qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] memory: remove incorrect RCU comment for address_space_read()
@ 2021-09-09 14:10 Stefan Hajnoczi
  2021-09-09 16:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2021-09-09 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Stefan Hajnoczi, Peter Xu, David Hildenbrand

Although the doc comment says "Called within RCU critical section" the
address_space_read() function takes the RCU read lock itself. There is
no need for the caller to hold an RCU read lock.

Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Fixes: b2a44fcad74f1cc7a6786d38eba7db12ab2352ba ("address_space_read: address_space_to_flatview needs RCU lock")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 include/exec/memory.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h
index c3d417d317..60508a1e19 100644
--- a/include/exec/memory.h
+++ b/include/exec/memory.h
@@ -2768,7 +2768,7 @@ static inline bool memory_access_is_direct(MemoryRegion *mr, bool is_write)
  *
  * Return a MemTxResult indicating whether the operation succeeded
  * or failed (eg unassigned memory, device rejected the transaction,
- * IOMMU fault).  Called within RCU critical section.
+ * IOMMU fault).
  *
  * @as: #AddressSpace to be accessed
  * @addr: address within that address space
-- 
2.31.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] memory: remove incorrect RCU comment for address_space_read()
  2021-09-09 14:10 [PATCH] memory: remove incorrect RCU comment for address_space_read() Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2021-09-09 16:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2021-09-09 16:43 ` David Hildenbrand
  2021-09-12  6:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2021-09-09 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Peter Xu, David Hildenbrand

On 9/9/21 4:10 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Although the doc comment says "Called within RCU critical section" the
> address_space_read() function takes the RCU read lock itself. There is
> no need for the caller to hold an RCU read lock.
> 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Fixes: b2a44fcad74f1cc7a6786d38eba7db12ab2352ba ("address_space_read: address_space_to_flatview needs RCU lock")
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/exec/memory.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] memory: remove incorrect RCU comment for address_space_read()
  2021-09-09 14:10 [PATCH] memory: remove incorrect RCU comment for address_space_read() Stefan Hajnoczi
  2021-09-09 16:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2021-09-09 16:43 ` David Hildenbrand
  2021-09-12  6:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2021-09-09 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Peter Xu

On 09.09.21 16:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Although the doc comment says "Called within RCU critical section" the
> address_space_read() function takes the RCU read lock itself. There is
> no need for the caller to hold an RCU read lock.
> 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Fixes: b2a44fcad74f1cc7a6786d38eba7db12ab2352ba ("address_space_read: address_space_to_flatview needs RCU lock")
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>   include/exec/memory.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h
> index c3d417d317..60508a1e19 100644
> --- a/include/exec/memory.h
> +++ b/include/exec/memory.h
> @@ -2768,7 +2768,7 @@ static inline bool memory_access_is_direct(MemoryRegion *mr, bool is_write)
>    *
>    * Return a MemTxResult indicating whether the operation succeeded
>    * or failed (eg unassigned memory, device rejected the transaction,
> - * IOMMU fault).  Called within RCU critical section.
> + * IOMMU fault).
>    *
>    * @as: #AddressSpace to be accessed
>    * @addr: address within that address space
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] memory: remove incorrect RCU comment for address_space_read()
  2021-09-09 14:10 [PATCH] memory: remove incorrect RCU comment for address_space_read() Stefan Hajnoczi
  2021-09-09 16:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  2021-09-09 16:43 ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2021-09-12  6:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2021-09-12  6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel; +Cc: Peter Xu, David Hildenbrand

On 09/09/21 16:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Although the doc comment says "Called within RCU critical section" the
> address_space_read() function takes the RCU read lock itself. There is
> no need for the caller to hold an RCU read lock.
> 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Fixes: b2a44fcad74f1cc7a6786d38eba7db12ab2352ba ("address_space_read: address_space_to_flatview needs RCU lock")
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>   include/exec/memory.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h
> index c3d417d317..60508a1e19 100644
> --- a/include/exec/memory.h
> +++ b/include/exec/memory.h
> @@ -2768,7 +2768,7 @@ static inline bool memory_access_is_direct(MemoryRegion *mr, bool is_write)
>    *
>    * Return a MemTxResult indicating whether the operation succeeded
>    * or failed (eg unassigned memory, device rejected the transaction,
> - * IOMMU fault).  Called within RCU critical section.
> + * IOMMU fault).
>    *
>    * @as: #AddressSpace to be accessed
>    * @addr: address within that address space
> 

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-12  6:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-09 14:10 [PATCH] memory: remove incorrect RCU comment for address_space_read() Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-09-09 16:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-09 16:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-12  6:54 ` Paolo Bonzini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).