openbmc.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1 0/1] clk: npcm7xx: fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name
@ 2018-11-11 13:47 tali.perry1
  2018-11-11 13:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] clk: npcm7xx: get fixed clocks from DT tali.perry1
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: tali.perry1 @ 2018-11-11 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brendanhiggins, robh+dt, mark.rutland, linux, avifishman70,
	tmaimon77, raltherr, mturquette, sboyd
  Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, openbmc, linux-clk,
	Tali Perry, Wei Yongjun

From: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>

Nuvoton NPCM7XX Clock Controller
fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name error handling.
    Also update error messages to be more informative.
    
    In case clk_base allocation is erronoeous the return value is null.
    Also fix handling of of_clk_get_by_name returns an error. 
    Print a better error message pointing to the dt-binding documention.

This patch is re-submitted since it was already pushed to main 
(just the diff, without the full driver which is already in 
master branch.)


Signed-off-by: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

---

Tali Perry (1):
  clk: npcm7xx: get fixed clocks from DT

 drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 1/1] clk: npcm7xx: get fixed clocks from DT
  2018-11-11 13:47 [PATCH v1 0/1] clk: npcm7xx: fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name tali.perry1
@ 2018-11-11 13:47 ` tali.perry1
  2018-11-30  0:23   ` Stephen Boyd
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: tali.perry1 @ 2018-11-11 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: brendanhiggins, robh+dt, mark.rutland, linux, avifishman70,
	tmaimon77, raltherr, mturquette, sboyd
  Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, openbmc, linux-clk,
	Tali Perry, Wei Yongjun

From: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>

Nuvoton NPCM7XX Clock Controller
fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name error handling.
    Also update error messages to be more informative.
    
    In case clk_base allocation is erronoeous the return value is null.
    Also fix handling of of_clk_get_by_name returns an error. 
    Print a better error message pointing to the dt-binding documention.

This patch is re-submitted since it was already pushed to main 
(just the diff, without the full driver which is already in 
master branch.)


Signed-off-by: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

---
 drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c b/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c
index 740af90a9508..91a937720f4e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c
@@ -7,17 +7,26 @@
  * Copyright (C) 2018 Nuvoton Technologies tali.perry@nuvoton.com
  */
 
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
-#include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_address.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/err.h>
-#include <linux/bitfield.h>
-
-#include <dt-bindings/clock/nuvoton,npcm7xx-clock.h>
+
+
+
+ #include <linux/module.h>
+ #include <linux/clk.h>
+ #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+ #include <linux/device.h>
+ #include <linux/io.h>
+ #include <linux/kernel.h>
+ #include <linux/of.h>
+ #include <linux/of_device.h>
+ #include <linux/of_platform.h>
+ #include <linux/of_address.h>
+ #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+ #include <linux/slab.h>
+ #include <linux/err.h>
+ #include <linux/rational.h>
+ #include <linux/bitfield.h>
+ #include <dt-bindings/clock/nuvoton,npcm7xx-clock.h>
+
 
 struct npcm7xx_clk_pll {
 	struct clk_hw	hw;
@@ -27,6 +36,9 @@ struct npcm7xx_clk_pll {
 
 #define to_npcm7xx_clk_pll(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct npcm7xx_clk_pll, hw)
 
+static struct clk_hw *npcm7xx_clk_register_pll(void __iomem *pllcon,
+	const char *name, const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags);
+
 #define PLLCON_LOKI	BIT(31)
 #define PLLCON_LOKS	BIT(30)
 #define PLLCON_FBDV	GENMASK(27, 16)
@@ -44,7 +56,8 @@ static unsigned long npcm7xx_clk_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	u64 ret;
 
 	if (parent_rate == 0) {
-		pr_err("%s: parent rate is zero", __func__);
+		pr_err("%s: parent rate is zero. reg=%x\n", __func__,
+			(u32)(pll->pllcon));
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -61,13 +74,12 @@ static unsigned long npcm7xx_clk_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static const struct clk_ops npcm7xx_clk_pll_ops = {
+const struct clk_ops npcm7xx_clk_pll_ops = {
 	.recalc_rate = npcm7xx_clk_pll_recalc_rate,
 };
 
