netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/18] netfilter: fix possible removal of wrong hook
Date: Tue,  4 Aug 2015 12:02:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438682568-8346-14-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438682568-8346-1-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org>

nf_unregister_net_hook() uses the nf_hook_ops fields as tuple to look up for
the corresponding hook in the list. However, we may have two hooks with exactly
the same configuration.

This shouldn't be a problem for nftables since every new chain has an unique
priv field set, but this may still cause us problems in the future, so better
address this problem now by keeping a reference to the original nf_hook_ops
structure to make sure we delete the right hook from nf_unregister_net_hook().

Fixes: 085db2c04557 ("netfilter: Per network namespace netfilter hooks.")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 net/netfilter/core.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
index 12504fbb..0ecb2b5 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
@@ -78,26 +78,27 @@ static struct list_head *find_nf_hook_list(struct net *net,
 	return nf_hook_list;
 }
 
+struct nf_hook_entry {
+	const struct nf_hook_ops	*orig_ops;
+	struct nf_hook_ops		ops;
+};
+
 int nf_register_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 {
 	struct list_head *nf_hook_list;
-	struct nf_hook_ops *elem, *new;
+	struct nf_hook_entry *entry;
+	struct nf_hook_ops *elem;
 
-	new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!new)
+	entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!entry)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	new->hook     = reg->hook;
-	new->dev      = reg->dev;
-	new->owner    = reg->owner;
-	new->priv     = reg->priv;
-	new->pf       = reg->pf;
-	new->hooknum  = reg->hooknum;
-	new->priority = reg->priority;
+	entry->orig_ops	= reg;
+	entry->ops	= *reg;
 
 	nf_hook_list = find_nf_hook_list(net, reg);
 	if (!nf_hook_list) {
-		kfree(new);
+		kfree(entry);
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
 
@@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ int nf_register_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 		if (reg->priority < elem->priority)
 			break;
 	}
-	list_add_rcu(&new->list, elem->list.prev);
+	list_add_rcu(&entry->ops.list, elem->list.prev);
 	mutex_unlock(&nf_hook_mutex);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS
 	if (reg->pf == NFPROTO_NETDEV && reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS)
@@ -122,6 +123,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_register_net_hook);
 void nf_unregister_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 {
 	struct list_head *nf_hook_list;
+	struct nf_hook_entry *entry;
 	struct nf_hook_ops *elem;
 
 	nf_hook_list = find_nf_hook_list(net, reg);
@@ -130,14 +132,9 @@ void nf_unregister_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 
 	mutex_lock(&nf_hook_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(elem, nf_hook_list, list) {
-		if ((reg->hook     == elem->hook) &&
-		    (reg->dev      == elem->dev) &&
-		    (reg->owner    == elem->owner) &&
-		    (reg->priv     == elem->priv) &&
-		    (reg->pf       == elem->pf) &&
-		    (reg->hooknum  == elem->hooknum) &&
-		    (reg->priority == elem->priority)) {
-			list_del_rcu(&elem->list);
+		entry = container_of(elem, struct nf_hook_entry, ops);
+		if (entry->orig_ops == reg) {
+			list_del_rcu(&entry->ops.list);
 			break;
 		}
 	}
@@ -154,8 +151,8 @@ void nf_unregister_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 	static_key_slow_dec(&nf_hooks_needed[reg->pf][reg->hooknum]);
 #endif
 	synchronize_net();
-	nf_queue_nf_hook_drop(net, elem);
-	kfree(elem);
+	nf_queue_nf_hook_drop(net, &entry->ops);
+	kfree(entry);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_unregister_net_hook);
 
-- 
1.7.10.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-04 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-04 10:02 [PATCH 00/18] Netfilter updates for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 01/18] netfilter: kill nf_hooks_active Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 02/18] netfilter: Simply the tests for enabling and disabling the ingress queue hook Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 03/18] netfilter: Factor out the hook list selection from nf_register_hook Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 04/18] netfilter: Per network namespace netfilter hooks Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 05/18] netfilter: nftables: Only run the nftables chains in the proper netns Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 06/18] netfilter: xtables: compute exact size needed for jumpstack Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 07/18] netfilter: move tee_active to core Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 08/18] netfilter: xtables: don't save/restore jumpstack offset Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/18] netfilter: add and use jump label for xt_tee Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/18] netfilter: xtables: remove __pure annotation Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 11/18] netfilter: Fix memory leak in nf_register_net_hook Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 12/18] netfilter: nf_queue: fix nf_queue_nf_hook_drop() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 14/18] netfilter: rename local nf_hook_list to hook_list Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 15/18] netfilter: nf_ct_sctp: minimal multihoming support Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 16/18] netfilter: bridge: reduce nf_bridge_info to 32 bytes again Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 17/18] netfilter: bridge: do not initialize statics to 0 or NULL Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 18/18] netfilter: ip6t_REJECT: Remove debug messages from reject_tg6() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-08-05  7:00 ` [PATCH 00/18] Netfilter updates for net-next David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1438682568-8346-14-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).