netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH ghak124 v3fix] audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg
@ 2020-06-28  3:24 Richard Guy Briggs
  2020-06-29 23:23 ` Paul Moore
  2020-07-03 12:40 ` Jones Desougi
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Guy Briggs @ 2020-06-28  3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux-Audit Mailing List, LKML, netfilter-devel
  Cc: Paul Moore, sgrubb, omosnace, fw, twoerner, eparis, tgraf,
	dan.carpenter, Richard Guy Briggs

Fixed an inconsistent use of GFP flags in nft_obj_notify() that used
GFP_KERNEL when a GFP flag was passed in to that function.  Given this
allocated memory was then used in audit_log_nfcfg() it led to an audit
of all other GFP allocations in net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c and a
modification of audit_log_nfcfg() to accept a GFP parameter.

Reported-by: Dan Carptenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
---
Passes audit-testsuite.

 include/linux/audit.h           |  8 ++++----
 kernel/auditsc.c                |  4 ++--
 net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c |  6 +++---
 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c   | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
 net/netfilter/x_tables.c        |  5 +++--
 5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
index 604ede630580..d93739f7a35a 100644
--- a/include/linux/audit.h
+++ b/include/linux/audit.h
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ extern int __audit_log_bprm_fcaps(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
 extern void __audit_tk_injoffset(struct timespec64 offset);
 extern void __audit_ntp_log(const struct audit_ntp_data *ad);
 extern void __audit_log_nfcfg(const char *name, u8 af, unsigned int nentries,
-			      enum audit_nfcfgop op);
+			      enum audit_nfcfgop op, gfp_t gfp);
 
 static inline void audit_ipc_obj(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
 {
@@ -542,10 +542,10 @@ static inline void audit_ntp_log(const struct audit_ntp_data *ad)
 
 static inline void audit_log_nfcfg(const char *name, u8 af,
 				   unsigned int nentries,
-				   enum audit_nfcfgop op)
+				   enum audit_nfcfgop op, gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	if (audit_enabled)
-		__audit_log_nfcfg(name, af, nentries, op);
+		__audit_log_nfcfg(name, af, nentries, op, gfp);
 }
 
 extern int audit_n_rules;
@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static inline void audit_ptrace(struct task_struct *t)
 
 static inline void audit_log_nfcfg(const char *name, u8 af,
 				   unsigned int nentries,
-				   enum audit_nfcfgop op)
+				   enum audit_nfcfgop op, gfp_t gfp)
 { }
 
 #define audit_n_rules 0
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index 3a9100e95fda..eae1a599ffe3 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -2572,12 +2572,12 @@ void __audit_ntp_log(const struct audit_ntp_data *ad)
 }
 
 void __audit_log_nfcfg(const char *name, u8 af, unsigned int nentries,
-		       enum audit_nfcfgop op)
+		       enum audit_nfcfgop op, gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	struct audit_buffer *ab;
 	char comm[sizeof(current->comm)];
 
-	ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_NETFILTER_CFG);
+	ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), gfp, AUDIT_NETFILTER_CFG);
 	if (!ab)
 		return;
 	audit_log_format(ab, "table=%s family=%u entries=%u op=%s",
diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
index c83ffe912163..b13b49b9f75c 100644
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
@@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ static int do_replace_finish(struct net *net, struct ebt_replace *repl,
 	vfree(counterstmp);
 
 	audit_log_nfcfg(repl->name, AF_BRIDGE, repl->nentries,
-			AUDIT_XT_OP_REPLACE);
+			AUDIT_XT_OP_REPLACE, GFP_KERNEL);
 	return ret;
 
 free_unlock:
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ static void __ebt_unregister_table(struct net *net, struct ebt_table *table)
 	list_del(&table->list);
 	mutex_unlock(&ebt_mutex);
 	audit_log_nfcfg(table->name, AF_BRIDGE, table->private->nentries,
-			AUDIT_XT_OP_UNREGISTER);
+			AUDIT_XT_OP_UNREGISTER, GFP_KERNEL);
 	EBT_ENTRY_ITERATE(table->private->entries, table->private->entries_size,
 			  ebt_cleanup_entry, net, NULL);
 	if (table->private->nentries)
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ int ebt_register_table(struct net *net, const struct ebt_table *input_table,
 	}
 
