There is a line missing in the diagram Figure 10.18 and Figure E.7

There is a line missing in the diagram Figure 10.18 and Figure E.7

[Zhouyi Zhou]

Hi Paul and Akira,

Our Chinese version editor Yunjing Li points out that there is a line
missing in Figure E.7, there should be 7, but Figure E.7 has only 6.

Similarly, I found there should be 6 lines in Figure 10.18, but
actually it has only 5.

Although I am very glad to fix the above possible bugs, fixing them is
beyond my capability.

Thanks, Zhouyi
Reported-by: Yunjing Li
Reported-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>

Re: There is a line missing in the diagram Figure 10.18 and Figure E.7

[Akira Yokosawa]

Hi Zhouyi,

On 2024/01/15 15:20, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> Hi Paul and Akira,
> 
> Our Chinese version editor Yunjing Li points out that there is a line
> missing in Figure E.7, there should be 7, but Figure E.7 has only 6.
> 
> Similarly, I found there should be 6 lines in Figure 10.18, but
> actually it has only 5.

There is a footnote on the uppermost three traces of Figure 10.18,
which reads:

    You see only two traces? The dashed one is composed of two
    traces that differ only slightly, hence the irregular-looking
    dash pattern.

It was added by commit 27dc9fbe7605 ("datastruct: Expand on the
dash type of traces in Figure 10.19").
Wouldn't it explain your observation?

        Thanks, Akira

> 
> Although I am very glad to fix the above possible bugs, fixing them is
> beyond my capability.
> 
> Thanks, Zhouyi
> Reported-by: Yunjing Li
> Reported-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>

Re: There is a line missing in the diagram Figure 10.18 and Figure E.7

[Zhouyi Zhou]

Thank Akira's guidance

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 7:18 PM Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Zhouyi,
>
> On 2024/01/15 15:20, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> > Hi Paul and Akira,
> >
> > Our Chinese version editor Yunjing Li points out that there is a line
> > missing in Figure E.7, there should be 7, but Figure E.7 has only 6.
> >
> > Similarly, I found there should be 6 lines in Figure 10.18, but
> > actually it has only 5.
>
> There is a footnote on the uppermost three traces of Figure 10.18,
> which reads:
>
>     You see only two traces? The dashed one is composed of two
>     traces that differ only slightly, hence the irregular-looking
>     dash pattern.
>
> It was added by commit 27dc9fbe7605 ("datastruct: Expand on the
> dash type of traces in Figure 10.19").
> Wouldn't it explain your observation?
Yes, the commit explains why FIgure 10.19 has 6 traces while Figure
E.7 has 7 traces. I will reflect the information to the editor and add
a footnote to Chapter 10.

Thanks, Zhouyi
>
>         Thanks, Akira
>
> >
> > Although I am very glad to fix the above possible bugs, fixing them is
> > beyond my capability.
> >
> > Thanks, Zhouyi
> > Reported-by: Yunjing Li
> > Reported-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>