From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@openvpn.net>
Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 1/2] udp: call udp_encap_enable for v6 sockets when enabling encap
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 13:28:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkgzbTKdmAekAq6p@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5553cba-c29d-0a22-c362-0ce1e1ef4b41@openvpn.net>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 03:06:41PM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29/03/2022 15:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > I would like to propose to take this patch in stable releases.
> > > Greg, is this an option?
> > >
> > > Commit in the linux kernel is:
> > > a4a600dd301ccde6ea239804ec1f19364a39d643
> >
> >
> > What stable tree(s) should this apply to, and where have you tested it?
>
> Sorry for the delay, Greg, but I wanted to run some extra tests on the
> various longterm kernel releases.
>
> This bug exists since "ever", therefore ideally it could/should be applied
> to all stable trees.
>
> However, this patch applies as-is only to v5.10 and v5.4 (you need to ignore
> the hunk for 'drivers/net/bareudp.c' on the latter).
>
> Older trees require a different code change.
>
> My tests on v5.10 and v5.4 show that the patch works as expected.
>
> Therefore, could it be backported to these 2 trees?
> It can get my
>
> Tested-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@openvpn.net>
Now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-02 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-03 8:54 [PATCHv5 net-next 0/2] net: enable udp v6 sockets receiving v4 packets with UDP Xin Long
2021-02-03 8:54 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 1/2] udp: call udp_encap_enable for v6 sockets when enabling encap Xin Long
2021-02-03 8:54 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 2/2] rxrpc: call udp_tunnel_encap_enable in rxrpc_open_socket Xin Long
2021-02-03 9:50 ` David Howells
2022-03-29 13:24 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 1/2] udp: call udp_encap_enable for v6 sockets when enabling encap Antonio Quartulli
2022-03-29 13:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-31 13:06 ` Antonio Quartulli
2022-04-02 11:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-02-05 3:00 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 0/2] net: enable udp v6 sockets receiving v4 packets with UDP patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkgzbTKdmAekAq6p@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=antonio@openvpn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).