netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Hemminger, Stephen" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>,
	Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>, Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio: Define bit numbers for device independent features
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:06:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEvNoG89M0m_=Z9E-d2U0tPJ2_-eiEEj3s_FGYOKTbkH0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220216071553.GB2109@mtl-vdi-166.wap.labs.mlnx>

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 3:16 PM Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 02:06:54PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > 在 2022/2/10 下午5:27, Eli Cohen 写道:
> > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 04:35:28PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 4:31 PM Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:54:57PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 8:56 PM Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Define bit fields for device independent feature bits. We need them in a
> > > > > > > follow up patch.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also, define macros for start and end of these feature bits.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >   include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 16 ++++++++--------
> > > > > > >   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > index 3bf6c8bf8477..6d92cc31a8d3 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > @@ -45,14 +45,14 @@
> > > > > > >   /* We've given up on this device. */
> > > > > > >   #define VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED         0x80
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -/*
> > > > > > > - * Virtio feature bits VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START through
> > > > > > > - * VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END are reserved for the transport
> > > > > > > - * being used (e.g. virtio_ring, virtio_pci etc.), the
> > > > > > > - * rest are per-device feature bits.
> > > > > > > - */
> > > > > > > -#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START       28
> > > > > > > -#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END         38
> > > > > > > +/* Device independent features per virtio spec 1.1 range from 28 to 38 */
> > > > > > > +#define VIRTIO_DEV_INDEPENDENT_F_START 28
> > > > > > > +#define VIRTIO_DEV_INDEPENDENT_F_END   38
> > > > > > Haven't gone through patch 3 but I think it's probably better not
> > > > > > touch uapi stuff. Or we can define those macros in other place?
> > > > > >
> > > > > I can put it in vdpa.c
> > > > >
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +#define VIRTIO_F_RING_INDIRECT_DESC 28
> > > > > > > +#define VIRTIO_F_RING_EVENT_IDX 29
> > > > > > > +#define VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER 35
> > > > > > > +#define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA 38
> > > > > > This part belongs to the virtio_ring.h any reason not pull that file
> > > > > > instead of squashing those into virtio_config.h?
> > > > > >
> > > > > Not sure what you mean here. I can't find virtio_ring.h in my tree.
> > > > I meant just copy the virtio_ring.h in the linux tree. It seems cleaner.
> > > I will still miss VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM and VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA
> > > which are only defined in drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi_pcol.h for block
> > > devices only.
> > >
> > > What would you suggest to do with them? Maybe define them in vdpa.c?
> >
> >
> > I meant maybe we need a full synchronization from the current Linux uapi
> > headers for virtio_config.h and and add virtio_ring.h here.
> >
>
> virtio_config.h is updatd already and virtio_ring.h does not add any
> flag definition that we're missing.
>
> The flags I was missing are
> +#define VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER 35
> +#define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA 38

Right, so Gautam posted a path for _F_IN_ORDER [1].

We probably need another patch for NOTIFICATION_DATA.


>
> and both of these do not appear in the linux headers. They appear as
> block specific flags:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi_pcol.h:21471:#define VIRTIO_BLK_CONFIG_VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER_LBN 35
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi_pcol.h:21480:#define VIRTIO_BLK_CONFIG_VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA_LBN 38
>
> So I just defined these two in vdpa.c (in patch v1).

Fine, but we need to remove them if we get update from linux kernel uapi headers

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/2/15/43

Thanks

>
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >   #ifndef VIRTIO_CONFIG_NO_LEGACY
> > > > > > >   /* Do we get callbacks when the ring is completely used, even if we've
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > 2.34.1
> > > > > > >
> >
>


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-17  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-07 12:55 [PATCH 0/3] vdpa tool support for configuring max VQs Eli Cohen
2022-02-07 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] vdpa: Remove unsupported command line option Eli Cohen
2022-02-10  7:50   ` Jason Wang
2022-02-07 12:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] virtio: Define bit numbers for device independent features Eli Cohen
2022-02-10  7:54   ` Jason Wang
2022-02-10  8:30     ` Eli Cohen
2022-02-10  8:35       ` Jason Wang
2022-02-10  9:27         ` Eli Cohen
2022-02-14  6:06           ` Jason Wang
2022-02-16  7:15             ` Eli Cohen
2022-02-17  6:06               ` Jason Wang [this message]
2022-02-17  8:26                 ` Eli Cohen
2022-02-07 12:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] vdpa: Add support to configure max number of VQs Eli Cohen
2022-02-10  8:07   ` Jason Wang
2022-02-10  8:44     ` Eli Cohen
2022-02-10  8:51       ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACGkMEvNoG89M0m_=Z9E-d2U0tPJ2_-eiEEj3s_FGYOKTbkH0w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=elic@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gdawar@xilinx.com \
    --cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).