From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/9] devlink: allow registering parameters after the instance
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 10:20:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7k5TWKqvMrfjEfV@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230106132251.29565214@kernel.org>
Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 10:22:51PM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 13:55:53 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >@@ -5263,7 +5263,13 @@ static void devlink_param_notify(struct devlink *devlink,
>> > WARN_ON(cmd != DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_NEW && cmd != DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_DEL &&
>> > cmd != DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_PARAM_NEW &&
>> > cmd != DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_PARAM_DEL);
>> >- ASSERT_DEVLINK_REGISTERED(devlink);
>> >+
>> >+ /* devlink_notify_register() / devlink_notify_unregister()
>> >+ * will replay the notifications if the params are added/removed
>> >+ * outside of the lifetime of the instance.
>> >+ */
>> >+ if (!devl_is_registered(devlink))
>> >+ return;
>>
>> This helper would be nice to use on other places as well.
>> Like devlink_trap_group_notify(), devlink_trap_notify() and others. I
>> will take care of that in a follow-up.
>
>Alternatively we could reorder back to registering sub-objects
>after the instance and not have to worry about re-sending
>notifications :S
Hmm, let me explore that path. Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-07 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-06 6:33 [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:17 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] devlink: update the code in netns move to latest helpers Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] devlink: protect devlink->dev by the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] devlink: always check if the devlink instance is registered Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:41 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:03 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-06 21:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07 9:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] devlink: remove the registration guarantee of references Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:42 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] devlink: don't require setting features before registration Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] devlink: allow registering parameters after the instance Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 21:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07 9:20 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-01-10 0:21 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-10 16:35 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 20:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 9:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 16:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 21:29 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-12 7:07 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 14:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 19:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13 7:50 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-15 8:35 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-16 10:33 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-16 11:25 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 19:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-12 20:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 22:44 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-13 6:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13 7:53 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 13:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] netdevsim: rename a label Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] netdevsim: move devlink registration under the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 15:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-06 15:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:06 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7k5TWKqvMrfjEfV@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).