openbmc.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Winiarska, Iwona" <iwona.winiarska@intel.com>
To: "zweiss@equinix.com" <zweiss@equinix.com>
Cc: "linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com" <jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>,
	"mchehab@kernel.org" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com"
	<pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"linux@roeck-us.net" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jdelvare@suse.com" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com"
	<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"andrew@aj.id.au" <andrew@aj.id.au>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"yazen.ghannam@amd.com" <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] peci: Add device detection
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:55:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47440a8329ce06c41ca9746db42cb1d66154ea46.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210727174900.GR8018@packtop>

On Tue, 2021-07-27 at 17:49 +0000, Zev Weiss wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:04:41PM CDT, Iwona Winiarska wrote:
> > Since PECI devices are discoverable, we can dynamically detect devices
> > that are actually available in the system.
> > 
> > This change complements the earlier implementation by rescanning PECI
> > bus to detect available devices. For this purpose, it also introduces the
> > minimal API for PECI requests.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/peci/Makefile   |   2 +-
> > drivers/peci/core.c     |  13 ++++-
> > drivers/peci/device.c   | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/peci/internal.h |  15 ++++++
> > drivers/peci/request.c  |  74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/peci/sysfs.c    |  34 ++++++++++++
> > 6 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/peci/device.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/peci/request.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/Makefile b/drivers/peci/Makefile
> > index 621a993e306a..917f689e147a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/peci/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/Makefile
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > 
> > # Core functionality
> > -peci-y := core.o sysfs.o
> > +peci-y := core.o request.o device.o sysfs.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PECI) += peci.o
> > 
> > # Hardware specific bus drivers
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/core.c b/drivers/peci/core.c
> > index 0ad00110459d..ae7a9572cdf3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/peci/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/core.c
> > @@ -31,7 +31,15 @@ struct device_type peci_controller_type = {
> > 
> > int peci_controller_scan_devices(struct peci_controller *controller)
> > {
> > -       /* Just a stub, no support for actual devices yet */
> > +       int ret;
> > +       u8 addr;
> > +
> > +       for (addr = PECI_BASE_ADDR; addr < PECI_BASE_ADDR +
> > PECI_DEVICE_NUM_MAX; addr++) {
> > +               ret = peci_device_create(controller, addr);
> > +               if (ret)
> > +                       return ret;
> > +       }
> > +
> >         return 0;
> > }
> > 
> > @@ -106,7 +114,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(peci_controller_add, PECI);
> > 
> > static int _unregister(struct device *dev, void *dummy)
> > {
> > -       /* Just a stub, no support for actual devices yet */
> > +       peci_device_destroy(to_peci_device(dev));
> > +
> >         return 0;
> > }
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/device.c b/drivers/peci/device.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..1124862211e2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/device.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +// Copyright (c) 2018-2021 Intel Corporation
> > +
> > +#include <linux/peci.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +#include "internal.h"
> > +
> > +static int peci_detect(struct peci_controller *controller, u8 addr)
> > +{
> > +       struct peci_request *req;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       req = peci_request_alloc(NULL, 0, 0);
> > +       if (!req)
> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> 
> Might be worth a brief comment here noting that an empty request happens
> to be the format of a PECI ping command (and/or change the name of the
> function to peci_ping()).

I'll add a comment:
"We are using PECI Ping command to detect presence of PECI devices."

> 
> > +       mutex_lock(&controller->bus_lock);
> > +       ret = controller->xfer(controller, addr, req);
> > +       mutex_unlock(&controller->bus_lock);
> > +
> > +       peci_request_free(req);
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool peci_addr_valid(u8 addr)
> > +{
> > +       return addr >= PECI_BASE_ADDR && addr < PECI_BASE_ADDR +
> > PECI_DEVICE_NUM_MAX;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int peci_dev_exists(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > +{
> > +       struct peci_device *device = to_peci_device(dev);
> > +       u8 *addr = data;
> > +
> > +       if (device->addr == *addr)
> > +               return -EBUSY;
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int peci_device_create(struct peci_controller *controller, u8 addr)
> > +{
> > +       struct peci_device *device;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       if (WARN_ON(!peci_addr_valid(addr)))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> 
> Wondering about the necessity of this check (and the peci_addr_valid()
> function) -- as of the end of this patch series, there's only one caller
> of peci_device_create(), and it's peci_controller_scan_devices() looping
> from PECI_BASE_ADDR to PECI_BASE_ADDR + PECI_DEVICE_NUM_MAX, so
> checking that the address is in that range seems a bit redundant.  Do we
> anticipate that we might gain additional callers in the future that
> could run a non-zero risk of passing a bad address?

It's just a sanity check to avoid any surprises if the code changes in the
future.

> 
> > +
> > +       /* Check if we have already detected this device before. */
> > +       ret = device_for_each_child(&controller->dev, &addr,
> > peci_dev_exists);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               return 0;
> > +
> > +       ret = peci_detect(controller, addr);
> > +       if (ret) {
> > +               /*
> > +                * Device not present or host state doesn't allow successful
> > +                * detection at this time.
> > +                */
> > +               if (ret == -EIO || ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> > +                       return 0;
> 
> Do we really want to be ignoring EIO here?  From a look at
> aspeed_peci_xfer(), it looks like the only path that would produce that
> is the non-timeout, non-CMD_DONE case, which I guess happens on
> contention or FCS errors and such.  Should we maybe have some automatic
> (limited) retry loop for cases like those?

