qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wasim, Bilal" <Bilal_Wasim@mentor.com>
To: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
Cc: "peter.maydell@linaro.org" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"alistair@alistair23.me" <alistair@alistair23.me>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"qemu-arm@nongnu.org" <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Updating the GEM MAC IP to properly filter out the multicast addresses
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 08:54:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <103588e5aa0c43858123d77131ff136f@SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef4adfa40b5543fba4b8e673e36cbd9e@SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com>

git "send-email" doesn't really work well with my work account because the server considers it "less secure" and does NOT provide a way around it.. I've had to re-submit the patch from my secondary email... 

-----Original Message-----
From: Qemu-arm [mailto:qemu-arm-bounces+bilal_wasim=mentor.com@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Wasim, Bilal
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 10:35 PM
To: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org; alistair@alistair23.me; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Updating the GEM MAC IP to properly filter out the multicast addresses

Thanks for the pointers.. I will incorporate all these changes and post an updated thread asap.. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Edgar E. Iglesias [mailto:edgar.iglesias@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 10:32 PM
To: Wasim, Bilal <Bilal_Wasim@mentor.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; alistair@alistair23.me; peter.maydell@linaro.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updating the GEM MAC IP to properly filter out the multicast addresses

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 05:02:00PM +0000, Wasim, Bilal wrote:
> This was one of my first attempts, and so I was sure to miss something.. I've incorporated all the updates in this patch.. Let me know what you think about this.. 
> 
> net/cadence_gem: Updating the GEM MAC IP to properly filter out the multicast addresses.
> 
> The current code makes a bad assumption that the most-significant byte 
> of the MAC address is used to determine if the address is multicast or 
> unicast, but in reality only a single bit is used to determine this.
> This caused IPv6 to not work.. Fix is now in place and has been tested 
> with ZCU102-A53 / IPv6 on a TAP interface. Works well..

Thanks Bilal,

This looks better but not quite there yet.

* You don't seem to be using git-send-email to post patches, try it, it will make life easier wrt to formatting. The patch should be in a separate email. The subject line should be the subject of the email.
git-format-patch and git-send-email will take care of that for you.

* You don't need to define IS_MULTICAST, you can directly use is_multicast_ether_addr() and friends.

* The patch still has long lines (longer than 80 chars) You can run scripts/checkpatch.pl on your commit before posting the patch.

