From: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@gmail.com>
To: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@intel.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: issues with vxlan RX checksum offload under OVS datapath
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:55:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZOPZJ6xj=fOAY9rkXZZs99ONkHwcW8RMXb+H2FjJzV3eoAPg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALnjE+rUTejbU_d39G7WSn=k0aY2xELCE3UxjDr_Zdq3iwHbNA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com> wrote:
>> While testing the gro udp patches over a setup with openvswitch I noted that
>> the RX checksum offload support introduced by Joseph's commit 0afb166
>> "vxlan: Add capability of Rx checksum offload for inner packet" works fine
>> when you use a setup made of
>> NIC --> IP stack --> vxlan device --> bridge --> tap
>> but not when its
>> NIC --> IP stack --> ovs vxlan port --> OVS DP --> tap
>> I narrowed it down to the fact the when going the OVS pathskb->encapsulation
>> remains true also after the decap is done. Basically, this is the original hunk
[...]
>>> + skb->encapsulation = 0;
[...]
>> Moving this to shared code (while removing the check for
>> vxlan->dev->features) made things to work on my setup, but this misses one
>> of the original conditions, ideas?
> I kept csum check in vxlan-device recv path for same reason. As of now
> there is no efficient way to get ovs-dev features.
> May be we can cache device features in struct datapath from datapath-netdev.
To be a bit more precise/concrete here, do we agree that the both paths must do
skb->encapsulation = 0;
which is done now only by the non-ovs path
Or.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-21 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-19 22:05 issues with vxlan RX checksum offload under OVS datapath Or Gerlitz
2014-01-21 17:30 ` Pravin Shelar
2014-01-21 17:37 ` Jesse Gross
2014-01-21 20:55 ` Or Gerlitz [this message]
2014-01-21 21:47 ` Joseph Gasparakis
2014-01-21 21:43 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-01-21 22:35 ` Joseph Gasparakis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZOPZJ6xj=fOAY9rkXZZs99ONkHwcW8RMXb+H2FjJzV3eoAPg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=or.gerlitz@gmail.com \
--cc=joseph.gasparakis@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=pshelar@nicira.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).