Yes, we want to ignore EIO here.
It may be returned when we get "Bad Write FCS", after we try to ping non-
existing PECI device.

> 
> > +
> > +               return ret;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       device = kzalloc(sizeof(*device), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       if (!device)
> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +       device->controller = controller;
> > +       device->addr = addr;
> > +       device->dev.parent = &device->controller->dev;
> > +       device->dev.bus = &peci_bus_type;
> > +       device->dev.type = &peci_device_type;
> > +
> > +       ret = dev_set_name(&device->dev, "%d-%02x", controller->id, device-
> > >addr);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               goto err_free;
> > +
> > +       ret = device_register(&device->dev);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               goto err_put;
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +
> > +err_put:
> > +       put_device(&device->dev);
> > +err_free:
> > +       kfree(device);
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void peci_device_destroy(struct peci_device *device)
> > +{
> > +       device_unregister(&device->dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void peci_device_release(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +       struct peci_device *device = to_peci_device(dev);
> > +
> > +       kfree(device);
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct device_type peci_device_type = {
> > +       .groups         = peci_device_groups,
> > +       .release        = peci_device_release,
> > +};
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/internal.h b/drivers/peci/internal.h
> > index 80c61bcdfc6b..6b139adaf6b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/peci/internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/internal.h
> > @@ -9,6 +9,21 @@
> > 
> > struct peci_controller;
> > struct attribute_group;
> > +struct peci_device;
> > +struct peci_request;
> > +
> > +/* PECI CPU address range 0x30-0x37 */
> > +#define PECI_BASE_ADDR         0x30
> > +#define PECI_DEVICE_NUM_MAX            8
> > +
> > +struct peci_request *peci_request_alloc(struct peci_device *device, u8
> > tx_len, u8 rx_len);
> > +void peci_request_free(struct peci_request *req);
> > +
> > +extern struct device_type peci_device_type;
> > +extern const struct attribute_group *peci_device_groups[];
> > +
> > +int peci_device_create(struct peci_controller *controller, u8 addr);
> > +void peci_device_destroy(struct peci_device *device);
> > 
> > extern struct bus_type peci_bus_type;
> > extern const struct attribute_group *peci_bus_groups[];
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/request.c b/drivers/peci/request.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..78cee51dfae1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/request.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +// Copyright (c) 2021 Intel Corporation
> > +
> > +#include <linux/export.h>
> > +#include <linux/peci.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> > +#include "internal.h"
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * peci_request_alloc() - allocate &struct peci_request with buffers with
> > given lengths
> > + * @device: PECI device to which request is going to be sent
> > + * @tx_len: requested TX buffer length
> > + * @rx_len: requested RX buffer length
> > + *
> > + * Return: A pointer to a newly allocated &struct peci_request on success
> > or NULL otherwise.
> > + */
> > +struct peci_request *peci_request_alloc(struct peci_device *device, u8
> > tx_len, u8 rx_len)
> > +{
> > +       struct peci_request *req;
> > +       u8 *tx_buf, *rx_buf;
> > +
> > +       req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       if (!req)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       req->device = device;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * PECI controllers that we are using now don't support DMA, this
> > +        * should be converted to DMA API once support for controllers that
> > do
> > +        * allow it is added to avoid an extra copy.
> > +        */
> > +       if (tx_len) {
> > +               tx_buf = kzalloc(tx_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +               if (!tx_buf)
> > +                       goto err_free_req;
> > +
> > +               req->tx.buf = tx_buf;
> > +               req->tx.len = tx_len;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       if (rx_len) {
> > +               rx_buf = kzalloc(rx_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +               if (!rx_buf)
> > +                       goto err_free_tx;
> > +
> > +               req->rx.buf = rx_buf;
> > +               req->rx.len = rx_len;
> > +       }
> > +
> 
> As long as we're punting on DMA support, could we do the whole thing in
> a single allocation instead of three?  It'd add some pointer arithmetic,
> but would also simplify the error-handling/deallocation paths a bit.
> 
> Or, given that the one controller we're currently supporting has a
> hardware limit of 32 bytes per transfer anyway, maybe just inline
> fixed-size rx/tx buffers into struct peci_request and have callers keep
> them on the stack instead of kmalloc()-ing them?

I disagree on error handling (it's not complicated) - however, one argument for
doing a single alloc (or moving the buffers as fixed-size arrays inside struct
peci_request) is that single kzalloc is going to be faster than 3. But I don't
expect it to show up on any perf profiles for now (since peci-wire interface is
not a speed demon).

I wanted to avoid defining max size for TX and RX in peci-core.
Do you have a strong opinion against multiple alloc? If yes, I can go with
fixed-size arrays inside struct peci_request.