Cheers,
Edgar



> 
> Signed-off-by: Bilal Wasim <bilal_wasim@mentor.com>
> ---
>  hw/net/cadence_gem.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/net/cadence_gem.c b/hw/net/cadence_gem.c index 
> b8be73dc55..98efb93f8a 100644
> --- a/hw/net/cadence_gem.c
> +++ b/hw/net/cadence_gem.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include "qemu/module.h"
>  #include "sysemu/dma.h"
>  #include "net/checksum.h"
> +#include "net/eth.h"
>  
>  #ifdef CADENCE_GEM_ERR_DEBUG
>  #define DB_PRINT(...) do { \
> @@ -315,6 +316,12 @@
>  
>  #define GEM_MODID_VALUE 0x00020118
>  
> +/* IEEE has specified that the most significant bit of the most 
> +significant byte be used for
> + * distinguishing between Unicast and Multicast addresses.
> + * If its a 1, that means multicast, 0 means unicast.   */
> +#define IS_MULTICAST(address)           is_multicast_ether_addr(address)
> +#define IS_UNICAST(address)             is_unicast_ether_addr(address)
> +
>  static inline uint64_t tx_desc_get_buffer(CadenceGEMState *s, 
> uint32_t *desc)  {
>      uint64_t ret = desc[0];
> @@ -601,7 +608,7 @@ static void gem_receive_updatestats(CadenceGEMState *s, const uint8_t *packet,
>      }
>  
>      /* Error-free Multicast Frames counter */
> -    if (packet[0] == 0x01) {
> +    if (IS_MULTICAST(packet)) {
>          s->regs[GEM_RXMULTICNT]++;
>      }
>  
> @@ -690,21 +697,21 @@ static int gem_mac_address_filter(CadenceGEMState *s, const uint8_t *packet)
>      }
>  
>      /* Accept packets -w- hash match? */
> -    if ((packet[0] == 0x01 && (s->regs[GEM_NWCFG] & GEM_NWCFG_MCAST_HASH)) ||
> -        (packet[0] != 0x01 && (s->regs[GEM_NWCFG] & GEM_NWCFG_UCAST_HASH))) {
> +    if ((IS_MULTICAST(packet) && (s->regs[GEM_NWCFG] & GEM_NWCFG_MCAST_HASH)) ||
> +        (IS_UNICAST(packet)   && (s->regs[GEM_NWCFG] & GEM_NWCFG_UCAST_HASH))) {
>          unsigned hash_index;
>  
>          hash_index = calc_mac_hash(packet);
>          if (hash_index < 32) {
>              if (s->regs[GEM_HASHLO] & (1<<hash_index)) {
> -                return packet[0] == 0x01 ? GEM_RX_MULTICAST_HASH_ACCEPT :
> -                                           GEM_RX_UNICAST_HASH_ACCEPT;
> +                return IS_MULTICAST(packet) ? GEM_RX_MULTICAST_HASH_ACCEPT :
> +                                              
> + GEM_RX_UNICAST_HASH_ACCEPT;
>              }
>          } else {
>              hash_index -= 32;
>              if (s->regs[GEM_HASHHI] & (1<<hash_index)) {
> -                return packet[0] == 0x01 ? GEM_RX_MULTICAST_HASH_ACCEPT :
> -                                           GEM_RX_UNICAST_HASH_ACCEPT;
> +                return IS_MULTICAST(packet) ? GEM_RX_MULTICAST_HASH_ACCEPT :
> +                                              
> + GEM_RX_UNICAST_HASH_ACCEPT;
>              }
>          }
>      }
> --
> 2.19.1.windows.1
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edgar E. Iglesias [mailto:edgar.iglesias@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 9:00 PM
> To: Wasim, Bilal <Bilal_Wasim@mentor.com>
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; alistair@alistair23.me; 
> peter.maydell@linaro.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updating the GEM MAC IP to properly filter out 
> the multicast addresses
> 
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 03:10:16PM +0000, Wasim, Bilal wrote:
> > [PATCH] Updating the GEM MAC IP to properly filter out the multicast 
> > addresses. The current code makes a bad assumption that the 
> > most-significant byte of the MAC address is used to determine if the 
> > address is multicast or unicast, but in reality only a single bit is 
> > used to determine this. This caused IPv6 to not work.. Fix is now in 
> > place and has been tested with
> > ZCU102-A53 / IPv6 on a TAP interface. Works well..
> 
> Hi Bilal,
> 
> The fix looks right to me but I have a few comments.
> 
> * Your patch seems a little wrongly formated.
> [PATCH] goes into the Subject line for example and you're missing path prefixes.
> 
> Do a git log -- hw/net/cadence_gem.c to see examples on how it should look.
> 
> * The patch will probably not pass checkpatch since you seem to have long lines.
> 
> * We also need to update gem_receive_updatestats() to use the corrected macros.
> 
> More inline:
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bilal Wasim <bilal_wasim@mentor.com>
> > ---
> > hw/net/cadence_gem.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/net/cadence_gem.c b/hw/net/cadence_gem.c index
> > b8be73d..f8bcbb3 100644
> > --- a/hw/net/cadence_gem.c
> > +++ b/hw/net/cadence_gem.c
> > @@ -315,6 +315,12 @@
> >  #define GEM_MODID_VALUE 0x00020118
> > +/* IEEE has specified that the most significant bit of the most 
> > +significant byte be used for
> > + * distinguishing between Unicast and Multicast addresses.
> > + * If its a 1, that means multicast, 0 means unicast.   */
> > +#define IS_MULTICAST(address)           (((address[0] & 0x01) == 0x01) ? 1 : 0)
> 
> 
> 
> This can be simplified:
> #define IS_MULTICAST(address) (address[0] & 1)
> 
> Actually, looking closer, we already have functions to do these checks in:
> include/net/eth.h
> 
> static inline int is_multicast_ether_addr(const uint8_t *addr) static 
> inline int is_broadcast_ether_addr(const uint8_t *addr) static inline 
> int is_unicast_ether_addr(const uint8_t *addr)
> 
> 
> 
> > +#define IS_UNICAST(address)             (!IS_MULTICAST(address))
> > +
> > static inline uint64_t tx_desc_get_buffer(CadenceGEMState *s, 
> > uint32_t
> > *desc) {
> >      uint64_t ret = desc[0];
> > @@ -690,21 +696,21 @@ static int gem_mac_address_filter(CadenceGEMState *s, const uint8_t *packet)
> >      }
> >      /* Accept packets -w- hash match? */
> > -    if ((packet[0] == 0x01 && (s->regs[GEM_NWCFG] & GEM_NWCFG_MCAST_HASH)) ||
> > -        (packet[0] != 0x01 && (s->regs[GEM_NWCFG] & GEM_NWCFG_UCAST_HASH))) {
> > +    if ((IS_MULTICAST(packet) && (s->regs[GEM_NWCFG] & GEM_NWCFG_MCAST_HASH)) ||
> > +        (IS_UNICAST(packet)   && (s->regs[GEM_NWCFG] & GEM_NWCFG_UCAST_HASH))) {
> >          unsigned hash_index;
> >          hash_index = calc_mac_hash(packet);
> >          if (hash_index < 32) {
> >              if (s->regs[GEM_HASHLO] & (1<<hash_index)) {
> > -                return packet[0] == 0x01 ? GEM_RX_MULTICAST_HASH_ACCEPT :
> > -                                           GEM_RX_UNICAST_HASH_ACCEPT;
> > +                return IS_MULTICAST(packet) ? GEM_RX_MULTICAST_HASH_ACCEPT :
> > +                                              
> > + GEM_RX_UNICAST_HASH_ACCEPT;
> >              }
> >          } else {
> >              hash_index -= 32;
> >              if (s->regs[GEM_HASHHI] & (1<<hash_index)) {
> > -                return packet[0] == 0x01 ? GEM_RX_MULTICAST_HASH_ACCEPT :
> > -                                           GEM_RX_UNICAST_HASH_ACCEPT;
> > +                return IS_MULTICAST(packet) ? GEM_RX_MULTICAST_HASH_ACCEPT :
> > +                                              
> > + GEM_RX_UNICAST_HASH_ACCEPT;
> >              }
> >          }
> >      }
> > --
> > 2.9.3
> > 



  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-29  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-28 15:10 [PATCH] Updating the GEM MAC IP to properly filter out the multicast addresses Wasim, Bilal
2019-11-28 15:59 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2019-11-28 17:02   ` Wasim, Bilal
2019-11-28 17:31     ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2019-11-28 17:34       ` Wasim, Bilal
2019-11-29  8:54         ` Wasim, Bilal [this message]
2019-11-29 10:00     ` no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=103588e5aa0c43858123d77131ff136f@SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com \
    --to=bilal_wasim@mentor.com \
    --cc=alistair@alistair23.me \
    --cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).