From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Kate Hsuan <hpa@redhat.com>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com, Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>, Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>, Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com>, David E Box <david.e.box@intel.com>, Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@intel.com>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>, AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>, Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@intel.com>, Maurice Ma <maurice.ma@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] platform/x86: Intel platform driver code movement Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:22:19 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <35fcce39-dc82-a656-a3f5-0a39dee39cff@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YR9/83LozDtedLKZ@smile.fi.intel.com> Hi, On 8/20/21 12:12 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 08:46:14PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> On 8/19/21 6:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> This is v4 of the Intel drivers move on in the source tree. >>> v3 has been done by Kate: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/20210819033001.20136-1-hpa@redhat.com/ >>> >>> I have taken the initial set from review-hans branch and removed Hans' SoB >>> along with Link, while leaving others' tags. >>> >>> Changelog v4: >>> - spelled fully the driver names in the commit messages >>> - fixed SCU *.ko module names >> >> Actually I checked this during review and >> CONFIG_INTEL_SCU_IPC, CONFIG_INTEL_SCU_PCI and CONFIG_INTEL_SCU_WDT >> are booleans, iow if enabled they are always builtin so the >> drivers/platform/x86/intel/scu/Makefile from v3 was correct. >> >> Since the v3 Makefile is more simple I prefer that version, >> but if you prefer to keep the v4 version that is fine too. > > I prefer mine, but we need to fix what kbuild bot complained about. Right, so I've taken a look at that and I believe that we need to change 2 things: 1. In drivers/platform/x86/intel/Makefile, use: obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SCU_IPC) += scu/ Instead of: obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SCU) += scu/ Since "config MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT" from drivers/mfd/Kconfig selects INTEL_SCU_IPC not INTEL_SCU. From a pdx86 pov thos makes on difference since CONFIG_INTEL_SCU selects INTEL_SCU_IPC too, so all pdx86 Kconfig options needing us to dive into the scu subdir also end up selecting INTEL_SCU_IPC (through INTEL_SC). 2. The "select INTEL_SCU_IPC" done by CONFIG_MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT only works if make will actually dive into the drivers/platform/x86/intel subdir which requires CONFIG_X86_PLATFORM_DRIVERS_INTEL to be set, so in the "config MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT" section of drivers/mfd/Kconfig The following change should be made: - depends on X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES + depends on X86_PLATFORM_DRIVERS_INTEL To ensure that we dive into the intel subdir of drivers/platform/x86, note that X86_PLATFORM_DRIVERS_INTEL depends on X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES (through being part of a "if X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES" Kconfig section), so we can just replace the depends on, rather then adding a new one. With those 2 things changed that error should be gone. This requires an ack from Lee to merge the drivers/mfd/Kconfig change through pdx86, so as discussed I agree that it is best to delay moving the scu bits till after 5.15-rc1 is out. > >>> - dropped extra prefix in PMC files >>> - dropped stray changes within the series >>> - removed confusing comments in Makefile and Kconfig files >>> - embedded a few of Kconfig improvements here and there (ordering, spelling) >>> - split miscellaneous group >>> - added a patch to fix kernel doc issue in SCU IPC code >> >> Thanks, I've not (re)reviewed things, but this all sounds good. >> >>> So, I have noticed the report about SCU and taking into account IPS >>> header deferred move, I think those two should be excluded from the >>> series and sent after rc1, it will also eliminate trampoline move for >>> IPS header, since we may send one patch which includes DRM changes. >>> >>> Hans, what do you think? >> >> Fixing the SCU thing will require coordination with / an >> ack from the MFD maintainer (Lee) so yeah dropping that for >> now and doing the SCU move next cycle is probably the best. >> >> Dropping the IPS move for now is fine with me too. >> >> Can you send a v5 with those 2 patches dropped ?> > Yes. Great, thank you. Regards, Hans
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-20 10:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-19 16:37 Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] platform/x86: intel_bxtwc_tmu: Move to intel sub-directory Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] platform/x86: intel_chtdc_ti_pwrbtn: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] platform/x86: intel_mrfld_pwrbtn: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] platform/x86: intel_punit_ipc: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] platform/x86: intel_scu: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] platform/x86: intel_telemetry: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] platform/x86: intel_ips: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] platform/x86: intel-rst: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] platform/x86: intel-smartconnect: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] platform/x86: intel_turbo_max_3: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] platform/x86: intel-uncore-frequency: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] platform/x86: intel_speed_select_if: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] platform/x86: intel_atomisp2: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] platform/x86: intel-hid: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] platform/x86: intel_int0002_vgpio: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] platform/x86: intel_oaktrail: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] platform/x86: intel-wmi-sbl-fw-update: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] platform/x86: intel-wmi-thunderbolt: " Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 16:37 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] platform/x86/intel: scu: Fix doc of intel_scu_ipc_dev_command_with_size() Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 17:46 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] platform/x86: Intel platform driver code movement Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-19 18:46 ` Hans de Goede 2021-08-20 10:12 ` Andy Shevchenko 2021-08-20 10:22 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=35fcce39-dc82-a656-a3f5-0a39dee39cff@redhat.com \ --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \ --cc=Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com \ --cc=acelan.kao@canonical.com \ --cc=alex.hung@canonical.com \ --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \ --cc=david.e.box@intel.com \ --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \ --cc=hpa@redhat.com \ --cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \ --cc=jithu.joseph@intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=maurice.ma@intel.com \ --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \ --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \ --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=qipeng.zha@intel.com \ --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] platform/x86: Intel platform driver code movement' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).