ocfs2-devel.oss.oracle.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
To: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: "jack@suse.cz" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"darrick.wong@oracle.com" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>,
	"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 08/10] fsdax: Dedup file range to use a compare function
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 03:21:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <TY2PR01MB2921EBF98C2AC2900799FB85F4749@TY2PR01MB2921.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401111120.2ukog26aoyvyysyz@riteshh-domain>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] fsdax: Dedup file range to use a compare function
> 
> On 21/03/19 09:52AM, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > With dax we cannot deal with readpage() etc. So, we create a dax
> > comparison funciton which is similar with
> > vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare().
> > And introduce dax_remap_file_range_prep() for filesystem use.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/dax.c             | 56
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  fs/remap_range.c     | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c |  9 +++++--
> >  include/linux/dax.h  |  4 ++++
> >  include/linux/fs.h   | 15 ++++++++----
> >  5 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> > index 348297b38f76..76f81f1d76ec 100644
> > --- a/fs/dax.c
> > +++ b/fs/dax.c
> > @@ -1833,3 +1833,59 @@ vm_fault_t dax_finish_sync_fault(struct vm_fault
> *vmf,
> >  	return dax_insert_pfn_mkwrite(vmf, pfn, order);  }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_finish_sync_fault);
> > +
> > +static loff_t dax_range_compare_actor(struct inode *ino1, loff_t pos1,
> > +		struct inode *ino2, loff_t pos2, loff_t len, void *data,
> > +		struct iomap *smap, struct iomap *dmap) {
> > +	void *saddr, *daddr;
> > +	bool *same = data;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (smap->type == IOMAP_HOLE && dmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE) {
> > +		*same = true;
> > +		return len;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (smap->type == IOMAP_HOLE || dmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE) {
> > +		*same = false;
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = dax_iomap_direct_access(smap, pos1, ALIGN(pos1 + len, PAGE_SIZE),
> > +				      &saddr, NULL);
> 
> shouldn't it take len as the second argument?

The second argument of dax_iomap_direct_access() means offset, and the third one means length.  So, I think this is right.

> 
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +
> > +	ret = dax_iomap_direct_access(dmap, pos2, ALIGN(pos2 + len, PAGE_SIZE),
> > +				      &daddr, NULL);
> 
> ditto.
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +
> > +	*same = !memcmp(saddr, daddr, len);
> > +	return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int dax_dedupe_file_range_compare(struct inode *src, loff_t srcoff,
> > +		struct inode *dest, loff_t destoff, loff_t len, bool *is_same,
> > +		const struct iomap_ops *ops)
> > +{
> > +	int id, ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	id = dax_read_lock();
> > +	while (len) {
> > +		ret = iomap_apply2(src, srcoff, dest, destoff, len, 0, ops,
> > +				   is_same, dax_range_compare_actor);
> > +		if (ret < 0 || !*is_same)
> > +			goto out;
> > +
> > +		len -= ret;
> > +		srcoff += ret;
> > +		destoff += ret;
> > +	}
> > +	ret = 0;
> > +out:
> > +	dax_read_unlock(id);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_dedupe_file_range_compare);
> > diff --git a/fs/remap_range.c b/fs/remap_range.c index
> > 77dba3a49e65..9079390edaf3 100644
> > --- a/fs/remap_range.c
> > +++ b/fs/remap_range.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/compat.h>
> >  #include <linux/mount.h>
> >  #include <linux/fs.h>
> > +#include <linux/dax.h>
> >  #include "internal.h"
> >
> >  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > @@ -199,9 +200,9 @@ static void vfs_unlock_two_pages(struct page *page1,
> struct page *page2)
> >   * Compare extents of two files to see if they are the same.
> >   * Caller must have locked both inodes to prevent write races.
> >   */
> > -static int vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare(struct inode *src, loff_t srcoff,
> > -					 struct inode *dest, loff_t destoff,
> > -					 loff_t len, bool *is_same)
> > +int vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare(struct inode *src, loff_t srcoff,
> > +				  struct inode *dest, loff_t destoff,
> > +				  loff_t len, bool *is_same)
> >  {
> >  	loff_t src_poff;
> >  	loff_t dest_poff;
> > @@ -280,6 +281,7 @@ static int vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare(struct
> > inode *src, loff_t srcoff,
> >  out_error:
> >  	return error;
> >  }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare);
> >
> >  /*
> >   * Check that the two inodes are eligible for cloning, the ranges
> > make @@ -289,9 +291,11 @@ static int
> vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare(struct inode *src, loff_t srcoff,
> >   * If there's an error, then the usual negative error code is returned.
> >   * Otherwise returns 0 with *len set to the request length.
> >   */
> > -int generic_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> > -				  struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> > -				  loff_t *len, unsigned int remap_flags)
> > +static int
> > +__generic_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> > +				struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> > +				loff_t *len, unsigned int remap_flags,
> > +				const struct iomap_ops *ops)
> >  {
> >  	struct inode *inode_in = file_inode(file_in);
> >  	struct inode *inode_out = file_inode(file_out); @@ -351,8 +355,15 @@
> > int generic_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >  	if (remap_flags & REMAP_FILE_DEDUP) {
> >  		bool		is_same = false;
> >
> > -		ret = vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare(inode_in, pos_in,
> > -				inode_out, pos_out, *len, &is_same);
> > +		if (!IS_DAX(inode_in) && !IS_DAX(inode_out))
> > +			ret = vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare(inode_in, pos_in,
> > +					inode_out, pos_out, *len, &is_same);
> > +		else if (IS_DAX(inode_in) && IS_DAX(inode_out) && ops)
> > +			ret = dax_dedupe_file_range_compare(inode_in, pos_in,
> > +					inode_out, pos_out, *len, &is_same,
> > +					ops);
> > +		else
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> >  		if (!is_same)
> 
> should we consider to check !is_same check b4?
> you should maybe relook at this error handling side of code.
> we still return len from actor function but is_same is set to false.
> So we are essentially returning ret (positive value), instead should be returning
> -EBADE because of !memcmp