-static struct clk_hw *
-npcm7xx_clk_register_pll(void __iomem *pllcon, const char *name,
-			 const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags)
+static struct clk_hw *npcm7xx_clk_register_pll(void __iomem *pllcon,
+		const char *name, const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	struct npcm7xx_clk_pll *pll;
 	struct clk_init_data init;
@@ -78,7 +90,8 @@ npcm7xx_clk_register_pll(void __iomem *pllcon, const char *name,
 	if (!pll)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	pr_debug("%s reg, name=%s, p=%s\n", __func__, name, parent_name);
+	pr_debug("%s reg, reg=0x%x, name=%s, p=%s\n",
+		__func__, (unsigned int)pllcon, name, parent_name);
 
 	init.name = name;
 	init.ops = &npcm7xx_clk_pll_ops;
@@ -544,9 +557,11 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct device_node *clk_np)
 	void __iomem *clk_base;
 	struct resource res;
 	struct clk_hw *hw;
+	struct clk *clk;
 	int ret;
 	int i;
 
+	clk_base = NULL;
 	ret = of_address_to_resource(clk_np, 0, &res);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("%s: failed to get resource, ret %d\n", clk_np->name,
@@ -560,14 +575,44 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct device_node *clk_np)
 
 	npcm7xx_clk_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*npcm7xx_clk_data->hws) *
 		NPCM7XX_NUM_CLOCKS + sizeof(npcm7xx_clk_data), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!npcm7xx_clk_data)
+
+	npcm7xx_clk_data->num = 0;
+
+	if (!npcm7xx_clk_data->hws) {
+		pr_err("Can't alloc npcm7xx_clk_data\n");
 		goto npcm7xx_init_np_err;
+	}
 
 	npcm7xx_clk_data->num = NPCM7XX_NUM_CLOCKS;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < NPCM7XX_NUM_CLOCKS; i++)
 		npcm7xx_clk_data->hws[i] = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 
+	/* Read fixed clocks. These 3 clocks must be defined in DT */
+	clk = of_clk_get_by_name(clk_np, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_REFCLK);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+		pr_err("failed to find external REFCLK on device tree, err=%ld\n",
+			PTR_ERR(clk));
+		clk_put(clk);
+		goto npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt;
+	}
+
+	clk = of_clk_get_by_name(clk_np, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_SYSBYPCK);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+		pr_err("failed to find external SYSBYPCK on device tree, err=%ld\n",
+			PTR_ERR(clk));
+		clk_put(clk);
+		goto npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt;
+	}
+
+	clk = of_clk_get_by_name(clk_np, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_MCBYPCK);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+		pr_err("failed to find external MCBYPCK on device tree, err=%ld\n",
+			PTR_ERR(clk));
+		clk_put(clk);
+		goto npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt;
+	}
+
 	/* Register plls */
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(npcm7xx_plls); i++) {
 		const struct npcm7xx_clk_pll_data *pll_data = &npcm7xx_plls[i];
@@ -584,16 +629,16 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct device_node *clk_np)
 	}
 
 	/* Register fixed dividers */
-	hw = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL1_DIV2,
+	clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL1_DIV2,
 			NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL1, 0, 1, 2);
-	if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
+	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
 		pr_err("npcm7xx_clk: Can't register fixed div\n");
 		goto npcm7xx_init_fail;
 	}
 
-	hw = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL2_DIV2,
+	clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL2_DIV2,
 			NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL2, 0, 1, 2);
-	if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
+	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
 		pr_err("npcm7xx_clk: Can't register div2\n");
 		goto npcm7xx_init_fail;
 	}
@@ -646,11 +691,17 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct device_node *clk_np)
 
 	return;
 
+npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt:
+	pr_err("see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/");
+	pr_err("nuvoton,npcm750-clk.txt  for details\n");
 npcm7xx_init_fail:
-	kfree(npcm7xx_clk_data->hws);
+	if (npcm7xx_clk_data->num)
+		kfree(npcm7xx_clk_data->hws);
 npcm7xx_init_np_err:
-	iounmap(clk_base);
+	if (clk_base != NULL)
+		iounmap(clk_base);
 npcm7xx_init_error:
 	of_node_put(clk_np);
+	pr_err("clk setup fail\n");
 }
 CLK_OF_DECLARE(npcm7xx_clk_init, "nuvoton,npcm750-clk", npcm7xx_clk_init);
-- 
2.14.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] clk: npcm7xx: get fixed clocks from DT
  2018-11-11 13:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] clk: npcm7xx: get fixed clocks from DT tali.perry1
@ 2018-11-30  0:23   ` Stephen Boyd
  2018-12-04 15:49     ` Tali Perry
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2018-11-30  0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: avifishman70, brendanhiggins, linux, mark.rutland, mturquette,
	raltherr, robh+dt, sboyd, tali.perry1, tmaimon77
  Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, openbmc, linux-clk,
	Tali Perry, Wei Yongjun

Quoting tali.perry1@gmail.com (2018-11-11 05:47:12)
> From: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>
> 
> Nuvoton NPCM7XX Clock Controller
> fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name error handling.
>     Also update error messages to be more informative.
>     
>     In case clk_base allocation is erronoeous the return value is null.
>     Also fix handling of of_clk_get_by_name returns an error. 
>     Print a better error message pointing to the dt-binding documention.
> 
> This patch is re-submitted since it was already pushed to main 
> (just the diff, without the full driver which is already in 
> master branch.)
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> 

I don't know what's going on with this patch. Is it something new? Can
you break it up into logical changes and submit them with proper commit
text? The signoff chain is also odd. Can you follow
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?

> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c b/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c
> index 740af90a9508..91a937720f4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c
> @@ -7,17 +7,26 @@
>   * Copyright (C) 2018 Nuvoton Technologies tali.perry@nuvoton.com
>   */
>  
> -#include <linux/module.h>
> -#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> -#include <linux/io.h>
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> -#include <linux/of_address.h>
> -#include <linux/slab.h>
> -#include <linux/err.h>
> -#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> -
> -#include <dt-bindings/clock/nuvoton,npcm7xx-clock.h>
> +
> +
> +
> + #include <linux/module.h>
> + #include <linux/clk.h>
> + #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> + #include <linux/device.h>
> + #include <linux/io.h>
> + #include <linux/kernel.h>
> + #include <linux/of.h>
> + #include <linux/of_device.h>
> + #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> + #include <linux/of_address.h>
> + #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> + #include <linux/slab.h>
> + #include <linux/err.h>
> + #include <linux/rational.h>
> + #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/nuvoton,npcm7xx-clock.h>

Is any of this hunk necessary or relevant to the subject of this patch?

> +
>  
>  struct npcm7xx_clk_pll {
> @@ -44,7 +56,8 @@ static unsigned long npcm7xx_clk_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>         u64 ret;
>  
>         if (parent_rate == 0) {
> -               pr_err("%s: parent rate is zero", __func__);
> +               pr_err("%s: parent rate is zero. reg=%x\n", __func__,
> +                       (u32)(pll->pllcon));

Maybe you should print clk name instead of register?

>                 return 0;
>         }
>  
> @@ -61,13 +74,12 @@ static unsigned long npcm7xx_clk_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>         return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static const struct clk_ops npcm7xx_clk_pll_ops = {
> +const struct clk_ops npcm7xx_clk_pll_ops = {

Why?

>         .recalc_rate = npcm7xx_clk_pll_recalc_rate,
>  };
>  
> -static struct clk_hw *
> -npcm7xx_clk_register_pll(void __iomem *pllcon, const char *name,
> -                        const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags)
> +static struct clk_hw *npcm7xx_clk_register_pll(void __iomem *pllcon,
> +               const char *name, const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags)
>  {
>         struct npcm7xx_clk_pll *pll;
>         struct clk_init_data init;
> @@ -78,7 +90,8 @@ npcm7xx_clk_register_pll(void __iomem *pllcon, const char *name,
>         if (!pll)
>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
> -       pr_debug("%s reg, name=%s, p=%s\n", __func__, name, parent_name);
> +       pr_debug("%s reg, reg=0x%x, name=%s, p=%s\n",
> +               __func__, (unsigned int)pllcon, name, parent_name);

What's going on here? Why cast?

