netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] netdevsim: move devlink registration under the instance lock
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:49:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7hC/FYhXz+OlM4l@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230106063402.485336-10-kuba@kernel.org>

Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 07:34:02AM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>To prevent races with netdev code accessing free devlink instances
>move the registration under the devlink instance lock.
>Core now waits for the instance to be registered before accessing it.

This sentense sounds a bit confusing to me. "to be registered" does not
sound correct.

"Core now waits for the instance lock to be unlocked before executing
 access the instance" perhaps would be more accurate?


>
>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

One way or another. Code looks fine:
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-06 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-06  6:33 [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:17   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] devlink: update the code in netns move to latest helpers Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] devlink: protect devlink->dev by the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:18   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] devlink: always check if the devlink instance is registered Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:41   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:03   ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-06 21:19     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07  9:05       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] devlink: remove the registration guarantee of references Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:42   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] devlink: don't require setting features before registration Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:43   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] devlink: allow registering parameters after the instance Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:55   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 21:22     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07  9:20       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10  0:21       ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-10 16:35         ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 20:22           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11  9:32             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 16:45               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 21:29                 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-12  7:07                   ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 14:59                     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 19:58                       ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13  7:50                         ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-15  8:35                           ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-16 10:33                             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-16 11:25                               ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 19:20                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-12 20:09                       ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 22:44                         ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-13  6:45                           ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13  7:53                             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 13:21   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] netdevsim: rename a label Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:56   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] netdevsim: move devlink registration under the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 15:49   ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-06 15:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:06 ` Jacob Keller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7hC/FYhXz+OlM4l@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).