nvdimm.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Zhang, Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/4] kvm: add a check if pfn is from NVDIMM pmem.
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:20:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fefbd66e-623d-b6a5-7202-5309dd4f5b32@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4ifg2BZMTNfu6mg0xxtPWs3BVgkfEj51v1CQ6jp2S70fw@mail.gmail.com>

Am 19.09.18 um 04:53 schrieb Dan Williams:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 2:25 AM Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> For device specific memory space, when we move these area of pfn to
>> memory zone, we will set the page reserved flag at that time, some of
>> these reserved for device mmio, and some of these are not, such as
>> NVDIMM pmem.
>> Now, we map these dev_dax or fs_dax pages to kvm for DIMM/NVDIMM
>> backend, since these pages are reserved, the check of
>> kvm_is_reserved_pfn() misconceives those pages as MMIO. Therefor, we
>> introduce 2 page map types, MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX/MEMORY_DEVICE_DEV_DAX,
>> to identify these pages are from NVDIMM pmem and let kvm treat these
>> as normal pages.
>> Without this patch, many operations will be missed due to this
>> mistreatment to pmem pages, for example, a page may not have chance to
>> be unpinned for KVM guest(in kvm_release_pfn_clean), not able to be
>> marked as dirty/accessed(in kvm_set_pfn_dirty/accessed) etc.
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> index c44c406..9c49634 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> @@ -147,8 +147,20 @@ __weak void kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>>  bool kvm_is_reserved_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
>>  {
>> -       if (pfn_valid(pfn))
>> -               return PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>> +       struct page *page;
>> +
>> +       if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
>> +               page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>> +
>> +               /*
>> +                * For device specific memory space, there is a case
>> +                * which we need pass MEMORY_DEVICE_FS[DEV]_DAX pages
>> +                * to kvm, these pages marked reserved flag as it is a
>> +                * zone device memory, we need to identify these pages
>> +                * and let kvm treat these as normal pages
>> +                */
>> +               return PageReserved(page) && !is_dax_page(page);
> Should we consider just not setting PageReserved for
> devm_memremap_pages()? Perhaps kvm is not be the only component making
> these assumptions about this flag?

I was asking the exact same question in v3 or so.

I was recently going through all PageReserved users, trying to clean up
and document how it is used.

PG_reserved used to be a marker "not available for the page allocator".
This is only partially true and not really helpful I think. My current

PG_reserved is set for special pages, struct pages of such pages should
in general not be touched except by their owner. Pages marked as
reserved include:
- Kernel image (including vDSO) and similar (e.g. BIOS, initrd)
- Pages allocated early during boot (bootmem, memblock)
- Zero pages
- Pages that have been associated with a zone but were not onlined
  (e.g. NVDIMM/pmem, online_page_callback used by XEN)
- Pages to exclude from the hibernation image (e.g. loaded kexec images)
- MCA (memory error) pages on ia64
- Offline pages
Some architectures don't allow to ioremap RAM pages that are not marked
as reserved. Allocated pages might have to be set reserved to allow for
that - if there is a good reason to enforce this. Consequently,
PG_reserved part of a user space table might be the indicator for the
zero page, pmem or MMIO pages.

Swapping code does not care about PageReserved at all as far as I
remember. This seems to be fine as it only looks at the way pages have
been mapped into user space.

I don't really see a good reason to set pmem pages as reserved. One
question would be, how/if to exclude them from the hibernation image.
But that could also be solved differently (we would have to double check
how they are handled in hibernation code).

A similar user of PageReserved to look at is:


It will not mark pages dirty if they are reserved. Similar to KVM code.

> Why is MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC memory specifically excluded?
> This has less to do with "dax" pages and more to do with
> devm_memremap_pages() established ranges. P2PDMA is another producer
> of these pages. If either MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC or P2PDMA pages can be
> used in these kvm paths then I think this points to consider clearing
> the Reserved flag.
> That said I haven't audited all the locations that test PageReserved().
> Sorry for not responding sooner I was on extended leave.



David / dhildenb
Linux-nvdimm mailing list

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-19  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07 18:03 [PATCH V5 0/4] Fix kvm misconceives NVDIMM pages as reserved mmio Zhang Yi
2018-09-07 17:04 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2018-09-18 14:31   ` Yi Zhang
2018-09-07 18:03 ` [PATCH V5 1/4] kvm: remove redundant reserved page check Zhang Yi
2018-09-07 18:03 ` [PATCH V5 2/4] mm: introduce memory type MEMORY_DEVICE_DEV_DAX Zhang Yi
2018-09-07 18:03 ` [PATCH V5 3/4] mm: add a function to differentiate the pages is from DAX device memory Zhang Yi
2018-09-07 18:04 ` [PATCH V5 4/4] kvm: add a check if pfn is from NVDIMM pmem Zhang Yi
2018-09-19  2:53   ` Dan Williams
2018-09-19  7:20     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2018-09-20 22:49       ` Yi Zhang
2018-09-20 21:19         ` Dan Williams
2018-09-21 22:47           ` Yi Zhang
2018-09-21 14:23             ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-21 18:17               ` Dan Williams
2018-09-21 19:29                 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-10-19 16:33                   ` Barret Rhoden
2018-10-22  8:47                     ` Yi Zhang
2018-09-19 10:55 ` [PATCH V5 0/4] Fix kvm misconceives NVDIMM pages as reserved mmio Yi Zhang
2018-09-19  2:43   ` Pankaj Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fefbd66e-623d-b6a5-7202-5309dd4f5b32@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yu.c.zhang@intel.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).