 	audit_log_nfcfg(repl->name, AF_BRIDGE, repl->nentries,
-			AUDIT_XT_OP_REGISTER);
+			AUDIT_XT_OP_REGISTER, GFP_KERNEL);
 	return ret;
 free_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&ebt_mutex);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 164700273947..f7ff91479647 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -702,7 +702,8 @@ static void nf_tables_table_notify(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, int event)
 			ctx->table->use,
 			event == NFT_MSG_NEWTABLE ?
 				AUDIT_NFT_OP_TABLE_REGISTER :
-				AUDIT_NFT_OP_TABLE_UNREGISTER);
+				AUDIT_NFT_OP_TABLE_UNREGISTER,
+			GFP_KERNEL);
 	kfree(buf);
 
 	if (!ctx->report &&
@@ -1448,7 +1449,8 @@ static void nf_tables_chain_notify(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, int event)
 			ctx->chain->use,
 			event == NFT_MSG_NEWCHAIN ?
 				AUDIT_NFT_OP_CHAIN_REGISTER :
-				AUDIT_NFT_OP_CHAIN_UNREGISTER);
+				AUDIT_NFT_OP_CHAIN_UNREGISTER,
+			GFP_KERNEL);
 	kfree(buf);
 
 	if (!ctx->report &&
@@ -2724,7 +2726,8 @@ static void nf_tables_rule_notify(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 			rule->handle,
 			event == NFT_MSG_NEWRULE ?
 				AUDIT_NFT_OP_RULE_REGISTER :
-				AUDIT_NFT_OP_RULE_UNREGISTER);
+				AUDIT_NFT_OP_RULE_UNREGISTER,
+			GFP_KERNEL);
 	kfree(buf);
 
 	if (!ctx->report &&
@@ -3737,7 +3740,8 @@ static void nf_tables_set_notify(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 			set->field_count,
 			event == NFT_MSG_NEWSET ?
 				AUDIT_NFT_OP_SET_REGISTER :
-				AUDIT_NFT_OP_SET_UNREGISTER);
+				AUDIT_NFT_OP_SET_UNREGISTER,
+			gfp_flags);
 	kfree(buf);
 
 	if (!ctx->report &&
@@ -4864,7 +4868,8 @@ static void nf_tables_setelem_notify(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 			set->handle,
 			event == NFT_MSG_NEWSETELEM ?
 				AUDIT_NFT_OP_SETELEM_REGISTER :
-				AUDIT_NFT_OP_SETELEM_UNREGISTER);
+				AUDIT_NFT_OP_SETELEM_UNREGISTER,
+			GFP_KERNEL);
 	kfree(buf);
 
 	if (!ctx->report && !nfnetlink_has_listeners(net, NFNLGRP_NFTABLES))
@@ -5956,7 +5961,8 @@ static int nf_tables_dump_obj(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 				audit_log_nfcfg(buf,
 						family,
 						obj->handle,
-						AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_RESET);
+						AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_RESET,
+						GFP_KERNEL);
 				kfree(buf);
 			}
 
@@ -6071,13 +6077,14 @@ static int nf_tables_getobj(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
 		reset = true;
 
 	if (reset) {
-		char *buf = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%llu;?:0",
+		char *buf = kasprintf(GFP_ATOMIC, "%s:%llu;?:0",
 				      table->name, table->handle);
 
 		audit_log_nfcfg(buf,
 				family,
 				obj->handle,
-				AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_RESET);
+				AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_RESET,
+				GFP_KERNEL);
 		kfree(buf);
 	}
 