>  
>         init.name = name;
>         init.ops = &npcm7xx_clk_pll_ops;
> @@ -544,9 +557,11 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct device_node *clk_np)
>         void __iomem *clk_base;
>         struct resource res;
>         struct clk_hw *hw;
> +       struct clk *clk;
>         int ret;
>         int i;
>  
> +       clk_base = NULL;

Why?

>         ret = of_address_to_resource(clk_np, 0, &res);
>         if (ret) {
>                 pr_err("%s: failed to get resource, ret %d\n", clk_np->name,
> @@ -560,14 +575,44 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct device_node *clk_np)
>  
>         npcm7xx_clk_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*npcm7xx_clk_data->hws) *
>                 NPCM7XX_NUM_CLOCKS + sizeof(npcm7xx_clk_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> -       if (!npcm7xx_clk_data)
> +
> +       npcm7xx_clk_data->num = 0;

kzalloc already does that initialization to 0 for you.

> +
> +       if (!npcm7xx_clk_data->hws) {
> +               pr_err("Can't alloc npcm7xx_clk_data\n");

We don't need allocation error messages.

>                 goto npcm7xx_init_np_err;
> +       }
>  
>         npcm7xx_clk_data->num = NPCM7XX_NUM_CLOCKS;
>  
>         for (i = 0; i < NPCM7XX_NUM_CLOCKS; i++)
>                 npcm7xx_clk_data->hws[i] = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>  
> +       /* Read fixed clocks. These 3 clocks must be defined in DT */
> +       clk = of_clk_get_by_name(clk_np, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_REFCLK);
> +       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> +               pr_err("failed to find external REFCLK on device tree, err=%ld\n",
> +                       PTR_ERR(clk));
> +               clk_put(clk);
> +               goto npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt;
> +       }
> +
> +       clk = of_clk_get_by_name(clk_np, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_SYSBYPCK);
> +       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> +               pr_err("failed to find external SYSBYPCK on device tree, err=%ld\n",
> +                       PTR_ERR(clk));
> +               clk_put(clk);
> +               goto npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt;
> +       }
> +
> +       clk = of_clk_get_by_name(clk_np, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_MCBYPCK);
> +       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> +               pr_err("failed to find external MCBYPCK on device tree, err=%ld\n",
> +                       PTR_ERR(clk));
> +               clk_put(clk);
> +               goto npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt;
> +       }

I assume the DTS is not shipped?

> +
>         /* Register plls */
>         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(npcm7xx_plls); i++) {
>                 const struct npcm7xx_clk_pll_data *pll_data = &npcm7xx_plls[i];
> @@ -584,16 +629,16 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct device_node *clk_np)
>         }
>  
>         /* Register fixed dividers */
> -       hw = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL1_DIV2,
> +       clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL1_DIV2,

This is going backwards. Please use clk_hw APIs.

>                         NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL1, 0, 1, 2);
> -       if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
> +       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>                 pr_err("npcm7xx_clk: Can't register fixed div\n");
>                 goto npcm7xx_init_fail;
>         }
>  
> -       hw = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL2_DIV2,
> +       clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL2_DIV2,
>                         NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL2, 0, 1, 2);
> -       if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
> +       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>                 pr_err("npcm7xx_clk: Can't register div2\n");
>                 goto npcm7xx_init_fail;
>         }
> @@ -646,11 +691,17 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct device_node *clk_np)
>  
>         return;
>  
> +npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt:
> +       pr_err("see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/");
> +       pr_err("nuvoton,npcm750-clk.txt  for details\n");
>  npcm7xx_init_fail:
> -       kfree(npcm7xx_clk_data->hws);
> +       if (npcm7xx_clk_data->num)
> +               kfree(npcm7xx_clk_data->hws);
>  npcm7xx_init_np_err:
> -       iounmap(clk_base);
> +       if (clk_base != NULL)
> +               iounmap(clk_base);
>  npcm7xx_init_error:
>         of_node_put(clk_np);
> +       pr_err("clk setup fail\n");

Is this hunk of changes related to the subject of this patch? I don't
think it is, so it just leads to more confusion.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] clk: npcm7xx: get fixed clocks from DT
  2018-11-30  0:23   ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2018-12-04 15:49     ` Tali Perry
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tali Perry @ 2018-12-04 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd
  Cc: avifishman70, Brendan Higgins, linux, Mark Rutland,
	Michael Turquette, raltherr, Rob Herring, sboyd, Tomer Maimon,
	devicetree, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel,
	OpenBMC Maillist, linux-clk, Wei Yongjun

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9987 bytes --]

Hi Stephan,

Thanks for all the comments!

