* Question about IPMI password MAX length test in openbmc-test-automation
@ 2020-01-06 9:34 ` Tony Lee (李文富)
2020-01-07 5:45 ` Rahul Maheshwari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lee (李文富) @ 2020-01-06 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: adathatr; +Cc: openbmc
Hi Anusha,
I met an issue that "Verify Setting IPMI User With Invalid Password Length" will fail when
its user id is same as "Verify Setting IPMI User With Max Password Length".
This is because the password length 20 has been successfully set in "Verify Setting IPMI User With Max Password Length".
Therefore, the case of password_length = 21 and password_option = 20 is expected to fail but pass when their user id are the same.
I have two solutions:
1. Only verify the message that cannot use invalid password length to set password
and do not verify that user is able to run IPMI command with given username and password in this case.
2. At the end of each case, delete the user it just created to ensure that it will not affect other cases.
Which is better, or do you have other suggestions?
Thanks
Best Regards,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about IPMI password MAX length test in openbmc-test-automation
2020-01-06 9:34 ` Question about IPMI password MAX length test in openbmc-test-automation Tony Lee (李文富)
@ 2020-01-07 5:45 ` Rahul Maheshwari
[not found] ` <ab84d89c974c4067bd3f3ce848b71450@quantatw.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rahul Maheshwari @ 2020-01-07 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony Lee (李文富); +Cc: adathatr, openbmc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1149 bytes --]
Hi Tony,
I would say option 2 is better. There is no need to verify IPMI command
execution when set user password is expected to fail.
Thanks
Rahul
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:06 PM Tony Lee (李文富) <Tony.Lee@quantatw.com> wrote:
> Hi Anusha,
>
> I met an issue that "Verify Setting IPMI User With Invalid Password
> Length" will fail when
> its user id is same as "Verify Setting IPMI User With Max Password Length".
>
> This is because the password length 20 has been successfully set in
> "Verify Setting IPMI User With Max Password Length".
> Therefore, the case of password_length = 21 and password_option = 20 is
> expected to fail but pass when their user id are the same.
>
> I have two solutions:
>
> 1. Only verify the message that cannot use invalid password length to set
> password
> and do not verify that user is able to run IPMI command with given
> username and password in this case.
>
> 2. At the end of each case, delete the user it just created to ensure that
> it will not affect other cases.
>
> Which is better, or do you have other suggestions?
>
> Thanks
> Best Regards,
> Tony
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1524 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: Question about IPMI password MAX length test in openbmc-test-automation
[not found] ` <ab84d89c974c4067bd3f3ce848b71450@quantatw.com>
@ 2020-01-07 10:23 ` Anusha Dathatri
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anusha Dathatri @ 2020-01-07 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tony.Lee; +Cc: openbmc, rahulmaheshwari01
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 5625 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-07 10:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAAMkS12b+pZRPnqHH5CNib=t=x9ymM=Y=fU-Z5daqPivm239uQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-01-06 9:34 ` Question about IPMI password MAX length test in openbmc-test-automation Tony Lee (李文富)
2020-01-07 5:45 ` Rahul Maheshwari
[not found] ` <ab84d89c974c4067bd3f3ce848b71450@quantatw.com>
2020-01-07 10:23 ` Anusha Dathatri
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).