From: Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@gmail.com>
To: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, subashab@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] qmi_wwan: Clone the skb when in pass-through mode
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:49:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfDRXgZeWCeGXhfukeeAGrHHUMtsHWRPEebUkZf07QCnU4CFw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8735tky064.fsf@miraculix.mork.no>
Hi Bjørn,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 4:46 PM Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out. But it still looks strange to me. Why do
> we call netif_rx(skb) here instead of just returning 1 and leave that
> for usbnet_skb_return()? With cloning we end up doing eth_type_trans()
> on the duplicate - is that wise?
Thanks for pointing this out. You are right and looking at the code
again, we should end up in usbnet_skb_return() if the call to netif_rx
is succesful. I do agree that calling netif_rx() is a bit strange,
considering that usbnet_skb_return() already calls this function.
Perhaps the issue is that we end up calling netif_rx() on the same skb
twice? rmnet also frees the skb when done with the de-aggregation.
I will do some more testing tomorrow and see if I can figure out
something. So far, the only thing I know is that if I try to perform a
more demanding transfer (like downloading a file) using qmi_wwan +
rmnet then I get a kernel oops immediatly.
Kristian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-14 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-14 14:18 [PATCH net] qmi_wwan: Clone the skb when in pass-through mode Kristian Evensen
2021-06-14 14:45 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-06-14 15:49 ` Kristian Evensen [this message]
2021-06-14 17:02 ` Kristian Evensen
2021-06-14 20:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-06-15 6:24 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-06-15 9:03 ` Kristian Evensen
2021-06-15 10:04 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-06-15 10:51 ` Kristian Evensen
2021-06-15 11:04 ` Kristian Evensen
2021-06-15 13:39 ` Bjørn Mork
2021-06-15 19:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-06-15 19:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-06-16 10:08 ` Kristian Evensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKfDRXgZeWCeGXhfukeeAGrHHUMtsHWRPEebUkZf07QCnU4CFw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kristian.evensen@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).