netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] net: Avoid allocing memory on memoryless numa node
@ 2020-10-11  4:11 Xianting Tian
  2020-10-11 19:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Xianting Tian @ 2020-10-11  4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem, kuba; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Xianting Tian

In architecture like powerpc, we can have cpus without any local memory
attached to it. In such cases the node does not have real memory.

Use local_memory_node(), which is guaranteed to have memory.
local_memory_node is a noop in other architectures that does not support
memoryless nodes.

Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 266073e30..dcb4533ef 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2590,7 +2590,7 @@ static struct xps_map *expand_xps_map(struct xps_map *map, int attr_index,
 		new_map = kzalloc(XPS_MAP_SIZE(alloc_len), GFP_KERNEL);
 	else
 		new_map = kzalloc_node(XPS_MAP_SIZE(alloc_len), GFP_KERNEL,
-				       cpu_to_node(attr_index));
+				       local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(attr_index)));
 	if (!new_map)
 		return NULL;
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net: Avoid allocing memory on memoryless numa node
  2020-10-11  4:11 [PATCH] net: Avoid allocing memory on memoryless numa node Xianting Tian
@ 2020-10-11 19:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
  2020-10-12  0:14   ` Tianxianting
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2020-10-11 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xianting Tian; +Cc: davem, netdev, linux-kernel

On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 12:11:40 +0800 Xianting Tian wrote:
> In architecture like powerpc, we can have cpus without any local memory
> attached to it. In such cases the node does not have real memory.
> 
> Use local_memory_node(), which is guaranteed to have memory.
> local_memory_node is a noop in other architectures that does not support
> memoryless nodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
> ---
>  net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 266073e30..dcb4533ef 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2590,7 +2590,7 @@ static struct xps_map *expand_xps_map(struct xps_map *map, int attr_index,
>  		new_map = kzalloc(XPS_MAP_SIZE(alloc_len), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	else
>  		new_map = kzalloc_node(XPS_MAP_SIZE(alloc_len), GFP_KERNEL,
> -				       cpu_to_node(attr_index));
> +				       local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(attr_index)));
>  	if (!new_map)
>  		return NULL;
>  

Are we going to patch all kmalloc_node() callers now to apply
local_memory_node()?  Can't the allocator take care of this?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] net: Avoid allocing memory on memoryless numa node
  2020-10-11 19:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2020-10-12  0:14   ` Tianxianting
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tianxianting @ 2020-10-12  0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Kicinski; +Cc: davem, netdev, linux-kernel

Hi Jakub,
Thanks for your suggestion,
Let me try it :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jakub Kicinski [mailto:kuba@kernel.org] 
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 3:18 AM
To: tianxianting (RD) <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Avoid allocing memory on memoryless numa node

On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 12:11:40 +0800 Xianting Tian wrote:
> In architecture like powerpc, we can have cpus without any local 
> memory attached to it. In such cases the node does not have real memory.
> 
> Use local_memory_node(), which is guaranteed to have memory.
> local_memory_node is a noop in other architectures that does not 
> support memoryless nodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
> ---
>  net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index 
> 266073e30..dcb4533ef 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2590,7 +2590,7 @@ static struct xps_map *expand_xps_map(struct xps_map *map, int attr_index,
>  		new_map = kzalloc(XPS_MAP_SIZE(alloc_len), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	else
>  		new_map = kzalloc_node(XPS_MAP_SIZE(alloc_len), GFP_KERNEL,
> -				       cpu_to_node(attr_index));
> +				       local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(attr_index)));
>  	if (!new_map)
>  		return NULL;
>  

Are we going to patch all kmalloc_node() callers now to apply local_memory_node()?  Can't the allocator take care of this?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-12  0:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-11  4:11 [PATCH] net: Avoid allocing memory on memoryless numa node Xianting Tian
2020-10-11 19:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-12  0:14   ` Tianxianting

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).