netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
To: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-sctp @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:50:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALx6S36A3Ai=6HJqpdQAm4W0parSG2_KmHZOAmHwomZY78ePvQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03f4d4bb40e78f228923dd61bc3d30f737a7621e.1488199633.git.dcaratti@redhat.com>

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com> wrote:
> Introduce skb->csum_not_inet to identify not-yet-checksummed SCTP packets.
> Use this bit in combination with netdev feature bit in validate_xmit_skb,
> to discriminate whether skb needs crc32c or 2-complement Internet Checksum
> (or none of the two, when the underlying device can do checksum offload).
>
> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/skbuff.h                |  1 +
>  net/core/dev.c                        | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c |  1 +
>  net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto_sctp.c     |  1 +
>  net/sched/act_csum.c                  |  1 +
>  net/sctp/output.c                     |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 0671131..236b7d9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -759,6 +759,7 @@ struct sk_buff {
>         __u8                    tc_redirected:1;
>         __u8                    tc_from_ingress:1;
>  #endif
> +       __u8                    csum_not_inet:1;
>
Unfortunately this potentially pushes the skbuf flags over 32 bits if
I count correctly. I suggest that you rename csum_bad to
csum_not_inet. Looks like csum_bad is only set by a grand total of one
driver and I don't believe that is enough to justify its existence.
It's probably a good time to remove it.

>  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_SCHED
>         __u16                   tc_index;       /* traffic control index */
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index b9fb843..fae3217 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2614,6 +2614,7 @@ int skb_sctp_csum_help(struct sk_buff *skb)
>         }
>         *(__le32 *)(skb->data + offset) = crc32c_csum;
>         skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> +       skb->csum_not_inet = 0;
>  out:
>         return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2960,6 +2961,16 @@ static struct sk_buff *validate_xmit_vlan(struct sk_buff *skb,
>         return skb;
>  }
>
> +static int skb_csum_hwoffload_help(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +                                  netdev_features_t features)
> +{
> +       if (unlikely(skb->csum_not_inet))
> +               return !(features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC) ?
> +                               skb_sctp_csum_help(skb) : 0;
> +
Return value looks complex. Maybe we should just change
skb_csum_*_help to return bool, true of checksum was handled false if
not.

> +       return !(features & NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK) ? skb_checksum_help(skb) : 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct sk_buff *validate_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  {
>         netdev_features_t features;
> @@ -2995,8 +3006,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *validate_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device
>                         else
>                                 skb_set_transport_header(skb,
>                                                          skb_checksum_start_offset(skb));
> -                       if (!(features & NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK) &&
> -                           skb_checksum_help(skb))
> +                       if (skb_csum_hwoffload_help(skb, features))
>                                 goto out_kfree_skb;
>                 }
>         }
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> index d952d67..4972a60 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static void sctp_nat_csum(struct sk_buff *skb, sctp_sctphdr_t *sctph,
>                           unsigned int sctphoff)
>  {
>         sctph->checksum = sctp_compute_cksum(skb, sctphoff);
> +       skb->csum_not_inet = 0;
>         skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto_sctp.c
> index 31d3586..9459b88 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ sctp_manip_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
>         if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
>                 hdr->checksum = sctp_compute_cksum(skb, hdroff);
> +               skb->csum_not_inet = 0;
>                 skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
>         }
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_csum.c b/net/sched/act_csum.c
> index e978ccd4..85cb150 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_csum.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_csum.c
> @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ static int tcf_csum_sctp(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int ihl,
>
>         sctph->checksum = sctp_compute_cksum(skb,
>                                              skb_network_offset(skb) + ihl);
> +       skb->csum_not_inet = 0;
>         skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
>
>         return 1;
> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
> index 814eac0..0dc227b 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
> @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ static int sctp_packet_pack(struct sctp_packet *packet,
>         } else {
>  chksum:
>                 head->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> +               head->csum_not_inet = 1;
>                 head->csum_start = skb_transport_header(head) - head->head;
>                 head->csum_offset = offsetof(struct sctphdr, checksum);
>         }
> --
> 2.7.4
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-28 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-23 16:52 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] net: improve support for SCTP checksums Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/5] net: split skb_checksum_help Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 20:59   ` Tom Herbert
2017-01-24 16:35     ` David Laight
2017-02-02 15:07       ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-02 16:55         ` David Laight
2017-02-02 18:08         ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-27 13:39           ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-27 15:11             ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-28 10:31               ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32             ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 1/4] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32               ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/4] net: introduce skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32               ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 19:50                 ` Tom Herbert [this message]
2017-02-28 10:32               ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 4/4] Documentation: update notes on checksum offloading Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 22:46               ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 1/4] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Alexander Duyck
2017-03-01  3:17                 ` Tom Herbert
2017-03-01 10:53                 ` David Laight
2017-03-06 21:51                 ` Davide Caratti
2017-03-07 18:06                   ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-18 13:17                     ` Davide Caratti
2017-03-18 22:35                       ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 14:16                         ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/7] improve CRC32c in the forwarding path Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16                           ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 1/7] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16                           ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 2/7] net: introduce skb_crc32c_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16                           ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 3/7] sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16                           ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 4/7] net: use skb->csum_algo to identify packets needing crc32c Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 15:43                             ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 17:29                               ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 18:11                                 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-13 10:36                                   ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38                                   ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 0/7] net: improve support for SCTP checksums Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38                                     ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 1/7] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38                                     ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 2/7] net: introduce skb_crc32c_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-04-27 12:29                                       ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-04-20 13:38                                     ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 3/7] sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff Davide Caratti
2017-04-27  1:34                                       ` [sk_buff] 95510aef27: BUG:Bad_page_state_in_process kernel test robot
2017-04-29 20:21                                       ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 3/7] sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff Tom Herbert
2017-04-20 13:38                                     ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/7] net: use skb->csum_not_inet to identify packets needing crc32c Davide Caratti
2017-04-29 20:18                                       ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-20 13:38                                     ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 5/7] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb() Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38                                     ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 6/7] openvswitch: more accurate checksumming in queue_userspace_packet() Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38                                     ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 7/7] sk_buff.h: improve description of CHECKSUM_{COMPLETE,UNNECESSARY} Davide Caratti
2017-04-29 20:20                                       ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-27 12:41                                     ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 0/7] net: improve support for SCTP checksums Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-04-07 14:16                           ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 5/7] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb() Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16                           ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 6/7] openvswitch: more accurate checksumming in queue_userspace_packet() Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16                           ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 7/7] sk_buff.h: improve description of CHECKSUM_{COMPLETE,UNNECESSARY} Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/5] net: introduce skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/5] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/5] Documentation: add description of skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALx6S36A3Ai=6HJqpdQAm4W0parSG2_KmHZOAmHwomZY78ePvQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=tom@herbertland.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).