From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
To: <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: <collinsd@codeaurora.org>, <subbaram@codeaurora.org>,
<quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>,
Ashay Jaiswal <ashayj@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 4/9] spmi: pmic-arb: add support to dispatch interrupt based on IRQ status
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:30:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1627446609-9064-5-git-send-email-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1627446609-9064-1-git-send-email-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
From: Ashay Jaiswal <ashayj@codeaurora.org>
Current implementation of SPMI arbiter dispatches interrupt based on the
Arbiter's accumulator status, in some cases the accumulator status may
remain zero and the interrupt remains un-handled. Add logic to dispatch
interrupts based Arbiter's IRQ status if the accumulator status is zero.
Signed-off-by: Ashay Jaiswal <ashayj@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index c4adc06..59c445b 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -525,12 +525,18 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
u8 ee = pmic_arb->ee;
u32 status, enable;
int i, id, apid;
+ /* status based dispatch */
+ bool acc_valid = false;
+ u32 irq_status = 0;
chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
for (i = first; i <= last; ++i) {
status = readl_relaxed(
ver_ops->owner_acc_status(pmic_arb, ee, i));
+ if (status)
+ acc_valid = true;
+
while (status) {
id = ffs(status) - 1;
status &= ~BIT(id);
@@ -548,6 +554,28 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
}
}
+ /* ACC_STATUS is empty but IRQ fired check IRQ_STATUS */
+ if (!acc_valid) {
+ for (i = pmic_arb->min_apid; i <= pmic_arb->max_apid; i++) {
+ /* skip if APPS is not irq owner */
+ if (pmic_arb->apid_data[i].irq_ee != pmic_arb->ee)
+ continue;
+
+ irq_status = readl_relaxed(
+ ver_ops->irq_status(pmic_arb, i));
+ if (irq_status) {
+ enable = readl_relaxed(
+ ver_ops->acc_enable(pmic_arb, i));
+ if (enable & SPMI_PIC_ACC_ENABLE_BIT) {
+ dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev,
+ "Dispatching IRQ for apid=%d status=%x\n",
+ i, irq_status);
+ periph_interrupt(pmic_arb, i);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
}
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-28 4:30 [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 0/9] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28 4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 1/9] spmi: pmic-arb: add a print in cleanup_irq Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28 4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 2/9] spmi: pmic-arb: do not ack and clear peripheral interrupts " Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28 4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 3/9] spmi: pmic-arb: check apid against limits before calling irq handler Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28 4:30 ` Fenglin Wu [this message]
2021-07-28 4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 5/9] spmi: pmic-arb: correct duplicate APID to PPID mapping logic Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28 4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 6/9] spmi: pmic-arb: block access for invalid PMIC arbiter v5 SPMI writes Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28 4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 7/9] spmi: pmic-arb: support updating interrupt type flags Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28 4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 8/9] spmi: pmic-arb: make interrupt support optional Fenglin Wu
2021-07-28 4:30 ` [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 9/9] spmi: pmic-arb: increase SPMI transaction timeout delay Fenglin Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1627446609-9064-5-git-send-email-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com \
--cc=ashayj@codeaurora.org \
--cc=collinsd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=subbaram@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).