@@ -6156,7 +6163,7 @@ void nft_obj_notify(struct net *net, const struct nft_table *table,
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	int err;
-	char *buf = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%llu;?:0",
+	char *buf = kasprintf(gfp, "%s:%llu;?:0",
 			      table->name, table->handle);
 
 	audit_log_nfcfg(buf,
@@ -6164,7 +6171,8 @@ void nft_obj_notify(struct net *net, const struct nft_table *table,
 			obj->handle,
 			event == NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ ?
 				AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_REGISTER :
-				AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_UNREGISTER);
+				AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_UNREGISTER,
+			GFP_KERNEL);
 	kfree(buf);
 
 	if (!report &&
@@ -6954,7 +6962,8 @@ static void nf_tables_flowtable_notify(struct nft_ctx *ctx,
 			flowtable->hooknum,
 			event == NFT_MSG_NEWFLOWTABLE ?
 				AUDIT_NFT_OP_FLOWTABLE_REGISTER :
-				AUDIT_NFT_OP_FLOWTABLE_UNREGISTER);
+				AUDIT_NFT_OP_FLOWTABLE_UNREGISTER,
+			GFP_KERNEL);
 	kfree(buf);
 
 	if (ctx->report &&
@@ -7078,7 +7087,7 @@ static void nf_tables_gen_notify(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	int err;
 
 	audit_log_nfcfg("?:0;?:0", 0, net->nft.base_seq,
-			AUDIT_NFT_OP_GEN_REGISTER);
+			AUDIT_NFT_OP_GEN_REGISTER, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (nlmsg_report(nlh) &&
 	    !nfnetlink_has_listeners(net, NFNLGRP_NFTABLES))
diff --git a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
index 99a468be4a59..9ad8f3ff66f5 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
@@ -1410,7 +1410,8 @@ struct xt_table_info *
 
 	audit_log_nfcfg(table->name, table->af, private->number,
 			!private->number ? AUDIT_XT_OP_REGISTER :
-					   AUDIT_XT_OP_REPLACE);
+					   AUDIT_XT_OP_REPLACE,
+			GFP_KERNEL);
 	return private;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_replace_table);
@@ -1473,7 +1474,7 @@ void *xt_unregister_table(struct xt_table *table)
 	list_del(&table->list);
 	mutex_unlock(&xt[table->af].mutex);
 	audit_log_nfcfg(table->name, table->af, private->number,
-			AUDIT_XT_OP_UNREGISTER);
+			AUDIT_XT_OP_UNREGISTER, GFP_KERNEL);
 	kfree(table);
 
 	return private;
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH ghak124 v3fix] audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg
  2020-06-28  3:24 [PATCH ghak124 v3fix] audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg Richard Guy Briggs
@ 2020-06-29 23:23 ` Paul Moore
  2020-07-03 12:40 ` Jones Desougi
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2020-06-29 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Guy Briggs
  Cc: Linux-Audit Mailing List, LKML, netfilter-devel, sgrubb,
	Ondrej Mosnacek, fw, twoerner, Eric Paris, tgraf, dan.carpenter

On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 11:25 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Fixed an inconsistent use of GFP flags in nft_obj_notify() that used
> GFP_KERNEL when a GFP flag was passed in to that function.  Given this
> allocated memory was then used in audit_log_nfcfg() it led to an audit
> of all other GFP allocations in net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c and a
> modification of audit_log_nfcfg() to accept a GFP parameter.
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carptenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> ---
> Passes audit-testsuite.
>
>  include/linux/audit.h           |  8 ++++----
>  kernel/auditsc.c                |  4 ++--
>  net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c |  6 +++---
>  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c   | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  net/netfilter/x_tables.c        |  5 +++--
>  5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Merged into audit/next.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH ghak124 v3fix] audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg
  2020-06-28  3:24 [PATCH ghak124 v3fix] audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg Richard Guy Briggs
  2020-06-29 23:23 ` Paul Moore
@ 2020-07-03 12:40 ` Jones Desougi
  2020-07-03 13:41   ` Paul Moore
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jones Desougi @ 2020-07-03 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Guy Briggs
  Cc: Linux-Audit Mailing List, LKML, netfilter-devel, Paul Moore,
	sgrubb, omosnace, Florian Westphal, twoerner, eparis, tgraf,
	dan.carpenter

Doesn't seem entirely consistent now either though. Two cases below.

