* Re: [poky] [PATCH] gcc sanitizers also build statically for dunfell
[not found] <DB4PR10MB626484D5E6016A888599727AA57F9@DB4PR10MB6264.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
@ 2022-09-05 9:50 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2022-09-05 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: a.thoma, poky
On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 09:21 +0000, Thoma, Alexander via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> From ba6cdecb93c09e1f218542a3cfbeb63d9141e069 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexander Thoma a.thoma@rational-online.com
> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 08:41:09 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gcc-sanitizers: modify to also build static libs
>
> gcc-sanitizers static-dev can be build for static and dynamic linking. Before static-dev package was always empty since static build was not enabled.
> Package-dependencies needs to be rearranged since both dev and static-dev need the obj-files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Thoma a.thoma@rational-online.com
> Signed-off-by: Florian Wuehr f.wuehr@rational-online.com
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-sanitizers.inc | 43 +++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
This needs to go to the OE-Core list. Also, which release is this
against? It looks like it is against something older like dunfell and
wouldn't work with master.
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-09-05 9:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <DB4PR10MB626484D5E6016A888599727AA57F9@DB4PR10MB6264.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2022-09-05 9:50 ` [poky] [PATCH] gcc sanitizers also build statically for dunfell Richard Purdie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).