Thanks
-Iwona

> 
> > +       return req;
> > +
> > +err_free_tx:
> > +       kfree(req->tx.buf);
> > +err_free_req:
> > +       kfree(req);
> > +
> > +       return NULL;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(peci_request_alloc, PECI);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * peci_request_free() - free peci_request
> > + * @req: the PECI request to be freed
> > + */
> > +void peci_request_free(struct peci_request *req)
> > +{
> > +       kfree(req->rx.buf);
> > +       kfree(req->tx.buf);
> > +       kfree(req);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(peci_request_free, PECI);
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/sysfs.c b/drivers/peci/sysfs.c
> > index 36c5e2a18a92..db9ef05776e3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/peci/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/sysfs.c
> > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > // Copyright (c) 2021 Intel Corporation
> > 
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/peci.h>
> > 
> > #include "internal.h"
> > @@ -46,3 +48,35 @@ const struct attribute_group *peci_bus_groups[] = {
> >         &peci_bus_group,
> >         NULL
> > };
> > +
> > +static ssize_t remove_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute
> > *attr,
> > +                           const char *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > +       struct peci_device *device = to_peci_device(dev);
> > +       bool res;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       ret = kstrtobool(buf, &res);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               return ret;
> > +
> > +       if (res && device_remove_file_self(dev, attr))
> > +               peci_device_destroy(device);
> > +
> > +       return count;
> > +}
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP(remove, 0200, NULL, remove_store);
> > +
> > +static struct attribute *peci_device_attrs[] = {
> > +       &dev_attr_remove.attr,
> > +       NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct attribute_group peci_device_group = {
> > +       .attrs = peci_device_attrs,
> > +};
> > +
> > +const struct attribute_group *peci_device_groups[] = {
> > +       &peci_device_group,
> > +       NULL
> > +};
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-29 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-12 22:04 [PATCH 00/14] Introduce PECI subsystem Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 01/14] x86/cpu: Move intel-family to arch-independent headers Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-14 16:54   ` Williams, Dan J
2021-07-15 16:47     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-15 18:13       ` Dan Williams
2021-07-15 18:29         ` Luck, Tony
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 02/14] x86/cpu: Extract cpuid helpers to arch-independent Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-14 16:58   ` Williams, Dan J
2021-07-15 16:51     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-15 16:58       ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 03/14] dt-bindings: Add generic bindings for PECI Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 04/14] dt-bindings: Add bindings for peci-aspeed Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-15 16:28   ` Rob Herring
2021-07-16 21:22     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add PECI controller nodes Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 06/14] peci: Add core infrastructure Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-14 17:19   ` Williams, Dan J
2021-07-16 21:08     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-16 21:50       ` Dan Williams
2021-07-17  6:12         ` gregkh
2021-07-17 20:54           ` Dan Williams
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 07/14] peci: Add peci-aspeed controller driver Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-13  5:02   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-07-15 16:42     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-14 17:39   ` Williams, Dan J
2021-07-16 21:17     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-27  8:49   ` Zev Weiss
2021-07-29 14:03     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-29 18:15       ` Zev Weiss
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 08/14] peci: Add device detection Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-14 21:05   ` Williams, Dan J
2021-07-16 21:20     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-27 17:49   ` Zev Weiss
2021-07-29 18:55     ` Winiarska, Iwona [this message]
2021-07-29 20:50       ` Zev Weiss
2021-07-30 20:10         ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 09/14] peci: Add support for PECI device drivers Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-27 20:10   ` Zev Weiss
2021-07-27 21:23     ` Guenter Roeck
2021-07-29 21:17     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-29 23:22       ` Zev Weiss
2021-07-30 20:13         ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 10/14] peci: Add peci-cpu driver Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-27 11:16   ` David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
2021-07-30 20:14     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-27 21:33   ` Zev Weiss
2021-07-30 21:21     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 11/14] hwmon: peci: Add cputemp driver Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-15 17:45   ` Guenter Roeck
2021-07-19 20:12     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-19 20:35       ` Guenter Roeck
2021-07-27  7:06   ` Zev Weiss
2021-07-30 21:51     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-30 22:04       ` Guenter Roeck
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 12/14] hwmon: peci: Add dimmtemp driver Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-15 17:56   ` Guenter Roeck
2021-07-19 20:31     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-19 20:36       ` Guenter Roeck
2021-07-26 22:08   ` Zev Weiss
2021-07-30 22:48     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 13/14] docs: hwmon: Document PECI drivers Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-27 22:58   ` Zev Weiss
2021-07-28  0:49     ` Guenter Roeck
2021-08-02 11:39       ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-08-02 11:37     ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-08-04 17:52       ` Zev Weiss
2021-08-04 18:05         ` Guenter Roeck
2021-08-05 21:42           ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-12 22:04 ` [PATCH 14/14] docs: Add PECI documentation Iwona Winiarska
2021-07-14 16:51 ` [PATCH 00/14] Introduce PECI subsystem Williams, Dan J
2021-07-15 17:33   ` Winiarska, Iwona
2021-07-15 19:34     ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47440a8329ce06c41ca9746db42cb1d66154ea46.camel@intel.com \
    --to=iwona.winiarska@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=zweiss@equinix.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 08/14] peci: Add device detection' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).