This patch include one change so it's one commit.
This clock module includes 4 PLLs and then a tree of muxes and dividers.
All muxes and dividers are preset before Linux boots. The presetting can
change according to the board.
Linux drivers need to know what the frequencies are, but they can not
change it,
so this whole driver is intended as read only mechanism for clocks.

On the first version which was up-streamed the PLLs input clk value was
defined inside the driver.

After the review I was asked that the fixed clock will be on the DT. This
is this fix.


This patch was submitted, but not pushed to Linux:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1610776.html

Meanwhile first version was pushed to the Kernel, So recreate a patch that
is relative between the two patches.


More comments inline..



On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:23 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:

> Quoting tali.perry1@gmail.com (2018-11-11 05:47:12)
> > From: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>
> >
> > Nuvoton NPCM7XX Clock Controller
> > fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name error handling.
> >     Also update error messages to be more informative.
> >
> >     In case clk_base allocation is erronoeous the return value is null.
> >     Also fix handling of of_clk_get_by_name returns an error.
> >     Print a better error message pointing to the dt-binding documention.
> >
> > This patch is re-submitted since it was already pushed to main
> > (just the diff, without the full driver which is already in
> > master branch.)
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> >
>
> I don't know what's going on with this patch. Is it something new? Can
> you break it up into logical changes and submit them with proper commit
> text? The signoff chain is also odd. Can you follow
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c | 99
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c b/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c
> > index 740af90a9508..91a937720f4e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c
> > @@ -7,17 +7,26 @@
> >   * Copyright (C) 2018 Nuvoton Technologies tali.perry@nuvoton.com
> >   */
> >
> > -#include <linux/module.h>
> > -#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> > -#include <linux/io.h>
> > -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > -#include <linux/of.h>
> > -#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > -#include <linux/slab.h>
> > -#include <linux/err.h>
> > -#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > -
> > -#include <dt-bindings/clock/nuvoton,npcm7xx-clock.h>
> > +
> > +
> > +
> > + #include <linux/module.h>
> > + #include <linux/clk.h>
> > + #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> > + #include <linux/device.h>
> > + #include <linux/io.h>
> > + #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > + #include <linux/of.h>
> > + #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > + #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > + #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > + #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > + #include <linux/slab.h>
> > + #include <linux/err.h>
> > + #include <linux/rational.h>
> > + #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/nuvoton,npcm7xx-clock.h>
>
> Is any of this hunk necessary or relevant to the subject of this patch?
>
> > +
> >
> >  struct npcm7xx_clk_pll {
> > @@ -44,7 +56,8 @@ static unsigned long
> npcm7xx_clk_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> >         u64 ret;
> >
> >         if (parent_rate == 0) {
> > -               pr_err("%s: parent rate is zero", __func__);
> > +               pr_err("%s: parent rate is zero. reg=%x\n", __func__,
> > +                       (u32)(pll->pllcon));
>
> Maybe you should print clk name instead of register?
>

Tali: There are only 4 pllcon registers. I don't mind if it's the address
and not the name.

>
> >                 return 0;
> >         }
> >
> > @@ -61,13 +74,12 @@ static unsigned long
> npcm7xx_clk_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > -static const struct clk_ops npcm7xx_clk_pll_ops = {
> > +const struct clk_ops npcm7xx_clk_pll_ops = {
>
> Why?
>

Tali: I will return the static.

>
> >         .recalc_rate = npcm7xx_clk_pll_recalc_rate,
> >  };
> >
> > -static struct clk_hw *
> > -npcm7xx_clk_register_pll(void __iomem *pllcon, const char *name,
> > -                        const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags)
> > +static struct clk_hw *npcm7xx_clk_register_pll(void __iomem *pllcon,
> > +               const char *name, const char *parent_name, unsigned long
> flags)
> >  {
> >         struct npcm7xx_clk_pll *pll;
> >         struct clk_init_data init;
> > @@ -78,7 +90,8 @@ npcm7xx_clk_register_pll(void __iomem *pllcon, const
> char *name,
> >         if (!pll)
> >                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > -       pr_debug("%s reg, name=%s, p=%s\n", __func__, name, parent_name);
> > +       pr_debug("%s reg, reg=0x%x, name=%s, p=%s\n",
> > +               __func__, (unsigned int)pllcon, name, parent_name);
>
> What's going on here? Why cast?
>
Tali: I will remove this print all together.