   /Jones

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 5:27 AM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Fixed an inconsistent use of GFP flags in nft_obj_notify() that used
> GFP_KERNEL when a GFP flag was passed in to that function.  Given this
> allocated memory was then used in audit_log_nfcfg() it led to an audit
> of all other GFP allocations in net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c and a
> modification of audit_log_nfcfg() to accept a GFP parameter.
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carptenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> ---
> Passes audit-testsuite.
>
>  include/linux/audit.h           |  8 ++++----
>  kernel/auditsc.c                |  4 ++--
>  net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c |  6 +++---
>  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c   | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  net/netfilter/x_tables.c        |  5 +++--
>  5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
...
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> index 164700273947..f7ff91479647 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
...
> @@ -6071,13 +6077,14 @@ static int nf_tables_getobj(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
>                 reset = true;
>
>         if (reset) {
> -               char *buf = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%llu;?:0",
> +               char *buf = kasprintf(GFP_ATOMIC, "%s:%llu;?:0",
>                                       table->name, table->handle);
>
>                 audit_log_nfcfg(buf,
>                                 family,
>                                 obj->handle,
> -                               AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_RESET);
> +                               AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_RESET,
> +                               GFP_KERNEL);
>                 kfree(buf);
>         }
>

Replaces one GFP_KERNEL (with GFP_ATOMIC) but also adds a new one in
the following statement.
Is that intentional?

> @@ -6156,7 +6163,7 @@ void nft_obj_notify(struct net *net, const struct nft_table *table,
>  {
>         struct sk_buff *skb;
>         int err;
> -       char *buf = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%llu;?:0",
> +       char *buf = kasprintf(gfp, "%s:%llu;?:0",
>                               table->name, table->handle);
>
>         audit_log_nfcfg(buf,
> @@ -6164,7 +6171,8 @@ void nft_obj_notify(struct net *net, const struct nft_table *table,
>                         obj->handle,
>                         event == NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ ?
>                                 AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_REGISTER :
> -                               AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_UNREGISTER);
> +                               AUDIT_NFT_OP_OBJ_UNREGISTER,
> +                       GFP_KERNEL);
>         kfree(buf);
>
>         if (!report &&

It would seem these two hunks form a similar discrepancy.

...

> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH ghak124 v3fix] audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg
  2020-07-03 12:40 ` Jones Desougi
@ 2020-07-03 13:41   ` Paul Moore
  2020-07-03 14:19     ` Richard Guy Briggs
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2020-07-03 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jones Desougi, Richard Guy Briggs
  Cc: Linux-Audit Mailing List, LKML, netfilter-devel, sgrubb,
	Ondrej Mosnacek, Florian Westphal, twoerner, Eric Paris, tgraf,
	dan.carpenter

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 8:41 AM Jones Desougi
<jones.desougi+netfilter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Doesn't seem entirely consistent now either though. Two cases below.

Yes, you're right, that patch was incorrect; thanks for catching that.
I just posted a fix (lore link below) that fixes the two problems you
pointed out as well as converts a call in a RCU protected section to
an ATOMIC.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-audit/159378341669.5956.13490174029711421419.stgit@sifl

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH ghak124 v3fix] audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg
  2020-07-03 13:41   ` Paul Moore
@ 2020-07-03 14:19     ` Richard Guy Briggs
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Guy Briggs @ 2020-07-03 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Moore
  Cc: Jones Desougi, Linux-Audit Mailing List, LKML, netfilter-devel,
	sgrubb, Ondrej Mosnacek, Florian Westphal, twoerner, Eric Paris,
	tgraf, dan.carpenter

On 2020-07-03 09:41, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 8:41 AM Jones Desougi
> <jones.desougi+netfilter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't seem entirely consistent now either though. Two cases below.
> 
> Yes, you're right, that patch was incorrect; thanks for catching that.
> I just posted a fix (lore link below) that fixes the two problems you
> pointed out as well as converts a call in a RCU protected section to
> an ATOMIC.

Thanks Paul.  I was just about to switch branches and fix these.  :-)
I really need to upgrade this devel machine so I can use git 2.x
worktrees...

I checked all of these (I thought) thoroughly before I started changing
code and obviously didn't after.  :-/

> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-audit/159378341669.5956.13490174029711421419.stgit@sifl
> 
> paul moore

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-03 14:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-28  3:24 [PATCH ghak124 v3fix] audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg Richard Guy Briggs
2020-06-29 23:23 ` Paul Moore
2020-07-03 12:40 ` Jones Desougi
2020-07-03 13:41   ` Paul Moore
2020-07-03 14:19     ` Richard Guy Briggs

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).