
> "HAVE" prefix is already applied by default to feature macros and before
> this change, the large INSN limit macro had the incorrect name with
> double "HAVE".
>
> Fixes: 2faef64aa6b3 ("bpftool: Add misc section and probe for large INSN limit")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@opensuse.org>
Applied, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-03 23:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-02 11:02 [PATCH bpf] bpftool: Remove redundant "HAVE" prefix from the large INSN limit check Michal Rostecki
2020-02-02 19:59 ` Yonghong Song
2020-02-03 23:10 ` Daniel Borkmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).