>
> >
> >         init.name = name;
> >         init.ops = &npcm7xx_clk_pll_ops;
> > @@ -544,9 +557,11 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct
> device_node *clk_np)
> >         void __iomem *clk_base;
> >         struct resource res;
> >         struct clk_hw *hw;
> > +       struct clk *clk;
> >         int ret;
> >         int i;
> >
> > +       clk_base = NULL;
>
> Why?
>

Tali: to init it. If DT is badly defined the value will remain NULL.


>
> >         ret = of_address_to_resource(clk_np, 0, &res);
> >         if (ret) {
> >                 pr_err("%s: failed to get resource, ret %d\n",
> clk_np->name,
> > @@ -560,14 +575,44 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct
> device_node *clk_np)
> >
> >         npcm7xx_clk_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*npcm7xx_clk_data->hws) *
> >                 NPCM7XX_NUM_CLOCKS + sizeof(npcm7xx_clk_data),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> > -       if (!npcm7xx_clk_data)
> > +
> > +       npcm7xx_clk_data->num = 0;
>
> kzalloc already does that initialization to 0 for you.
>
> > +
> > +       if (!npcm7xx_clk_data->hws) {
> > +               pr_err("Can't alloc npcm7xx_clk_data\n");
>
> We don't need allocation error messages.
>
> >                 goto npcm7xx_init_np_err;
> > +       }
> >
> >         npcm7xx_clk_data->num = NPCM7XX_NUM_CLOCKS;
> >
> >         for (i = 0; i < NPCM7XX_NUM_CLOCKS; i++)
> >                 npcm7xx_clk_data->hws[i] = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> >
> > +       /* Read fixed clocks. These 3 clocks must be defined in DT */
> > +       clk = of_clk_get_by_name(clk_np, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_REFCLK);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> > +               pr_err("failed to find external REFCLK on device tree,
> err=%ld\n",
> > +                       PTR_ERR(clk));
> > +               clk_put(clk);
> > +               goto npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       clk = of_clk_get_by_name(clk_np, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_SYSBYPCK);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> > +               pr_err("failed to find external SYSBYPCK on device tree,
> err=%ld\n",
> > +                       PTR_ERR(clk));
> > +               clk_put(clk);
> > +               goto npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       clk = of_clk_get_by_name(clk_np, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_MCBYPCK);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> > +               pr_err("failed to find external MCBYPCK on device tree,
> err=%ld\n",
> > +                       PTR_ERR(clk));
> > +               clk_put(clk);
> > +               goto npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt;
> > +       }
>
> I assume the DTS is not shipped?
>

Tali: DTS for npcm is shipped in a separate patchset.

>
> > +
> >         /* Register plls */
> >         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(npcm7xx_plls); i++) {
> >                 const struct npcm7xx_clk_pll_data *pll_data =
> &npcm7xx_plls[i];
> > @@ -584,16 +629,16 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct
> device_node *clk_np)
> >         }
> >
> >         /* Register fixed dividers */
> > -       hw = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL1_DIV2,
> > +       clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL1_DIV2,
>
> This is going backwards. Please use clk_hw APIs.
>
Tali: Will fix.