The ret from compare function will not be positive, it will always be 0 or negative.  
In addition, if something wrong happens, is_same will always be false.  The caller could not get correct errno if check !is_same firstly.

> 
> > @@ -370,6 +381,24 @@ int generic_remap_file_range_prep(struct file
> > *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > +
> > +int dax_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> > +			      struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> > +			      loff_t *len, unsigned int remap_flags,
> > +			      const struct iomap_ops *ops) {
> > +	return __generic_remap_file_range_prep(file_in, pos_in, file_out,
> > +					       pos_out, len, remap_flags, ops); }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dax_remap_file_range_prep);
> > +
> > +int generic_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> > +				  struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> > +				  loff_t *len, unsigned int remap_flags) {
> > +	return __generic_remap_file_range_prep(file_in, pos_in, file_out,
> > +					       pos_out, len, remap_flags, NULL); }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_remap_file_range_prep);
> >
> >  loff_t do_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, diff
> > --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c index
> > 6fa05fb78189..f5b3a3da36b7 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > @@ -1308,8 +1308,13 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_prep(
> >  	if (IS_DAX(inode_in) || IS_DAX(inode_out))
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> >
> > -	ret = generic_remap_file_range_prep(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out,
> > -			len, remap_flags);
> > +	if (IS_DAX(inode_in))
> 
> if (!IS_DAX(inode_in)) no?
My mistake...
> 
> > +		ret = generic_remap_file_range_prep(file_in, pos_in, file_out,
> > +						    pos_out, len, remap_flags);
> > +	else
> > +		ret = dax_remap_file_range_prep(file_in, pos_in, file_out,
> > +						pos_out, len, remap_flags,
> > +						&xfs_read_iomap_ops);
> >  	if (ret || *len == 0)
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h index
> > 3275e01ed33d..32e1c34349f2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dax.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dax.h
> > @@ -239,6 +239,10 @@ int dax_invalidate_mapping_entry_sync(struct
> address_space *mapping,
> >  				      pgoff_t index);
> >  s64 dax_iomap_zero(loff_t pos, u64 length, struct iomap *iomap,
> >  		struct iomap *srcmap);
> > +int dax_dedupe_file_range_compare(struct inode *src, loff_t srcoff,
> > +				  struct inode *dest, loff_t destoff,
> > +				  loff_t len, bool *is_same,
> > +				  const struct iomap_ops *ops);
> >  static inline bool dax_mapping(struct address_space *mapping)  {
> >  	return mapping->host && IS_DAX(mapping->host); diff --git
> > a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index
> > fd47deea7c17..2e6ec5bdf82a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct fsverity_info;  struct fsverity_operations;
> > struct fs_context;  struct fs_parameter_spec;
> > +struct iomap_ops;
> >
> >  extern void __init inode_init(void);
> >  extern void __init inode_init_early(void); @@ -1910,13 +1911,19 @@
> > extern ssize_t vfs_read(struct file *, char __user *, size_t, loff_t
> > *);  extern ssize_t vfs_write(struct file *, const char __user *,
> > size_t, loff_t *);  extern ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *, loff_t , struct
> file *,
> >  				   loff_t, size_t, unsigned int);
> > +typedef int (*compare_range_t)(struct inode *src, loff_t srcpos,
> > +			       struct inode *dest, loff_t destpos,
> > +			       loff_t len, bool *is_same);
> 
> Is this used anywhere?

