From: "Liu, Jingqi" <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
To: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ndctl/dimm: Fix to dump namespace indexs and labels
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:31:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b92ffef-c01d-05fc-3cf6-2f7565b5fb69@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210609030642.66204-1-jingqi.liu@intel.com>
Hi Dan,
This is the second version of the patch.
Any comments?
Thanks,
Jingqi
On 6/9/2021 11:06 AM, Liu, Jingqi wrote:
> The following bug is caused by setting the size of Label Index Block
> to a fixed 256 bytes.
>
> Use the following Qemu command to start a Guest with 2MB label-size:
> -object memory-backend-file,id=mem1,share=on,mem-path=/dev/dax1.1,size=14G,align=2M
> -device nvdimm,memdev=mem1,id=nv1,label-size=2M
>
> There is a namespace in the Guest as follows:
> $ ndctl list
> [
> {
> "dev":"namespace0.0",
> "mode":"devdax",
> "map":"dev",
> "size":14780727296,
> "uuid":"58ad5282-5a16-404f-b8ee-e28b4c784eb8",
> "chardev":"dax0.0",
> "align":2097152,
> "name":"namespace0.0"
> }
> ]
>
> Fail to read labels. The result is as follows:
> $ ndctl read-labels -u nmem0
> [
> ]
> read 0 nmem
>
> If using the following Qemu command to start the Guest with 128K
> label-size, this label can be read correctly.
> -object memory-backend-file,id=mem1,share=on,mem-path=/dev/dax1.1,size=14G,align=2M
> -device nvdimm,memdev=mem1,id=nv1,label-size=128K
>
> The size of a Label Index Block depends on how many label slots fit into
> the label storage area. The minimum size of an index block is 256 bytes
> and the size must be a multiple of 256 bytes. For a storage area of 128KB,
> the corresponding Label Index Block size is 256 bytes. But if the label
> storage area is not 128KB, the Label Index Block size should not be 256 bytes.
>
> Namespace Label Index Block appears twice at the top of the label storage area.
> Following the two index blocks, an array for storing labels takes up the
> remainder of the label storage area.
>
> For obtaining the size of Namespace Index Block, we also cannot rely on
> the field of 'mysize' in this index block since it might be corrupted.
> Similar to the linux kernel, we use sizeof_namespace_index() to get the size
> of Namespace Index Block. Then we can also correctly calculate the starting
> offset of the following namespace labels.
>
> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> ndctl/dimm.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> ndctl/lib/dimm.c | 5 +++++
> ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym | 1 +
> ndctl/libndctl.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ndctl/dimm.c b/ndctl/dimm.c
> index 09ce49e..1d2d9a2 100644
> --- a/ndctl/dimm.c
> +++ b/ndctl/dimm.c
> @@ -94,13 +94,18 @@ static struct json_object *dump_label_json(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm,
> struct json_object *jarray = json_object_new_array();
> struct json_object *jlabel = NULL;
> struct namespace_label nslabel;
> + unsigned int nsindex_size;
> unsigned int slot = -1;
> ssize_t offset;
>
> if (!jarray)
> return NULL;
>
> - for (offset = NSINDEX_ALIGN * 2; offset < size;
> + nsindex_size = ndctl_dimm_sizeof_namespace_index(dimm);
> + if (nsindex_size == 0)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + for (offset = nsindex_size * 2; offset < size;
> offset += ndctl_dimm_sizeof_namespace_label(dimm)) {
> ssize_t len = min_t(ssize_t,
> ndctl_dimm_sizeof_namespace_label(dimm),
> @@ -204,17 +209,23 @@ static struct json_object *dump_label_json(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm,
> return jarray;
> }
>
> -static struct json_object *dump_index_json(struct ndctl_cmd *cmd_read, ssize_t size)
> +static struct json_object *dump_index_json(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm,
> + struct ndctl_cmd *cmd_read, ssize_t size)
> {
> struct json_object *jarray = json_object_new_array();
> struct json_object *jindex = NULL;
> struct namespace_index nsindex;
> + unsigned int nsindex_size;
> ssize_t offset;
>
> if (!jarray)
> return NULL;
>
> - for (offset = 0; offset < NSINDEX_ALIGN * 2; offset += NSINDEX_ALIGN) {
> + nsindex_size = ndctl_dimm_sizeof_namespace_index(dimm);
> + if (nsindex_size == 0)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + for (offset = 0; offset < nsindex_size * 2; offset += nsindex_size) {
> ssize_t len = min_t(ssize_t, sizeof(nsindex), size - offset);
> struct json_object *jobj;
>
> @@ -288,7 +299,7 @@ static struct json_object *dump_json(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm,
> goto err;
> json_object_object_add(jdimm, "dev", jobj);
>
> - jindex = dump_index_json(cmd_read, size);
> + jindex = dump_index_json(dimm, cmd_read, size);
> if (!jindex)
> goto err;
> json_object_object_add(jdimm, "index", jindex);
> diff --git a/ndctl/lib/dimm.c b/ndctl/lib/dimm.c
> index c045cbe..9e36e28 100644
> --- a/ndctl/lib/dimm.c
> +++ b/ndctl/lib/dimm.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,11 @@ static int __label_validate(struct nvdimm_data *ndd)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +NDCTL_EXPORT unsigned int ndctl_dimm_sizeof_namespace_index(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm)
> +{
> + return sizeof_namespace_index(&dimm->ndd);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * If the dimm labels have not been previously validated this routine
> * will make up a default size. Otherwise, it will pick the size based
> diff --git a/ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym b/ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym
> index 0a82616..0ce2bb9 100644
> --- a/ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym
> +++ b/ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym
> @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ global:
> ndctl_dimm_validate_labels;
> ndctl_dimm_init_labels;
> ndctl_dimm_sizeof_namespace_label;
> + ndctl_dimm_sizeof_namespace_index;
> ndctl_mapping_get_position;
> ndctl_namespace_set_enforce_mode;
> ndctl_namespace_get_enforce_mode;
> diff --git a/ndctl/libndctl.h b/ndctl/libndctl.h
> index 60e1288..9a1a799 100644
> --- a/ndctl/libndctl.h
> +++ b/ndctl/libndctl.h
> @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ int ndctl_dimm_init_labels(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm,
> enum ndctl_namespace_version v);
> unsigned long ndctl_dimm_get_available_labels(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm);
> unsigned int ndctl_dimm_sizeof_namespace_label(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm);
> +unsigned int ndctl_dimm_sizeof_namespace_index(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm);
> unsigned int ndctl_cmd_cfg_size_get_size(struct ndctl_cmd *cfg_size);
> ssize_t ndctl_cmd_cfg_read_get_data(struct ndctl_cmd *cfg_read, void *buf,
> unsigned int len, unsigned int offset);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-16 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-09 3:06 [PATCH] ndctl/dimm: Fix to dump namespace indexs and labels Jingqi Liu
2021-06-16 1:31 ` Liu, Jingqi [this message]
2021-07-02 4:41 ` Dan Williams
2021-07-08 0:21 ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-07-08 1:53 ` Liu, Jingqi
2021-07-08 5:59 ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-07-08 6:52 ` Liu, Jingqi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-03 1:25 Jingqi Liu
2021-06-07 20:03 ` Dan Williams
2021-06-09 1:27 ` Liu, Jingqi
2021-06-02 12:18 Jingqi Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b92ffef-c01d-05fc-3cf6-2f7565b5fb69@intel.com \
--to=jingqi.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).