platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] regulator: core: Add regulator_lookup_list
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 22:25:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5421695-803a-52fd-ea2e-edd9ef548892@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YSZk5tyAxZoosXS3@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>

Hi,

On 8/25/21 5:42 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 04:27:35PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 04:48:15PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel, I believe that what Mark wants here is something similar to what
>>> we already do for the 5v boost converter regulator in the TI bq24190 charger
>>> chip used on some Cherry Trail devices.
>>
>> Yeah, that or something like a generalized version of it which lets a
>> separate quirk file like they seem to have register the data to insert -
>> I'd be happy enough with the simple thing too given that it's not
>> visible to anything, or with DMI quirks in the regulator driver too for
>> that matter if it's just one or two platforms but there do seem to be
>> rather a lot of these platforms which need quirks.
> 
> Let's also remember that we have to handle not just regulators, but also
> GPIOs and clocks. And I'm pretty sure there will be more. We could have
> a mechanism specific to the tps68470 driver to pass platform data from
> the board file to the driver, and replicate that mechanism in different
> drivers (for other regulators, clocks and GPIOs), but I really would
> like to avoid splitting the DMI-conditioned platform data in those
> drivers directly. I'd like to store all the init data for a given
> platform in a single "board" file.

I agree, but so far all the handling for clks/gpios for IPU3 (+ IPU4 (*))
laptops is done in the drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472 code and the
passing of platform_data with regulator init-data would also happen in
the mfd-cell instantiation code living there. IOW if we just go with
that then we will already have everything in one place. At least
for the IPU3 case.

Regards,

Hans



*) IPU4 also used the INT3472 ACPI devices and what we have for discrete
IO devices seems to match.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-24 23:06 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Add regulator_lookup_list and API Daniel Scally
2021-08-24 23:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] regulator: core: Add regulator_lookup_list Daniel Scally
2021-08-25 10:33   ` Mark Brown
2021-08-25 11:10     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-25 11:30       ` Mark Brown
2021-08-25 12:26         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-25 13:11           ` Mark Brown
2021-08-25 13:59             ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-25 14:03               ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-25 14:33                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-25 14:12               ` Daniel Scally
2021-08-25 14:22                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-25 14:52                   ` Mark Brown
2021-08-25 22:09                     ` Daniel Scally
2021-08-26 12:40                       ` Mark Brown
2021-08-25 14:41               ` Mark Brown
2021-08-25 14:48     ` Hans de Goede
2021-08-25 15:27       ` Mark Brown
2021-08-25 15:42         ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-25 16:13           ` Mark Brown
2021-08-25 20:25           ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2021-08-25 20:40             ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-08-25 21:24               ` Daniel Scally
2021-08-25 21:17       ` Daniel Scally
2021-08-24 23:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] Documentation: power: Document regulator_lookup_list Daniel Scally
2021-08-24 23:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] platform/surface: Add Surface Go 2 board file Daniel Scally

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a5421695-803a-52fd-ea2e-edd9ef548892@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
    --cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).