No, I forgot to remove it...


--
Thanks,
Ruan Shiyang.
> 
> >  extern ssize_t generic_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >  				       struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> >  				       size_t len, unsigned int flags); -extern int
> > generic_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> > -					 struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> > -					 loff_t *count,
> > -					 unsigned int remap_flags);
> > +int generic_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> > +				  struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> > +				  loff_t *count, unsigned int remap_flags); int
> > +dax_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> > +			      struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> > +			      loff_t *len, unsigned int remap_flags,
> > +			      const struct iomap_ops *ops);
> >  extern loff_t do_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >  				  struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> >  				  loff_t len, unsigned int remap_flags);
> > --
> > 2.30.1
> >
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-19  1:52 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 00/10] fsdax, xfs: Add reflink&dedupe support for fsdax Shiyang Ruan
2021-03-19  1:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 01/10] fsdax: Factor helpers to simplify dax fault code Shiyang Ruan
2021-03-23 15:33   ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-03-19  1:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 02/10] fsdax: Factor helper: dax_fault_actor() Shiyang Ruan
2021-03-23 15:48   ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-03-31  3:57     ` ruansy.fnst
2021-04-02  7:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-19  1:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 03/10] fsdax: Output address in dax_iomap_pfn() and rename it Shiyang Ruan
2021-03-23 15:54   ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-03-19  1:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 04/10] fsdax: Introduce dax_iomap_cow_copy() Shiyang Ruan
2021-03-23 16:08   ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-03-19  1:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 05/10] fsdax: Replace mmap entry in case of CoW Shiyang Ruan
2021-04-01  6:39   ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-04-01  7:03     ` ruansy.fnst
2021-03-19  1:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 06/10] fsdax: Add dax_iomap_cow_copy() for dax_iomap_zero Shiyang Ruan
2021-04-01  6:45   ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-04-01  7:00     ` ruansy.fnst
2021-03-19  1:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 07/10] iomap: Introduce iomap_apply2() for operations on two files Shiyang Ruan
2021-04-01  7:12   ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-03-19  1:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 08/10] fsdax: Dedup file range to use a compare function Shiyang Ruan
2021-04-01 11:11   ` Ritesh Harjani
2021-04-08  3:21     ` ruansy.fnst [this message]
2021-03-19  1:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 09/10] fs/xfs: Handle CoW for fsdax write() path Shiyang Ruan
2021-03-19  1:52 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 10/10] fs/xfs: Add dedupe support for fsdax Shiyang Ruan
2021-03-23 15:27 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 00/10] fsdax, xfs: Add reflink&dedupe " Ritesh Harjani
2021-04-02  7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-02  8:18   ` ruansy.fnst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=TY2PR01MB2921EBF98C2AC2900799FB85F4749@TY2PR01MB2921.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --subject='Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 08/10] fsdax: Dedup file range to use a compare function' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).