>
> >                         NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL1, 0, 1, 2);
> > -       if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
> > +       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> >                 pr_err("npcm7xx_clk: Can't register fixed div\n");
> >                 goto npcm7xx_init_fail;
> >         }
> >
> > -       hw = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL2_DIV2,
> > +       clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL2_DIV2,
> >                         NPCM7XX_CLK_S_PLL2, 0, 1, 2);
> > -       if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
> > +       if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> >                 pr_err("npcm7xx_clk: Can't register div2\n");
> >                 goto npcm7xx_init_fail;
> >         }
> > @@ -646,11 +691,17 @@ static void __init npcm7xx_clk_init(struct
> device_node *clk_np)
> >
> >         return;
> >
> > +npcm7xx_init_fail_no_clk_on_dt:
> > +       pr_err("see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/");
> > +       pr_err("nuvoton,npcm750-clk.txt  for details\n");
> >  npcm7xx_init_fail:
> > -       kfree(npcm7xx_clk_data->hws);
> > +       if (npcm7xx_clk_data->num)
> > +               kfree(npcm7xx_clk_data->hws);
> >  npcm7xx_init_np_err:
> > -       iounmap(clk_base);
> > +       if (clk_base != NULL)
> > +               iounmap(clk_base);
> >  npcm7xx_init_error:
> >         of_node_put(clk_np);
> > +       pr_err("clk setup fail\n");
>
> Is this hunk of changes related to the subject of this patch? I don't
> think it is, so it just leads to more confusion.
>

Tali: I added a goto option for the case that the DTS doesn't have the
reference clocks this module needs.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 16750 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 0/1] clk: npcm7xx: fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name
@ 2018-07-17 12:47 Tali Perry
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tali Perry @ 2018-07-17 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sboyd, brendanhiggins, robh+dt, mark.rutland, linux, weiyongjunl,
	avifishman70, tmaimon77, raltherr
  Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, openbmc, Tali Perry,
	Wei Yongjun

Nuvoton NPCM7XX Clock Controller
fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name error handling.
    Also update error messages to be more informative.
    
    In case clk_base allocation is erronoeous the return value is null.
    Also fix handling of of_clk_get_by_name returns an error. 
    Print a better error message pointing to the dt-binding documention.

This patch is re-submitted since it was already pushed to main 
(just the diff, without the full driver which is already in 
master branch.)


Signed-off-by: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

---

Tali Perry (1):
  clk: npcm7xx: get fixed clocks from DT

 drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 0/1] clk: npcm7xx: fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name
@ 2018-07-17 11:31 Tali Perry
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tali Perry @ 2018-07-17 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sboyd, brendanhiggins, robh+dt, mark.rutland, linux, weiyongjunl,
	avifishman70, tmaimon77, raltherr
  Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, openbmc, Tali Perry,
	Wei Yongjun

Nuvoton NPCM7XX Clock Controller
fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name error handling.
    Also update error messages to be more informative.
    
    In case clk_base allocation is erronoeous the return value is null.
    Also fix handling of of_clk_get_by_name returns an error. 
    Print a better error message pointing to the dt-binding documention.

This patch is re-submitted since it was already pushed to main 
(just the diff, without the full driver which is already in 
master branch.)


Signed-off-by: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

---

Tali Perry (1):
  clk: npcm7xx: get fixed clocks from DT

 drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 0/1] clk: npcm7xx: fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name
@ 2018-07-16 10:10 Tali Perry
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tali Perry @ 2018-07-16 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sboyd, brendanhiggins, robh+dt, mark.rutland, linux, weiyongjunl,
	avifishman70, tmaimon77, raltherr
  Cc: devicetree, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, openbmc, Tali Perry,
	Wei Yongjun

Nuvoton NPCM7XX Clock Controller
fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name error handling.
    Also update error messages to be more informative.
    
    In case clk_base allocation is erronoeous the return value is null.
    Also fix handling of of_clk_get_by_name returns an error. 
    Print a better error message pointing to the dt-binding documention.

This patch is re-submitted since it was already pushed to main 
(just the diff, without the full driver which is already in 
master branch.)


Signed-off-by: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

---

Tali Perry (1):
  clk: npcm7xx: get fixed clocks from DT

 drivers/clk/clk-npcm7xx.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-04 15:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-11 13:47 [PATCH v1 0/1] clk: npcm7xx: fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name tali.perry1
2018-11-11 13:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] clk: npcm7xx: get fixed clocks from DT tali.perry1
2018-11-30  0:23   ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-04 15:49     ` Tali Perry
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-17 12:47 [PATCH v1 0/1] clk: npcm7xx: fix base address and of_clk_get_by_name Tali Perry
2018-07-17 11:31 Tali Perry
2018-07-16 10:10 Tali Perry

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).